h*****a
发帖数: 1992 | 1 So much detail... It has to be true.
Note the date of the page is Jul 3, Saturday.... that's probably for
tomorrow paper...
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704911704575326753200584006.html?mod=e2tw | V*****n
发帖数: 893 | 2 the man is a better rider and a better doper. what not to love? to me,
selling out a friend is a lot worse than systematic doping. | I****9
发帖数: 5245 | | w********6
发帖数: 12977 | 4 I also finished reading this, though nothing surprises me
To me Lance is always one of the greatest rider and one of my idols | w*****h
发帖数: 1770 | 5 Floyd Landis cheated and lied, tried to get back to pro cycling but failed.
Now with nothing to lose anymore, he spoke out. It is too late to public
eyes as he has already lost all his credibility. | h******2
发帖数: 1498 | 6 LA doped, so did Leipheimer and Hincapie, what's new? the question is who
gets caught. Landis is dumb for being caught and shooting himself in the
foot like that.
doping or not, it's really irrelevant. as long as the return outweighs the
risk of being caught, there will always be doping.
btw, I think LA paid big bucks to have an exclusive contract with Ferrari.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michele_Ferrari | j********l
发帖数: 551 | 7 I read the whole thing and believe that likely most of it, if not
all, is true. What is surprising is that I always thought Armstrong
has some really clever way of doping because he never got caught,
unlike most of his opponents, Ulrich, Basso, Hamilton, ...
From Landis' description, it is mainly just blood doping and
testosterone patches for recovery. (Armstrong's allegedly admitted
usage of EPO was probably still before Landis' time.) The thing is,
those stuff are well know and were probably q
【在 h*****a 的大作中提到】
: So much detail... It has to be true.
: Note the date of the page is Jul 3, Saturday.... that's probably for
: tomorrow paper...
: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704911704575326753200584006.html?mod=e2tw
| O****e
发帖数: 3290 | 8 Personally, I don't like this kind of media exposure before the
investigation and would not believe any of it. It does more harm to the
sport than doping itself. Don't forget these cyclists have undergone so many
tests probably more than any other sport. Especially Lance has even more.
This means and weighs much more to me than these unfounded reports.
Well you could argue that the anti-doping method cannot keep up with drug
development. Again, this is your speculation. To me what is more import |
| h******2
发帖数: 1498 | 9 hoho, this story is on the front page of WSJ today :)
sex (strippers), drugs (cocaine), & rock'n roll (Sheryl Crow), winner sure takes all.
and LA strikes back this morning:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703881504575344550619265416.html?KEYWORDS=doping
Armstrong Addresses Latest Landis Allegations
By JOHN W. MILLER
ROTTERDAM, Netherlands — Lance Armstrong struck back at the latest allegations of former cycling teammate Floyd Landis that Mr. Armstrong and other members of the U.S |
|
