N*********L
发帖数: 517 | 1 大家好！
目前NIU的485递交项目小组需要和一位DHS的官员联系，但是相关内容需要一些数据支
持，希望知情者能提供帮助。具体如下：
大家有没有从2007大潮以后到现在为止，已经提交了140， 但是不能交上485的人数？
我希望有这样一个数据，可以在和该官员交流的时候，让他直观的感受到现在这个
backlog的严重程度。这样他才会有兴趣去关心我们的提前交485的问题。从他的角度，
如果他的议案通过了，也是他的政绩。
我希望找到的数据类似这样的
1。从大潮开始到下一年， 交了140， 但是不能交485的
2。大潮开始到下两年，交了140， 但是不能交485的
3。。。。
这样的对比比较清楚。
谢谢！
New Immigrants United
3500 Woodchase Dr. Apt 1735, Houston, TX 77042
Email: c*****[email protected]
组织网站 http://www.niunational.org => http://niunational.com
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/New-Immigrants-United/141057712630445 | p***7
发帖数: 535 | 2 I wish I could help you.But.... I submitted 140 in 2010 and not think
anything about 485 yet.
Ding. | p***7
发帖数: 535 | 3 I am new here. Somebody else may help you.
Thanks for the excellent work that you and your group have done!
Hopefully our proposal could be accepted! | k****k
发帖数: 3322 | | H******i
发帖数: 4704 | 5 因为PERM批了后必须很快file I-140,所以可以用PERM批复人数来代替I-140批复人数，
两者相差应该很小。下图中2007下半年的数字是估计的，其余的（2008-2011）都是劳工部的数据。从2007年七月到现在大致估计应该有一万四千中国人批了I-140，带家属应该有两万人以上无法递交I-485. 印度人有将近十万批了I-140,带家属应该有近二十万，是中国人的十倍。 | s***r
发帖数: 1121 | 6 Take 200,000 as total and assume the average salary is 60,000. So far these
poor people have paid taxes about $3 billion (200,000 x 60,000 x 0.25,
assuming 25% tax rate).
Correct me if I am wrong.
Also assume these 200,000 belong to 40,000 families. And each family bought a
house with the average price of 200,000 - these poor people have contributed
$8 billion into the GDP.
Also assume 5% of these 200,000 would have started up a small business
(not mentioning sth like GOOGLE or facebook) - that is 10,000 businesses.
Assuming each business hires 3 persons with annual gross sales 500,000. The
USA would have lost $5 billion total revenue and would have created 50,000
more new jobs.
I suggest we focus on the contributions to this country, to the economy, and
to the job creation. | a*******d
发帖数: 4846 | 7 工作的应该没有20W，应该就是PERM的数字(~10W)，税收去掉deduction乱七八糟的，
6W的薪水，加上SS和MED之后，有效税率应该在15%左右。呵呵，算起来真的不多。
these
bought a
contributed
【在 s***r 的大作中提到】
: Take 200,000 as total and assume the average salary is 60,000. So far these
: poor people have paid taxes about $3 billion (200,000 x 60,000 x 0.25,
: assuming 25% tax rate).
: Correct me if I am wrong.
: Also assume these 200,000 belong to 40,000 families. And each family bought a
: house with the average price of 200,000 - these poor people have contributed
: $8 billion into the GDP.
: Also assume 5% of these 200,000 would have started up a small business
: (not mentioning sth like GOOGLE or facebook) - that is 10,000 businesses.
: Assuming each business hires 3 persons with annual gross sales 500,000. The
| s***r
发帖数: 1121 | 8 No, you are wrong. You have to exaggerate here. Remember this is the
politics, not science.
【在 a*******d 的大作中提到】
: 工作的应该没有20W，应该就是PERM的数字(~10W)，税收去掉deduction乱七八糟的，
: 6W的薪水，加上SS和MED之后，有效税率应该在15%左右。呵呵，算起来真的不多。
:
: these
: bought a
: contributed
| a*******d
发帖数: 4846 | 9 I am totally fine with exaggerating, and I am fine even with bigger number
when communicate with average US ppl to show how important we are-:)
【在 s***r 的大作中提到】
: No, you are wrong. You have to exaggerate here. Remember this is the
: politics, not science.
| p********y
发帖数: 412 | 10 还要加上NIW的人吧。这个能按往年的比例估一个吧 |
|
