m******t
发帖数: 4077 | | s*****l
发帖数: 321 | 2 想推没推动
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
: 为什么不致力于解除中印捆绑？
| H******i
发帖数: 4704 | 3 我在去年就被奥本拒绝了。下面是他的原信。我给他的信无比长，又打比喻（用排队进游泳池做比喻），又套关系，又威胁这么捆绑不公平将来有人要告他，就不公布了。
http://www.niunational.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=371&ext
奥本回信拒绝了我按照国别分配剩余名额的要求
Allocation of “otherwise unused” number as they relate to your pool example. INA Section 202(a)(5) provides that if total demand is insufficient to use all available numbers in the Employment First and Second preference, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual per-country limits for a country which is considered to be “oversubscribed”. Since under INA Section 203(e) such numbers must be provided strictly in priority date order regardless of chargeability, greater number use by one country would indicate greater demand by applicants from that country with earlier priority dates. As you point out India has more applicants, they typically have earlier priority dates, and as a result India has the potential to use more numbers.
【在 m******t 的大作中提到】
: 为什么不致力于解除中印捆绑？
|
|
