p****j
发帖数: 4762 | 1 如果我的485交上去半年再换工作，是不是只能在相同领域换？如何判断相同领域？
原来是做IT,后来做硬件EE, 这个算相同/相似领域吗？ |
B*****g
发帖数: 34098 | 2 悬
【在 p****j 的大作中提到】
: 如果我的485交上去半年再换工作，是不是只能在相同领域换？如何判断相同领域？
: 原来是做IT,后来做硬件EE, 这个算相同/相似领域吗？
|
l****i
发帖数: 3339 | 3 Yes, similar field defined by job code.
I believe HR has a code for each job category.
【在 p****j 的大作中提到】
: 如果我的485交上去半年再换工作，是不是只能在相同领域换？如何判断相同领域？
: 原来是做IT,后来做硬件EE, 这个算相同/相似领域吗？
|
r**********u
发帖数: 1343 | 4 It is very tricky for similar fields.
sometimes from network to database is no.
sometimes from GUI to invest bank is yes.
It depends on how you can control the job description/title/job
responsibility. |
r**********u
发帖数: 1343 | 5 of course, job code should be the same. |
l****i
发帖数: 3339 | 6 包子 please
from USCIS 2005 memo
Question 3. What is “same or similar” occupational classification for
purposes of I-140
portability?
Answer: When making a determination if the new employment is the “same or
similar” occupational
classification in comparison to the employment in the initial I-140,
adjudicators should consider the
following factors:
A. Description of the job duties contained in the ETA 750A or the initial I-
140 and the job duties of
the new employment to determine if they are the “same or similar”
occupational classification.
B. The DOT code and/or SOC code assigned to the initial I-140 employment for
petitions that have
a certified ETA 750A or consider what DOT and/or SOC code is appropriate for
the position for
an initial I-140 that did not require a certified ETA 750A. Then consider
the DOT code and/or
SOC code, whichever is appropriate for the new position to make a
determination of “same or
similar” occupational classification.
C. A substantial discrepancy between the previous and the new wage. (See
Question 5 of this
section for further clarification). |
p****j
发帖数: 4762 | |
p****j
发帖数: 4762 | 8 我已经查过了，先前的工作是030， 要换的是003， 悲剧，不能换，惨。 |
