b*x
发帖数: 5456 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 ChicagoChinesePlaydates 俱乐部 】
发信人: bmx (BMX), 信区: ChicagoChinesePlaydates
标 题: 80-20开始支持income-based AA (转载)
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue May 6 22:47:37 2014, 美东)
【 以下文字转载自 USANews 讨论区 】
发信人: aple (凸-_-凸), 信区: USANews
标 题: 80-20开始支持income-based AA
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Tue May 6 17:36:27 2014, 美东)
今天收到80-20的信：
New York Time emailed to asked 80-20 PAC's Advisor, Haibo Huang,
Ph. D in Physics and 80-20's expert on college admissions, this question:
"Is it time to move to income-based affirmative action?"
Haibo sent back a short but powerful reply:
"Yes, it's time to move on to merit-based college admissions with
socioeconomic considerations. Racial preference is divisive and helps
the wrong kids.
According to 2004 data, 86% of African American students in highly
selective colleges are middle or upper class. Race-conscious admissions
tend to enhance such socioeconomic statistics. In Fisher v. University
of Texas at Austin, plaintiffs challenged the use of race in admissions,
arguing that Texas's race-neutral "Top Ten Percent" creates sufficient
racial diversity: 4.5 percent African-American and 16.9 percent Hispanic
in 2004. Yet the university argued that a "race-conscious" plan is still
needed to bring in affluent minorities to create diversity within diversity,
and an incredulous Justice Kennedy retorted "So what you're saying is
that what counts is race above all." By contrast, here in California where
racial consideration in state university admission is banned, California
schools must work harder to achieve diversity and instead focus on
socioeconomic status. It's working; in the 2011-12 academic year,
approximately 40 percent of students on University of California campuses
were Pell Grant recipients for needy families. In addition, ~42% of UC
student admitted 2007-2008 has both parents without a college degree.
The result: More poor black and Latino students are gaining access to
higher education.
Judging people by their skin color is morally repugnant. It is not fair
to pass over better qualified students based on innate characteristics. It
violates the 14th Amendment. It stigmatizes the so-called beneficiaries
in the eyes of others. It fosters victim mindset, removing any incentive
for excellence. It mismatches students and institutions, causing high
failure
and dropout rates among the “beneficiaries.” It papers over deep-rooted
social problems, condemning under-privileged kids to a permanent cycle
of dysfunctional schools.* It compromises academic mission and hurts U.S.
competitiveness in the global economy. The secondary school students
ranked 30th in math and 23rd in Science out of the 65 countries in the
2009 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) survey. The
US Education Secretary Arne Duncan called it "an absolute wake-up call for
America". And we are still short changing ourselves with racial preferences?
True diversity is the diversity of ideas, the celebration of our differences;
it's not clumsy attempts to equalize everything. If the United States is a
melting pot, why is it necessary to identify each ingredient?
I have a dream**. Do you? (*The author thanks Mr. Roger Clegg for his inputs
.)"
Forward this e-newsletter, 558d if you benefitted from reading the above.
80-20 Is Always Battling for YOU & Your Children
Join the fight by donating to SELF. Click on
http://admin.80-20nj.info/cgi/80/e?l=8/au/1/f&w=no
If SELF doesn't raise the money so that SB can recruit, train, and nurture
at least
3 competent political fighters by the end of 2016, 80-20 will likely
disappear
from the battle field.
Will you have the time, political know-how & will to fight for
yourself? May donating to SELF be the most cost-effective way?
Respectfully,
S. B. Woo, a volunteer
President, 80-20 National AsAm Educational Foundation | b*x
发帖数: 5456 | 2 80-20看来还是狗改不了吃屎啊.幸亏俺还在考虑是不是给他们捐钱啊.
前几天出来反对SCA-5, 现在好, 还没骗一个钱呢, 立马改口支持social-economic
biased 的AA了. 这有个什么区别啊.
打个的比方, 现在要打击行贿受贿了, 大家跟着我给我捐钱啊, 结果半道, 领头赚吆喝
的说,
我们现在反对钱贿赂了, 支持性贿赂了. | c********a
发帖数: 767 | 3 我记得80-20一直是support民主党的，所以对于他们的任何action我都只是看看
我不明白为什么华人会去支持名主党，共很党2016年不再选上的话，我认为基本盘就彻
底翻盘了
名主党是彻头彻尾的骗子，今天电台又开始global warming了，我老公查过非常多的文
献资料，气候变化根本不是什么个co2的问题，就是我们即将进入一个冰河期，太阳黑
子和活动开始降温。。。。
现在唯有共和党才能拯救美国，拯救美国founding father想要建立的自由，平等和创
新的美国精神。从本州做起吧，republican的governor 候选
http://brucerauner.com/ | b*x
发帖数: 5456 | 4 80-20的创始人就是woo, DE州著名党棍.以前就一直支持AA, 一直到2009才公开反对AA.
本来以为这次SCA-5他们会有所改变, 结果没两天就忍不住出柜了.. 这帮脑残, 真是*
花痒. 打赏半斤辣椒粉伺候, 这样至少能阉敌几个.
【在 c********a 的大作中提到】
: 我记得80-20一直是support民主党的，所以对于他们的任何action我都只是看看
: 我不明白为什么华人会去支持名主党，共很党2016年不再选上的话，我认为基本盘就彻
: 底翻盘了
: 名主党是彻头彻尾的骗子，今天电台又开始global warming了，我老公查过非常多的文
: 献资料，气候变化根本不是什么个co2的问题，就是我们即将进入一个冰河期，太阳黑
: 子和活动开始降温。。。。
: 现在唯有共和党才能拯救美国，拯救美国founding father想要建立的自由，平等和创
: 新的美国精神。从本州做起吧，republican的governor 候选
: http://brucerauner.com/
| a***x
发帖数: 26368 | 5 都是猪一样的队友。。。。
【在 c********a 的大作中提到】
: 我记得80-20一直是support民主党的，所以对于他们的任何action我都只是看看
: 我不明白为什么华人会去支持名主党，共很党2016年不再选上的话，我认为基本盘就彻
: 底翻盘了
: 名主党是彻头彻尾的骗子，今天电台又开始global warming了，我老公查过非常多的文
: 献资料，气候变化根本不是什么个co2的问题，就是我们即将进入一个冰河期，太阳黑
: 子和活动开始降温。。。。
: 现在唯有共和党才能拯救美国，拯救美国founding father想要建立的自由，平等和创
: 新的美国精神。从本州做起吧，republican的governor 候选
: http://brucerauner.com/
| T*R
发帖数: 36302 | 6 income based的AA有一定道理的。虽然我反对，但是可以理解。
不可否认，小孩的学习一是和自己的努力／智力有关，但是也和家长的投入有关。家长
的投入包括物质和非物质的。
如果底层人民缺乏上升的渠道，大家都不会有好日子的。
没有办法，这个世界没有绝对的公平。收入based的至少比种族based的强。 | a***x
发帖数: 26368 | 7 大晚上的容易昏头
【在 T*R 的大作中提到】
: income based的AA有一定道理的。虽然我反对，但是可以理解。
: 不可否认，小孩的学习一是和自己的努力／智力有关，但是也和家长的投入有关。家长
: 的投入包括物质和非物质的。
: 如果底层人民缺乏上升的渠道，大家都不会有好日子的。
: 没有办法，这个世界没有绝对的公平。收入based的至少比种族based的强。
| a***x
发帖数: 26368 | 8 不是名猪党，胜似名猪党。
【在 T*R 的大作中提到】
: income based的AA有一定道理的。虽然我反对，但是可以理解。
: 不可否认，小孩的学习一是和自己的努力／智力有关，但是也和家长的投入有关。家长
: 的投入包括物质和非物质的。
: 如果底层人民缺乏上升的渠道，大家都不会有好日子的。
: 没有办法，这个世界没有绝对的公平。收入based的至少比种族based的强。
|
|
