m*******l
发帖数: 12782 | 1 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
fakaoti08 (fakati08) 于 (Mon Nov 21 08:49:29 2011, 美东) 提到:
ALL ACTIONS:
9/22/2011:
Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
9/23/2011:
Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement.
10/27/2011:
Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
10/27/2011:
Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
11/18/2011 1:37pm:
Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 112-292.
11/18/2011 1:38pm:
Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 193.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
SinoGator (毛人弟弟) 于 (Mon Nov 21 08:58:52 2011, 美东) 提到:
Thanks for sharing!
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
alexx (panda in love~八胖~饲羊员~水木十年) 于 (Mon Nov 21 09:20:16 2011, 美东) 提到:
824呢？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Norwooder (Norwooder) 于 (Mon Nov 21 09:50:06 2011, 美东) 提到:
Any specific date?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
fakaoti08 (fakati08) 于 (Mon Nov 21 10:18:55 2011, 美东) 提到:
11/21/2011: H.R. 3012 Legislation Update: Placed on the House Union Calendar
No. 193 on 11/18/2011
This bill is now placed on the full House floor calendar. The specific date
has yet to be decided but it has at least been placed on calendar now. Those
who are not too familiar with the background and purpose of this bill and
voting records in the Committee may read the House Report 112-292. The bill
was amended in the final Judiciary Committee action accomodating Rep. Zoe
Lofgren's amendment. Since then, the number of sponsors of the bill
increased intial 2 to 11 Representatives. The final sponsors are: Rep Flake,
Jeff [AZ-6], Rep Goodlatte, Bob [VA-6], Rep Griffin, Tim [AR-2], Rep
Gutierrez, Luis V. [IL-4], Rep Holt, Rush D. [NJ-12], Rep Jackson, Jesse L.,
Jr. [IL-2], Rep Lofgren, Zoe [CA-16], Rep. Maloney, Carolyn B. [NY-14], Rep
Moran, James P. [VA-8], Rep Smith, Lamar [TX-21], and Rep Thompson, Glenn.
Joining of Rep. Luis Gutierez and Rep. Zoe Lofgren imply an important bi-
partisan bill, particularly Rep Gutierez who used to oppose piece-meal
employment-based immigration bills as a strong advocate of Comprehensive
Immibration Reform legislation. As soon as the specific floor schedule is
determined, we will report the date. Please stay tuned to this website.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
fakaoti08 (fakati08) 于 (Mon Nov 21 10:20:34 2011, 美东) 提到:
Union Calendar NO. 193 for HR 3012
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr3012rh/pdf/BILLS-112hr3
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wjhzwy (大刀耍关公) 于 (Mon Nov 21 10:34:21 2011, 美东) 提到:
没有考察过往纪录不敢下结论，但一个法案有了这么多sponsor 而且两党分布平均，通
过的机会应该很大吧？
Calendar
date
Those
bill
Flake,
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
MUYU (MUYU) 于 (Mon Nov 21 10:36:49 2011, 美东) 提到:
哪天vote呀？
Union Calendar NO. 193 for HR 3012http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr3012r........
★ Sent from iPhone App: iReader Mitbbs Lite 7.28
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Norwooder (Norwooder) 于 (Mon Nov 21 10:46:18 2011, 美东) 提到:
两党的所谓在移民话题上主要的重量级人物都在这儿，对吧。如是，应该是有很大希望
的吧。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wjhzwy (大刀耍关公) 于 (Mon Nov 21 10:49:37 2011, 美东) 提到:
看样子是有不少大哥级人物。
反过来考虑，如果这种形式都通不过的话那在可预见的未来不会有任何关于移民法的改
革提案能通过了。也许我太negative?
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Norwooder (Norwooder) 于 (Mon Nov 21 11:06:55 2011, 美东) 提到:
问题是，如果有阻力会是什么？
我想IV 一定做过很多的预演兵推。所以才有这些大老的聚合，参议院相同的议案的出
现。系统工程啊！
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
SinoGator (毛人弟弟) 于 (Mon Nov 21 11:10:25 2011, 美东) 提到:
老印这次显示了对游戏规则的熟悉程度
估计是分别拜访了这些议员 然后找出各自的诉求点 求同存异 才搞出了这么一个能为
多方接受的议案
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wjhzwy (大刀耍关公) 于 (Mon Nov 21 11:12:58 2011, 美东) 提到:
AGREE Act可能是个变数，里面乱七八糟的东西太多了。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Norwooder (Norwooder) 于 (Mon Nov 21 11:17:14 2011, 美东) 提到:
3012 的投票应该是在AGREE Act之前。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
SinoGator (毛人弟弟) 于 (Mon Nov 21 11:18:34 2011, 美东) 提到:
3012's official companion bill is S.1857. Unless they decided to merge S.
1857 with AGREE.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Norwooder (Norwooder) 于 (Mon Nov 21 11:23:57 2011, 美东) 提到:
The chance of AGREE act is really unknow; but i think the reason it includes
3012 is to balance the resistance of "piece meal" claim on 3012.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Norwooder (Norwooder) 于 (Mon Nov 21 11:28:14 2011, 美东) 提到:
The chance of AGREE act is really unknow; but i think the reason it includes
3012 is to balance the resistance of "piece meal" claim on 3012.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
coolaladdin (我喜欢油灯和戒指) 于 (Mon Nov 21 11:46:30 2011, 美东) 提到:
这也是我的看法。 烙印的团队能够把3012塞到agree里面，应该会考虑到这个法案可能
带来的正面和负面的影响。如果3012在agree之前投票，那就比较好理解了。成，则不
需要agree act,一旦不成，还可以再赌一把agree act.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
wjhzwy (大刀耍关公) 于 (Mon Nov 21 11:53:24 2011, 美东) 提到:
哦...原来是这么设计的.
我对三哥们的仰慕如滔滔江水连绵不绝 |
|
