|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r****e
发帖数: 3109 | | k*******0
发帖数: 256 | | m****u
发帖数: 16 | 3 Rockme got the point.
Let's look at the demand data just released as of 10/01/2010.
The EB2-C demand prior ro 01/01/2006 is 52, and the number is 98 from 01/01/
2006 to 05/01/2006. The total number prior to 05/01/2006 is 150, which means
additional 100 can be subtracted from the demand data of 05/2006, which is
445. If 250 visa number is issued for EB2-C each month, then cut-off date
for the month of 10/2010 for EB2-C will be around 05/08/2006-05/15/2010, and
Mr. O set it to be 5/22/2006 to give some extra room. For 11/2010, the cut-
off date for EB2-C should be 5/22/2006 or 06/01/2006. So Mr. O set EB2-C
priority date strictly according to the "rule" of 250/month.
For EB2-I, the demand data prior to 01/01/2004 is 248, and 251 in the year
of 2004, and 756 in the year of 2005. The total demand number for EB2-I
prior to 05/01/2006 is 1678. If Mr. O plays a fair game for both EB2-C and
EB2-I, then he should set the cut-off date for 10/2010 to be 01/01/2004 for
EB2-I, and 01/01/2005 for 11/2010. Instead, he set EB2-I priority date
unchanged at 05/08/2006, which gives EB2-I unfair advantage of using up its
annual quota much faster than EB2-C.
In conclusion, Mr. O didn't play the game fairly by treating EB2-C and EB2-I
differently.
In fact, the recent released demand data from USCIS is a great opportunity
for EB2-C to have its monthly visa number increased from just 250/month.
Maybe NIU/LIA/P838/P8388 can communicate this with Mr.O. | Q*K
发帖数: 3464 | 4 Yes. O does not want to get trouble from Indians
We should push O to use our own quota faster
【在 r****e 的大作中提到】
: 这不是明目张胆对排期的原则的蔑视吗？
| I******6
发帖数: 500 | 5 A3 绝对应该 倒退才对。 另外 你们从哪里看出 中国是 每个月250 。 每年2803人，
那么每个月只有233 人呀？
【在 Q*K 的大作中提到】
: Yes. O does not want to get trouble from Indians
: We should push O to use our own quota faster
| r****e
发帖数: 3109 | 6 看楼上
【在 k*******0 的大作中提到】
: 你到底想说什么？
| m****u
发帖数: 16 | 7 Look at my post last October
01/
means
is
and
cut-
【在 m****u 的大作中提到】
: Rockme got the point.
: Let's look at the demand data just released as of 10/01/2010.
: The EB2-C demand prior ro 01/01/2006 is 52, and the number is 98 from 01/01/
: 2006 to 05/01/2006. The total number prior to 05/01/2006 is 150, which means
: additional 100 can be subtracted from the demand data of 05/2006, which is
: 445. If 250 visa number is issued for EB2-C each month, then cut-off date
: for the month of 10/2010 for EB2-C will be around 05/08/2006-05/15/2010, and
: Mr. O set it to be 5/22/2006 to give some extra room. For 11/2010, the cut-
: off date for EB2-C should be 5/22/2006 or 06/01/2006. So Mr. O set EB2-C
: priority date strictly according to the "rule" of 250/month.
| c*********0
发帖数: 97 | 8 烙印用完自己每月的名额，就应该倒退。
中印待遇明显不同。 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
