由买买提看人间百态

boards

本页内容为未名空间相应帖子的节选和存档,一周内的贴子最多显示50字,超过一周显示500字 访问原贴
EB23版 - 为火箭扇和CNUS修改请愿信
相关主题
revised letter to congressman on 27% limitation issue - pl到底有多少人真正打过电话?
27% 议员回信答非所问,准备follow up, 各位参考一下Unused Visa Numbers for EB-2s from India and China
从4/15跳到7/15是为了建立库存吗?LIA 从移民律师协会获得的五月排期之最新消息
现在批准的,究竟是用什么名额[通知] EB3C诉讼西雅图9月15日庭辩改期至9月27日
关于征集签名的一点点建议why DOS has not published annual report for the actual approval data in FY 2010 (last fiscal year)?
老O的信箱是什么?我要发信问问他EB2IC捆绑的事USCIS Response to Ombudsman’s 2010 Annual Report
From CNUS, we can see that.....demand data out
2012财年EB2名额用完的消息-(附三种解读)visa bulletin的阅读理解。欢迎砖头指教
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: visa话题: based话题: quota话题: annual话题: usage
进入EB23版参与讨论
1 (共1页)
H******i
发帖数: 4704
1
27%乘以4大于百分一百,逻辑上容易受伤,我改成了a miminum of 25%,其他
高手请出手从其他方面修改加强。为了鼓励大家,特发链接京城太子们的生活一窥。
http://www.wenxuecity.com/news/2011/09/07/1464721.html
According to the data published by USCIS regarding the consumption of visa
numbers for permanent residence, DOS visa office obviously has been
discriminating employment-based petitioners in favor of family-based
petitioners.
The data below illustrates that the DOS visa office has been allocating
visas to family-based petitioners in a more aggressive manner than to
employment-based petitioners. As a result, when a spill over is available,
employment-based petitioners find themselves very difficult to access the
unused visa numbers from other immigration categories. We urge the DOS to
quarterly assign a minimum of 25% of annual visa quota to employment based
applicants.
Employment Based:
Q1: total visa usage 24,040, only 17% of annual quota.
Q2: total visa usage 21,944, only 15% of annual quota.
Q3: total visa usage 36,128, only 25% of annual quota.
Family Based:
Q1: total visa usage 62,955, 27.9% of annual quota
Q2: total visa usage 69,730, 30.9% of annual quota
Q3: total visa usage 67,480, 29.9% of annual quota
f********s
发帖数: 416
2
数据用表格是不是更清楚一些?

【在 H******i 的大作中提到】
: 27%乘以4大于百分一百,逻辑上容易受伤,我改成了a miminum of 25%,其他
: 高手请出手从其他方面修改加强。为了鼓励大家,特发链接京城太子们的生活一窥。
: http://www.wenxuecity.com/news/2011/09/07/1464721.html
: According to the data published by USCIS regarding the consumption of visa
: numbers for permanent residence, DOS visa office obviously has been
: discriminating employment-based petitioners in favor of family-based
: petitioners.
: The data below illustrates that the DOS visa office has been allocating
: visas to family-based petitioners in a more aggressive manner than to
: employment-based petitioners. As a result, when a spill over is available,

1 (共1页)
进入EB23版参与讨论
相关主题
visa bulletin的阅读理解。欢迎砖头指教关于征集签名的一点点建议
如果职业移民没被歧视,第一季度VB就能过2008老O的信箱是什么?我要发信问问他EB2IC捆绑的事
烙印的分析关于季度分配From CNUS, we can see that.....
请大家如此反驳国务院的只有上限没有下限的悖论2012财年EB2名额用完的消息-(附三种解读)
revised letter to congressman on 27% limitation issue - pl到底有多少人真正打过电话?
27% 议员回信答非所问,准备follow up, 各位参考一下Unused Visa Numbers for EB-2s from India and China
从4/15跳到7/15是为了建立库存吗?LIA 从移民律师协会获得的五月排期之最新消息
现在批准的,究竟是用什么名额[通知] EB3C诉讼西雅图9月15日庭辩改期至9月27日
相关话题的讨论汇总
话题: visa话题: based话题: quota话题: annual话题: usage