由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
CS版 - 大家说说你们都是怎么读paper的吧.
相关主题
Research Topic被老板拒了,因为和前一个topic太相似怎么写paper
paper悲剧了,郁闷,求安慰今天看了一个会议相关领域的所有paper的review
Research paper vs. Industrial paper怎样distribute "call for papers"
请教:到底会议的文章能不能再发journal?[转载] 问个review paper的问题
[转载] Re: 哪个PAPER水平高,一流会议WORKSHOP还是普通CONFERENCE关于CS的conference paper和journal paper
Re: [转载] 有关做研究Semantic Web方面的paper哪些会议比较好?
PressureRe: How about IPDPS
[转载] SCI paper search这种情况不至于算抄袭吧?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: paper话题: papers话题: focus话题: reading话题: topic
进入CS版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
w********a
发帖数: 114
1
我在读paper的时候总是觉得读的太慢了,你们如果打算真正读懂一篇paper一
般花费多少时间?我平均要花费1天半,而且读过了感觉很容易忘记读过的内容.
j****y
发帖数: 123
2
make some notes

【在 w********a 的大作中提到】
: 我在读paper的时候总是觉得读的太慢了,你们如果打算真正读懂一篇paper一
: 般花费多少时间?我平均要花费1天半,而且读过了感觉很容易忘记读过的内容.

f*****r
发帖数: 229
3
Reading reader is not a linear procedure.
First, find your interested topic, and collect lots of papers about that
topic. Then, reading only first 2-3 sections (intro, related work, main
scheme) of some new papers, and get the feeling about 1) what are foundamental
background or basic concepts for this topic? 2) What techniques are typically
used in these papers? 3) Figure out which papers are classical,
foundamental,or seminal works in this area? 4) Most importantly, figure out
what are possib

【在 w********a 的大作中提到】
: 我在读paper的时候总是觉得读的太慢了,你们如果打算真正读懂一篇paper一
: 般花费多少时间?我平均要花费1天半,而且读过了感觉很容易忘记读过的内容.

r********n
发帖数: 75
4
好paper读一天半不多啊.

【在 w********a 的大作中提到】
: 我在读paper的时候总是觉得读的太慢了,你们如果打算真正读懂一篇paper一
: 般花费多少时间?我平均要花费1天半,而且读过了感觉很容易忘记读过的内容.

i******y
发帖数: 70
5
Depending on what kind of paper you are reading:
1. If you just start research, focus on the classical papers and read them
carefully from the beginning to the end. It can take 5 hours.
2. If you already have some background in the field and you are reading some
papers related to your topic, focus on abstract, introduction. No need to read
related work and experiments. Half an hour is enough. If you feel it's good,
go ahead to read the first 1-2 technical sections or even more. By the way,
focus

【在 w********a 的大作中提到】
: 我在读paper的时候总是觉得读的太慢了,你们如果打算真正读懂一篇paper一
: 般花费多少时间?我平均要花费1天半,而且读过了感觉很容易忘记读过的内容.

r********n
发帖数: 75
6

come on. 向我这种常写bad papers的人还等着reviewers的意见来改paper呢.
我怎么觉得要reject的paper更应该多写点呢. 否则人家死了都不知道怎么死的.

【在 i******y 的大作中提到】
: Depending on what kind of paper you are reading:
: 1. If you just start research, focus on the classical papers and read them
: carefully from the beginning to the end. It can take 5 hours.
: 2. If you already have some background in the field and you are reading some
: papers related to your topic, focus on abstract, introduction. No need to read
: related work and experiments. Half an hour is enough. If you feel it's good,
: go ahead to read the first 1-2 technical sections or even more. By the way,
: focus

R****r
发帖数: 227
7
depends on which area...

【在 w********a 的大作中提到】
: 我在读paper的时候总是觉得读的太慢了,你们如果打算真正读懂一篇paper一
: 般花费多少时间?我平均要花费1天半,而且读过了感觉很容易忘记读过的内容.

i******y
发帖数: 70
8

some
read
good,
way,
bad,
sections.
I am sorry. I didn't make it clear. I mean if you decide to reject a paper,
you should focus on the big things (such as motivation, contribution, overall
technical approach). When the authors revise the paper, they should also focus
on that. There is no point to revise other stuffs if these fundamental things
are not strong.

【在 r********n 的大作中提到】
:
: come on. 向我这种常写bad papers的人还等着reviewers的意见来改paper呢.
: 我怎么觉得要reject的paper更应该多写点呢. 否则人家死了都不知道怎么死的.

w********a
发帖数: 114
9
大牛啊!!
多谢,看来我要好好调整自己的方法了,感觉一篇文章读下来我被作者牵着走,
他说好我就觉得他的方法好,以后别的作者指出他的不足,我才发现这些不足.
看来还是自己修养不够啊!

【在 f*****r 的大作中提到】
: Reading reader is not a linear procedure.
: First, find your interested topic, and collect lots of papers about that
: topic. Then, reading only first 2-3 sections (intro, related work, main
: scheme) of some new papers, and get the feeling about 1) what are foundamental
: background or basic concepts for this topic? 2) What techniques are typically
: used in these papers? 3) Figure out which papers are classical,
: foundamental,or seminal works in this area? 4) Most importantly, figure out
: what are possib

w********a
发帖数: 114
10


【在 i******y 的大作中提到】
: Depending on what kind of paper you are reading:
: 1. If you just start research, focus on the classical papers and read them
: carefully from the beginning to the end. It can take 5 hours.
: 2. If you already have some background in the field and you are reading some
: papers related to your topic, focus on abstract, introduction. No need to read
: related work and experiments. Half an hour is enough. If you feel it's good,
: go ahead to read the first 1-2 technical sections or even more. By the way,
: focus

R****r
发帖数: 227
11
你是读哪个方向的

【在 w********a 的大作中提到】

1 (共1页)
进入CS版参与讨论
相关主题
这种情况不至于算抄袭吧?[转载] Re: 哪个PAPER水平高,一流会议WORKSHOP还是普通CONFERENCE
[转载] A dilemma, please advise!Re: [转载] 有关做研究
[转载] Re: 探讨一下对一类papers的看法Pressure
A strong guy[转载] SCI paper search
Research Topic被老板拒了,因为和前一个topic太相似怎么写paper
paper悲剧了,郁闷,求安慰今天看了一个会议相关领域的所有paper的review
Research paper vs. Industrial paper怎样distribute "call for papers"
请教:到底会议的文章能不能再发journal?[转载] 问个review paper的问题
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: paper话题: papers话题: focus话题: reading话题: topic