o**********e 发帖数: 18403 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】
发信人: onetiemyshoe (onetiemyshoe), 信区: SanFrancisco
标 题: 华裔的核心利益不是AA
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Feb 12 13:31:49 2014, 美东)
华裔的核心利益是中美关系。 西方盛行的中国威胁论是日本右翼
精心培植,给美国人洗脑的舆论武器。 代表人为:
JK: "We owe the Chinese a lot of money 1.3 trillion dollars, what should we
do about it?"
Ro Khanna: China's manufacturing is a huge threat. (Actually, Japan and
India are both greater rivals on various front to the US)
We must articulate to counter this BS. China and US
had been allies and friends; both side made huge sacrifices
for each other 70 years ago. 70 years later, we owe each
other peace and respect. Republican and Democrats,
both parties had helped China in her times of need in the past,
China should acknowledge that.
China and US should continue as allies and friends, but we
must build trust and bridges between the two to weather
the storms of future. And there will be storms in the
future.
我会挨砖, 但是换一句话说:
华裔的核心利益不是AA, 而是在政法上的地位和中美关系。
如果两位政客
A: for AA, 不主张中国威胁论,
B: against AA,但宣扬中国威胁论。
我选A)。 AA 可以是机会,可以促使华裔参政:
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/SanFrancisco/34105921.html
应该看看这篇文章,想想他们的论点其实可以用来支持
华裔打入管理高层与法律高层:
http://usnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2014/01/08/22231509-obama-admin
但是中国威胁论根本上威胁中美和平, 必须坚决抵制。
日本最近的动向:联印反华,可能联朝反华
http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/SanFrancisco/34107543.html | j****y 发帖数: 1714 | 2 所以利益都有争。哪个是核心不好判断。
有些时候需要农村包围城市,从边缘着手,才能水到渠成挣取核心利益。
we
【在 o**********e 的大作中提到】 : 【 以下文字转载自 SanFrancisco 讨论区 】 : 发信人: onetiemyshoe (onetiemyshoe), 信区: SanFrancisco : 标 题: 华裔的核心利益不是AA : 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Wed Feb 12 13:31:49 2014, 美东) : 华裔的核心利益是中美关系。 西方盛行的中国威胁论是日本右翼 : 精心培植,给美国人洗脑的舆论武器。 代表人为: : JK: "We owe the Chinese a lot of money 1.3 trillion dollars, what should we : do about it?" : Ro Khanna: China's manufacturing is a huge threat. (Actually, Japan and : India are both greater rivals on various front to the US)
|
|