由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
CanadaNews版 - 施一公是真正的中华之魂
相关主题
看到如此意淫,你笑了吗? (转载)这个大法官要被打成racist了
施一公是真正的中华之魂埃及伊斯兰主义总统给美国上课的季节到了
假如施一公是真的理想主义者Trump的支持者打出标语
学生给的evaluation出来了这个是比较全面总结昨天辩论班主任的表现的
Mental healthTrump, if elected, will put Hillary in Jail
美国现在很恶心了trump戴了小型耳机,NYT记者又报fake news了
这次活动要讲策略-请批评!加州的这个战斗机,又在听证会上胡闹了
Dalai Lama的全部准确行程如下jeb和biden在一起
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: american话题: chinese话题: rules话题: engagement
进入CanadaNews版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
U*E
发帖数: 3620
1
Writing about China
Similar to the vast majority of China-related articles in the mainstream
media, the article “Rules of engagement” (feature, Jan. 24) is written to
the taste of American readership and appears to be a balanced report of
representative opinions.
I worry about the impact of the article, however. While the content is
truthful in isolation, the article may have reinforced the misunderstanding
and unrealistic expectations of China by the American public.
I actively participated in the pro-democracy demonstration in Tiananmen
Square in Beijing in 1989. I came to the United States in 1990. During the
following years, I was shocked to witness the extremely negative portrayal
and demonization of China by American media. Don’t get me wrong — I agree
that what was reported has been mostly truthful in isolation. However, by
relentlessly focusing on a tiny spot of a vast country of extreme diversity,
the American media give American people an extremely biased view of China.
This problem is not remedied in “Rules of engagement,” which failed to
give adequate coverage from the Chinese side. If we do not understand how
China thinks of our view on engagement, how can we define rules of
engagement? Aren’t we simply lecturing the Chinese on how to engage and how
to follow our rules? Aren’t we imposing our values and ideas on the
Chinese without understanding them first?
The fundamental issue, both here and on issues related to China, is not
freedom of speech, but mutual understanding. To me, Americans simply do not
have a basic understanding of China or the Chinese, and American media have
yet to make a serious endeavor to cover China in a fair and balanced manner.
Much too often, when an effort is made, interjecting biased comment
immediately defeats the purpose. China is changing fast in all aspects of
life, but our views on China have been stagnant.
I spent the first 23 years of my life in China, having lived in a village of
extreme poverty, a small town of frugality and ethnic division, a
provincial capital with a booming economy and social changes, and the
capital city of China. There is no doubt in my mind that democracy in the U.
S. style simply does not work in China. Singing high praises of freedom of
speech and democracy is one matter; advancing a vast country of extreme
diversity is another.
Shouldn’t Iraq be a lesson for us all? Keep in mind: The complexity in Iraq
is not in the same order of magnitude as that in China.
YIGONG SHI
Professor, Department of Molecular Biology
1 (共1页)
进入CanadaNews版参与讨论
相关主题
jeb和biden在一起Mental health
请问job talk是否还需要自我介绍?美国现在很恶心了
C# $$$$这次活动要讲策略-请批评!
breaking news, Candy Crowley 道歉了,o8的Rose Garde演讲根本 (转载)Dalai Lama的全部准确行程如下
看到如此意淫,你笑了吗? (转载)这个大法官要被打成racist了
施一公是真正的中华之魂埃及伊斯兰主义总统给美国上课的季节到了
假如施一公是真的理想主义者Trump的支持者打出标语
学生给的evaluation出来了这个是比较全面总结昨天辩论班主任的表现的
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: china话题: american话题: chinese话题: rules话题: engagement