c*********n
发帖数: 1371 | 1 你在前面的帖子里说过， SO 如果大于485 demand,那余下的就流向CP.
可是CP的排期不是和美国国内的一样么？有人贴数据说明从08年到10年中
印的CP加起来也没多少，如果排期只是到08年，那CP也用不了几个名额啊。 | r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 2 yes, only 1000 EB2 China CP demand and 3000 EB2 Indian CP demand before 2010.
If they have some Spillover that can not be used, they may advance PD in a
bigger step and let the CP demand to consume them.
Based on my understanding, a visa number is assigned/used as far as you
finish your interview. Although they need some time to do your name check,
this visa number is considered consumption. The approval rate of CP is very
high. It's different from AOS. AOS consumes a visa number when the case is
approved.
For example, if there are 11000 spillover for the next two months and only 10000 AOS demand (newly submitted AOS is not ready yet), 11000-10000=1000, then they will move the PD in the last month to allocate the 1000 number to CP.
【在 c*********n 的大作中提到】
: 你在前面的帖子里说过， SO 如果大于485 demand,那余下的就流向CP.
: 可是CP的排期不是和美国国内的一样么？有人贴数据说明从08年到10年中
: 印的CP加起来也没多少，如果排期只是到08年，那CP也用不了几个名额啊。
| c*********n
发帖数: 1371 | 3 谢谢，换句话说，如果有多于4000的SO需要流行向cp,那么排期就必须current
理论上是这样的么？
2010.
very
10000 AOS demand (newly submitted AOS is not ready yet), 11000-10000=1000,
then they will move the PD in the last month to allocate the 1000 number to
CP.
【在 r********n 的大作中提到】
: yes, only 1000 EB2 China CP demand and 3000 EB2 Indian CP demand before 2010.
: If they have some Spillover that can not be used, they may advance PD in a
: bigger step and let the CP demand to consume them.
: Based on my understanding, a visa number is assigned/used as far as you
: finish your interview. Although they need some time to do your name check,
: this visa number is considered consumption. The approval rate of CP is very
: high. It's different from AOS. AOS consumes a visa number when the case is
: approved.
: For example, if there are 11000 spillover for the next two months and only 10000 AOS demand (newly submitted AOS is not ready yet), 11000-10000=1000, then they will move the PD in the last month to allocate the 1000 number to CP.
| a***n
发帖数: 665 | 4 rocketsfan,
is DOS required to move PD to the same date btw CP and AOS?
"...then they will move the PD in the last month to allocate th"e 1000
number to CP."
2010.
very
10000 AOS demand (newly submitted AOS is not ready yet), 11000-10000=1000,
then they will move the PD in the last month to allocate the 1000 number to
CP.
【在 r********n 的大作中提到】
: yes, only 1000 EB2 China CP demand and 3000 EB2 Indian CP demand before 2010.
: If they have some Spillover that can not be used, they may advance PD in a
: bigger step and let the CP demand to consume them.
: Based on my understanding, a visa number is assigned/used as far as you
: finish your interview. Although they need some time to do your name check,
: this visa number is considered consumption. The approval rate of CP is very
: high. It's different from AOS. AOS consumes a visa number when the case is
: approved.
: For example, if there are 11000 spillover for the next two months and only 10000 AOS demand (newly submitted AOS is not ready yet), 11000-10000=1000, then they will move the PD in the last month to allocate the 1000 number to CP.
| r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 5 yes, AOS and CP share the same date.
,
to
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】
: rocketsfan,
: is DOS required to move PD to the same date btw CP and AOS?
: "...then they will move the PD in the last month to allocate th"e 1000
: number to CP."
:
: 2010.
: very
: 10000 AOS demand (newly submitted AOS is not ready yet), 11000-10000=1000,
: then they will move the PD in the last month to allocate the 1000 number to
: CP.
| r********n
发帖数: 1162 | 6 From the theory, you are correct. Actually that's why Mr.O set PD current in
2007. His excuse was that he wanted to let the CP consume left visa numbers
. In that summer, more than 17k EB3 Indians got GC. Some of them got from CP.
But because it is a black box, so you never know what they will do. Mr.O can
find 1000 reasons for his choice, hehe.
,
to
【在 c*********n 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢，换句话说，如果有多于4000的SO需要流行向cp,那么排期就必须current
: 理论上是这样的么？
:
: 2010.
: very
: 10000 AOS demand (newly submitted AOS is not ready yet), 11000-10000=1000,
: then they will move the PD in the last month to allocate the 1000 number to
: CP.
| a***n
发帖数: 665 | 7 agreed, as the indian bbs said: law is as O interprets ;)
in
numbers
CP.
can
【在 r********n 的大作中提到】
: From the theory, you are correct. Actually that's why Mr.O set PD current in
: 2007. His excuse was that he wanted to let the CP consume left visa numbers
: . In that summer, more than 17k EB3 Indians got GC. Some of them got from CP.
: But because it is a black box, so you never know what they will do. Mr.O can
: find 1000 reasons for his choice, hehe.
:
: ,
: to
|
|
