s****t
发帖数: 427 | | a******s
发帖数: 598 | | s****t
发帖数: 427 | 3 worldwide.
the chart is easy to use for comparison though the data has been released the year before.
2010 2009 2008
Category Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Employment-based 148,343 14.2 140,903 12.5 164,741 14.9
eb1 41,055 3.9 40,924 3.6 36,678 3.3
eb2 53,946 5.2 45,552 4.0 70,046 6.3
eb3 39,762 3.8 40,398 3.6 48,903 4.4
eb4 11,100 1.1 10,341 0.9 7,754 0.7
eb5 2,480 0.2 3,688 0.3 1,360 0.1 | j*e
发帖数: 1987 | 4 FB，EB名额都没用满啊？
See last page, table Annual Limits for Preference and Diversity Immigrants:
Fiscal Year 2010 | b***y
发帖数: 554 | 5 Interesting. overall, more Chinese than Indian and more female than male.
don't see any bias against the Chinese.
【
在 sepict (buddy) 的大作中提到: 】
http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/statistics/publications/lpr_ | j*e
发帖数: 1987 | 6 7% only apply to EB+FB中的Family-sponsored preferences。FB包括Family-
sponsored preferences和Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens两类，后者人数是
前者的两倍多，后者不算在7%的base里。中国总人数多是因为后者以及政治庇护和难民
类的多。
我们说的 bias against the Chinese是特指EB里面的bias。 | w**t
发帖数: 893 | 7 Based on this, arguments for bias of Chinese eb is not strongly justifiable
since people will alway refer to the whole
number.
【在 j*e 的大作中提到】
: 7% only apply to EB+FB中的Family-sponsored preferences。FB包括Family-
: sponsored preferences和Immediate relatives of U.S. citizens两类，后者人数是
: 前者的两倍多，后者不算在7%的base里。中国总人数多是因为后者以及政治庇护和难民
: 类的多。
: 我们说的 bias against the Chinese是特指EB里面的bias。
| j*e
发帖数: 1987 | 8 eb就是eb，refer to the whole number没有用。
justifiable
【在 w**t 的大作中提到】
: Based on this, arguments for bias of Chinese eb is not strongly justifiable
: since people will alway refer to the whole
: number.
|
|
