|
|
相关主题 |
---|
● 经典对局-Anderssen,A - Kieseritsky | ● ye jiangchuan | ● 93rd ch-GBR Davies,Ni--Haslinger,S | ● 7th ch-Euro Pashikian,A--Galego,L | ● 国象灌水(8) | ● 7th ch-Euro Steingrimsson,H--Aleskerov,F | ● 心仪的布局 | ● 7th ch-Euro Andersson,U--Simeonidis,I | ● 心仪的布局 | ● 名局鉴赏--Scandinavian开局 | ● 轻子魔法 | ● 7th ch-Euro Kurmann,O--Bogner,S | ● 7th ch-Euro Romanov,E--Galego,L | ● 国象灌水(12) | ● 7th ch-Euro Soltanici,R--Hulak,K | ● zhao xue's game |
|
|
|
|
a*****y 发帖数: 361 | 1 接下来的日子比较混乱。欧洲各个国家都有一个拔尖
的棋手,互有胜负。一时群龙无首。比如英国的staunton和
德国的adolf andersson. 这个andersson就是贡献了历史
上最著名的immortal game和evergreen game的。这两局棋
采取了弃车弃后等一系列令人眼花缭乱的手段,最后神奇
地在子力处于绝对劣势的状况下将死对方,看起来真的是
赏心悦目!
immortal game:
1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Qh4+ 4. Kf1 b5 5. Bxb5 Nf6 6. Nf3 Qh6 7. d3 Nh5
8. Nh4 Qg5 9. Nf5 c6 10. g4 Nf6 11. Rg1 cxb5 12. h4 Qg6 13. h5 Qg5 14. Qf3
Ng8 15. Bxf4 Qf6 16. Nc3 Bc5 17. Nd5 Qxb2 18. Bd6 Qxa1+ 19. Ke2 Bxg1 20. e5
Na6 21. Nxg7+ Kd8 22. Qf6+ Nxf6 23. Be7#
1-0
evergreen game:
1. e4 | r*g 发帖数: 3159 | 2 国象怎么都那么短。
而且高低手差别极大。
这样到底比中象简单还是复杂?
【在 a*****y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 接下来的日子比较混乱。欧洲各个国家都有一个拔尖 : 的棋手,互有胜负。一时群龙无首。比如英国的staunton和 : 德国的adolf andersson. 这个andersson就是贡献了历史 : 上最著名的immortal game和evergreen game的。这两局棋 : 采取了弃车弃后等一系列令人眼花缭乱的手段,最后神奇 : 地在子力处于绝对劣势的状况下将死对方,看起来真的是 : 赏心悦目! : immortal game: : 1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Bc4 Qh4+ 4. Kf1 b5 5. Bxb5 Nf6 6. Nf3 Qh6 7. d3 Nh5 : 8. Nh4 Qg5 9. Nf5 c6 10. g4 Nf6 11. Rg1 cxb5 12. h4 Qg6 13. h5 Qg5 14. Qf3
| a*****y 发帖数: 361 | 3 国象因为开局以后象和后立刻可以进行远程攻击,
所以经常可以速杀。比方说,对付一个新手,十步
以内肯定杀掉了。
跟中象比起来,我总觉得高低手差距要小一点。和
高手下起来,国象一般偶都可以支持下去,最后么
残局才抵抗不住。但和中象高手下起来,根本就是
到了中局就狼狈不堪了。
【在 r*g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 国象怎么都那么短。 : 而且高低手差别极大。 : 这样到底比中象简单还是复杂?
| a*****y 发帖数: 361 | | m******t 发帖数: 2416 | 5 it's not as simple as that. Even though a chess board is smaller
than a chinese chess board, this is compensated by the facts that
there are more long range pieces in chess, and that the pawn and the king
has more freedom on a chess board.
Overall, I always think chess and chinese chess has roughly the
same complexity, which is quite obvious by now a lot simpler than Go.
【在 a*****y 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 8x8 vs. 9x10
| a*****y 发帖数: 361 | 6 for level of complexity, they r the same. i agree....
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : it's not as simple as that. Even though a chess board is smaller : than a chinese chess board, this is compensated by the facts that : there are more long range pieces in chess, and that the pawn and the king : has more freedom on a chess board. : Overall, I always think chess and chinese chess has roughly the : same complexity, which is quite obvious by now a lot simpler than Go.
|
|
|
|
相关主题 |
---|
● zhao xue's game | ● 心仪的布局 | ● wang pin | ● 轻子魔法 | ● 国象之经典Carl Hamppe - Philipp Meitner | ● 7th ch-Euro Romanov,E--Galego,L | ● Garry Kasparov VS. Computer 2003(1) | ● 7th ch-Euro Soltanici,R--Hulak,K | ● 经典对局-Anderssen,A - Kieseritsky | ● ye jiangchuan | ● 93rd ch-GBR Davies,Ni--Haslinger,S | ● 7th ch-Euro Pashikian,A--Galego,L | ● 国象灌水(8) | ● 7th ch-Euro Steingrimsson,H--Aleskerov,F | ● 心仪的布局 | ● 7th ch-Euro Andersson,U--Simeonidis,I |
|
|
|