boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
Donation版 - 要捐款的,请速停
相关主题
向美国以外的机构捐款可抵税吗?
Matching Gift Program 简介 (转载)
捐给ocef的能免税吗,在1040里哪一line可以显示出来
国难当头,行重于言 (转载)
看不惯那些国难当头,依然在幸灾乐祸者
请别再问捐款途径而争吵!!!!!!!!!!
请把这个Poster到处张贴和分发!
(zz)清华大学学生献血和募捐的一些数据
看看这个密苏里的人渣说的话
强烈反对与地震无关贴上首页置顶
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: tax话题: 33%话题: deduction话题: bracket话题: rate
进入Donation版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
c********n
发帖数: 104
1
各位,国难当头,捐点钱是应该的。但是怎么捐钱可大有差别。
比如,一个UCLA的PHD,奖学金.要捐$100.
方法1: 直接给中国红十字会.
方法2: 他在弯曲的大哥,年收入$500000,TAX 是Itemized deduction,
triggered AMT,税率是33%。他把钱给大哥,他大哥转捐给中国红十字会,his
brother also match 33%。这样一来,灾区的孤儿共得$133.同时,他大哥明年报
税,claim $33.
Basically, 如果你是Standardized deduction, 请找到身边的同事亲友,给他cash,
并让他match 33%. 如此,更多的钱会送到灾区.
注意,请各位金融界人事,提供TAX Advise, 并告诉大家有Federal Tax benefit 的慈
善机构.
如果你同意,请RE上十大.不同意,请指教.
I lived in Irvine,CA area. I will talk to my friends about this. But if you
don't know me, don't bother
w***h
发帖数: 3343
2
哦?谢谢提供信息。
y*****a
发帖数: 580
3
That is good suggestion, but I have something more to say.
1. Use company matching if possible, for example, one XD said his company
match 300%, then why not make the maximum contribution thru that program?
If he has friends in his company willing to do this, that will be better and
powerful.
2. For tax purpose, not all donation, if in a large value would be itemized.
So if in your case, his wealth brother matching 33%, it could end-up being
goodwilling as he cannot claim 33% back (of course

【在 c********n 的大作中提到】
: 各位,国难当头,捐点钱是应该的。但是怎么捐钱可大有差别。
: 比如,一个UCLA的PHD,奖学金.要捐$100.
: 方法1: 直接给中国红十字会.
: 方法2: 他在弯曲的大哥,年收入$500000,TAX 是Itemized deduction,
: triggered AMT,税率是33%。他把钱给大哥,他大哥转捐给中国红十字会,his
: brother also match 33%。这样一来,灾区的孤儿共得$133.同时,他大哥明年报
: 税,claim $33.
: Basically, 如果你是Standardized deduction, 请找到身边的同事亲友,给他cash,
: 并让他match 33%. 如此,更多的钱会送到灾区.
: 注意,请各位金融界人事,提供TAX Advise, 并告诉大家有Federal Tax benefit 的慈

y*****a
发帖数: 580
4
depends on the tax bracket. At very high income, it could be as high as 38%.
It also depends on how large of the itemized deductible it would be (the
larger the smaller as only fraction of those deductible can be counted). I
would say for most people, 15% is a more proper figure.
p**q
发帖数: 535
5
deduction rate比Fed tax bracket高
Fed tax bracket 25%左右 deduction差不多是33%
举个例子 donate$100 少缴税50k*20%-49.9K*19.8%=$33 而不是$20
y*****a
发帖数: 580
6
I don't think it could be right.
1. tax bracket, I mean marginal tax bracket, not the average tax rate.
2. the person may have already caped the itemized deductible and beginning
phasing out (only a fraction can be counted) even without the donation.
As a result, the deductible is AT THE MOST the marginal tax bracket. I
think for most people, 15% is more proper than any guess above 25%.
Tax is not counted as the way you are saying:
50k*20% -49.9%*19.8% = 33.
Copied from 2007 1040 from IRS:
ta

【在 p**q 的大作中提到】
: deduction rate比Fed tax bracket高
: Fed tax bracket 25%左右 deduction差不多是33%
: 举个例子 donate$100 少缴税50k*20%-49.9K*19.8%=$33 而不是$20

p**q
发帖数: 535
7
我们说的是一个意思 hehe
你的例子税率13.4% donate $100. save $15 tax
deduction rate(我自己发明的 用来探讨一下而已) 15%
刚刚看了几篇关于捐款的置顶文章
如果等到现在就改捐tsinghua foundation了 有tax deduction
http://tsinghuafoundation.org/earthquake08/index.html

【在 y*****a 的大作中提到】
: I don't think it could be right.
: 1. tax bracket, I mean marginal tax bracket, not the average tax rate.
: 2. the person may have already caped the itemized deductible and beginning
: phasing out (only a fraction can be counted) even without the donation.
: As a result, the deductible is AT THE MOST the marginal tax bracket. I
: think for most people, 15% is more proper than any guess above 25%.
: Tax is not counted as the way you are saying:
: 50k*20% -49.9%*19.8% = 33.
: Copied from 2007 1040 from IRS:
: ta

y*****a
发帖数: 580
8
If that is the case, then the 33% average tax rate requires income at around
1.9 Million, 28% requires $400k, 25% requires $260k. I would say it is
higher than most of our annual income.
thanks.

【在 p**q 的大作中提到】
: 我们说的是一个意思 hehe
: 你的例子税率13.4% donate $100. save $15 tax
: deduction rate(我自己发明的 用来探讨一下而已) 15%
: 刚刚看了几篇关于捐款的置顶文章
: 如果等到现在就改捐tsinghua foundation了 有tax deduction
: http://tsinghuafoundation.org/earthquake08/index.html

p**q
发帖数: 535
9
还是married couple税率低
single donate$100
算AGI 60k
fed tax
60,000 11,344
59,900 11,319
save $25
再加state 差不多save $30-33

around

【在 y*****a 的大作中提到】
: If that is the case, then the 33% average tax rate requires income at around
: 1.9 Million, 28% requires $400k, 25% requires $260k. I would say it is
: higher than most of our annual income.
: thanks.

s*****c
发帖数: 753
10
Please read the last page of the IRS 2007 tax table: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i1040tt.pdf
your taxable income (after those exemption and deduction), the portion
between
$0 - $7825 tax rate is 10%
then for the rest of the taxable income
$7826-31850 tax rate is 15%
$31850-77100 tax rate is 25%
$77100 - 160850 tax rate is 28%
I believe for most working people, they will have some income that is taxed
at 25% -28%. So the donation only cost donation_amount * (1-25%).

around

【在 y*****a 的大作中提到】
: If that is the case, then the 33% average tax rate requires income at around
: 1.9 Million, 28% requires $400k, 25% requires $260k. I would say it is
: higher than most of our annual income.
: thanks.

1 (共1页)
进入Donation版参与讨论
相关主题
强烈反对与地震无关贴上首页置顶
买买提的捐款版面终于上报了 (转载)
国难当头,求同存异!
想知道那个王千源MM现在在做什么?
[email protected]捐款使用方面的问题 - 要反思总结
Question about paypal
aidmatrix.org刚刚设立CHINA EARTHQUAKE专项捐款
到底捐给哪个机构最好啊??
American Red Cross最新网页,可以给中国地震捐款了(Tax Deductible)
说说我为啥捐给SVTN
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: tax话题: 33%话题: deduction话题: bracket话题: rate