由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
CivilEngineering版 - Re: 土木工程的前景
相关主题
热烈祝贺土木工程版开版!!!!!大家都来捧场啊!!!!申请土木工程版(CivilEngineering)版副
热烈祝贺土木工程版建版!!!!申请土木工程版(civil engineering)版副
热烈祝贺土木工程版开版!!!!!申请土木工程版(CivilEngineering)版副
今天开版,我来抛砖:土木工程一定要考FE/EIT才能找到工?我来说两句土木工程
祝贺土木工程版建版,捐款$88.88MIT$致庆!在美国当土木工程师的故事-没有美国学历,六年升为VP (ZZ)
欢迎大家来新开的土木工程版,感谢littlestone (转载)本州土木工程研究生毕业起薪
美国的土木工程师团结起来,一起赚大钱吧!中国土木工程专业排名
我也来[合集] Re: [请教] 华中科技大学的土木工程实力如何?
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: financial话题: economy话题: sector话题: 土木工程
进入CivilEngineering版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
G*****9
发帖数: 3225
1
LZ的命运太不济了。
但相信否极泰来,挺过去就是明媚的春天。土木一定会复兴的,一切都会好起来的。
f**c
发帖数: 629
2
赞愿望,不过土木复兴的希望渺茫

【在 G*****9 的大作中提到】
: LZ的命运太不济了。
: 但相信否极泰来,挺过去就是明媚的春天。土木一定会复兴的,一切都会好起来的。

G*****9
发帖数: 3225
3
Other than re-industrialize, there is no hope for non-IT engineering
professions in the States. The so called "service industry" is indeed
supported by the financial sector. As said before, more than 40% of
corporate profit is created on Wall Street.
However, the gain in finance is the loss in the real economy. Without the
need for the real economy, we all underdogs in the society; "Services"
simply suck blood from all of us. The balance between the industrialists and
the bankers lean to the bankers' side since 1970s, when the Bretton Woods
System collapsed and the evil financial derivatives were clothed with "
financial innovation".
With financial sector as the main "economy engine", the few elites get
richer and the rest get poorer. The government does not have enough money to
maintain the infrastructures and there is no strong need for this, since
there are less real economy players as the user of the infrastructures.
What we can hope for is that the country shrink its financial sector such
that more investment goes to other sectors, including the civil engineering.
The words "Globalization" and "Invisible Hands" are simply used to cover the
greedy nature of big corps. They use these as excuses to lower down wages
of engineers and scientists. When mentioning engineering, the management
always thought about lowering down costs.
Considering the high price in "service", there is indeed an urgent demand to
cut down its price. Why doesn't it happen? Because they monopoly the
market. Well, perhaps it is time to union engineers. We are not slaves.
1 (共1页)
进入CivilEngineering版参与讨论
相关主题
[合集] Re: [请教] 华中科技大学的土木工程实力如何?祝贺土木工程版建版,捐款$88.88MIT$致庆!
为自己找工作(土木与环境工程专业)欢迎大家来新开的土木工程版,感谢littlestone (转载)
建筑系和土木工程有啥区别?美国的土木工程师团结起来,一起赚大钱吧!
新人报道+请教关于土木硕士找工作我也来
热烈祝贺土木工程版开版!!!!!大家都来捧场啊!!!!申请土木工程版(CivilEngineering)版副
热烈祝贺土木工程版建版!!!!申请土木工程版(civil engineering)版副
热烈祝贺土木工程版开版!!!!!申请土木工程版(CivilEngineering)版副
今天开版,我来抛砖:土木工程一定要考FE/EIT才能找到工?我来说两句土木工程
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: financial话题: economy话题: sector话题: 土木工程