m***j
发帖数: 1215 | 1 遇到这样的审稿意见，简直无语。编辑直接给据了。哎，感觉rebutal的机会很渺茫阿
。求建议！怎么和编辑argue。
Reviewer: 1
Recommendation: Publish in a different journal.
Comments:
This manuscript by Cheng et al describes the nonequlibrium molecular
dynamics for thermal conductivity XXX. The work is carried out carefully and
includes an interesting result related with a thermal conductivity of two
nanomaterials. Although the authors explained the size dependence of
conductivity using non-equilibrium MD, theoretical and experimental studies
about size dependent thermal conductivity of XX have already been described
in literature by many researchers ( J. Hone et al and L. Lindsay et al etc..
). Therefore, the content in this work is lack of novelty in some extent and
not suitable for publication in ACS Nano. I recommend the publication in
more specific journal.
Additional Questions:
Is this paper in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field?: No
If this paper is not in the top 15% of manuscripts in the field: It could be
improved to be in the top 15% with further work.
Is it appealing to a broad audience?: No
Does the manuscript give a complete description of the procedures that could
be reproduced by others in the field?: Yes
Are the conclusions adequately supported by the data?: Yes
Are the literature references appropriate and correct?: Yes
Is the manuscript a comprehensive article/review?: Yes
Significance: Moderate
Novelty: Moderate
Broad interest: Moderate
Scholarly presentation: High |
c*********k
发帖数: 20696 | 2 缺乏新意，这个没法argue吧
and
studies
【在 m***j 的大作中提到】
: 遇到这样的审稿意见，简直无语。编辑直接给据了。哎，感觉rebutal的机会很渺茫阿
: 。求建议！怎么和编辑argue。
: Reviewer: 1
: Recommendation: Publish in a different journal.
: Comments:
: This manuscript by Cheng et al describes the nonequlibrium molecular
: dynamics for thermal conductivity XXX. The work is carried out carefully and
: includes an interesting result related with a thermal conductivity of two
: nanomaterials. Although the authors explained the size dependence of
: conductivity using non-equilibrium MD, theoretical and experimental studies
|
m***j
发帖数: 1215 | 3 结果新算不算有新意呢？ 反正挑不出来毛病就来一个没新意给你毙了。 不知道这些人
有没有想过我花了多少心血做出来的。 哎
【在 c*********k 的大作中提到】
: 缺乏新意，这个没法argue吧
:
: and
: studies
|
s*******h
发帖数: 3731 | 4 BSO自己是老板。。。
【在 m***j 的大作中提到】
: 结果新算不算有新意呢？ 反正挑不出来毛病就来一个没新意给你毙了。 不知道这些人
: 有没有想过我花了多少心血做出来的。 哎
|
c*********k
发帖数: 20696 | 5 那也没办法
【在 m***j 的大作中提到】
: 结果新算不算有新意呢？ 反正挑不出来毛病就来一个没新意给你毙了。 不知道这些人
: 有没有想过我花了多少心血做出来的。 哎
|
x*******2
发帖数: 5333 | 6 推荐你发不通的JOURNAL已经很NICE了，我要是觉得对方的东西不好一般都直接说低于
50%哈哈哈 |
w****t
发帖数: 1849 | 7 没有novelty是惯用的手段，让你无法argue。 |
y***e
发帖数: 6082 | 8 审稿意见就是狗屁，编辑说你行就行，三个审稿都说小修改的可以被编辑直接拒，三个
审稿里面两个说一钱不值的照样小修改后接受，有空rebutal还不如拿着那点时间改格
式，自我感觉好的话还不如投个差不多级别的杂志
and
studies
【在 m***j 的大作中提到】
: 遇到这样的审稿意见，简直无语。编辑直接给据了。哎，感觉rebutal的机会很渺茫阿
: 。求建议！怎么和编辑argue。
: Reviewer: 1
: Recommendation: Publish in a different journal.
: Comments:
: This manuscript by Cheng et al describes the nonequlibrium molecular
: dynamics for thermal conductivity XXX. The work is carried out carefully and
: includes an interesting result related with a thermal conductivity of two
: nanomaterials. Although the authors explained the size dependence of
: conductivity using non-equilibrium MD, theoretical and experimental studies
|
e****d
发帖数: 110 | 9 agree！
理会审稿意见不如干点别的。
【在 y***e 的大作中提到】
: 审稿意见就是狗屁，编辑说你行就行，三个审稿都说小修改的可以被编辑直接拒，三个
: 审稿里面两个说一钱不值的照样小修改后接受，有空rebutal还不如拿着那点时间改格
: 式，自我感觉好的话还不如投个差不多级别的杂志
:
: and
: studies
|
