z******i 发帖数: 5114 | 1 EBF的设计里,link beam如果和column连接,节点必须是固接吗?有没有什么文献可以
查阅?
谢谢了 |
t******o 发帖数: 467 | 2 No. Fully restrained Moment connection is NOT desired. Link to column
connection must be capable to sustain some rotation angle. Refer to AISC
Seismic provisions chapter 15.
【在 z******i 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : EBF的设计里,link beam如果和column连接,节点必须是固接吗?有没有什么文献可以 : 查阅? : 谢谢了
|
z******i 发帖数: 5114 | 3 这个我看了,但是有规定在一定的rotation angle的范围内啊,如果做铰接的话,是不
是会达不到这个要求呢?还有commentary里面给了一个图例就是moment conncetion啊
难道做半铰?那节点怎么设计呢?
【在 t******o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : No. Fully restrained Moment connection is NOT desired. Link to column : connection must be capable to sustain some rotation angle. Refer to AISC : Seismic provisions chapter 15.
|
t******o 发帖数: 467 | 4 In real engineering design, under current code, you should avoid to attach
Link to columns. That is advanced topic and a lot of things are still not
clear. If you receive plan check regarding it, it is super hard to pass
building department without testing. This is one of the reasons ASCE7-05
table 12.2-1 only listed EBF with column connection away from links under
Category B (Building Frame Systems).
【在 z******i 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这个我看了,但是有规定在一定的rotation angle的范围内啊,如果做铰接的话,是不 : 是会达不到这个要求呢?还有commentary里面给了一个图例就是moment conncetion啊 : 难道做半铰?那节点怎么设计呢?
|
z******i 发帖数: 5114 | 5 谢谢你了,这个不是我做的,但是各种各样的原因,现在弄成这样,也不知道能不能改
了 |