s*******d
发帖数: 270 | 1 NIW 被RFE了，内容如下：
感觉准备的材料白交了，NIW三个点都要重新证明。请多提宝贵意见，准备DIY干。
National in scope:
The evidence submitted do not show how your accomplishments are of
substantial intrinsic merit, are national in scope or warrant the waiver of
a labor certificate. With that being said, it appears that the benefit of
your proposed employment is limited to that of your employer. No additional
evidence was submitted to established you would serve in the national
interest to a greater degree than a US worker with minimum qualifications.
You must establish that your proposed employment is national in scope.
Please submit evidence that your contributions will impart national-level
benefits.
Please submit the following evidence:
*submit evidence that clearly demonstrates the significance of your efforts
in the field. It should be evidence that the petitioner's findings have
enjoyed widespread implementation and acceptance by the scientific community.
The evidence should include, but is not limited to copies of
a) a patent and copyrights,
b) grant proposals
c) peer reviewed articles
d) work that has been cited and/or evaluated in independent journals and it
is noted that you have submitted peer reviewed articles and citations.
While the national interest waiver hinges on prospective benefit, it must be
clearly established that the petitioner's past record justifies projections
of future benefit to the nation....
Please submit evidence to establish that the petitioner's past record
justifies projections of future benefit to the nation and that the nation
interest would be adversely affected if the labor certification process was
used and evidence that your proposed employment can be considered to be
national in scope.
If the petitioner possesses any special skills, knowledge or abilities that
could not be articulated on an application for labor certification, the
petitioner must submit evidence to demonstrated these special skills,
knowledge or abilities. |
c********s
发帖数: 817 | |
f**s
发帖数: 968 | |
o******t
发帖数: 1994 | 4 以我的经历就是把材料重新组织，但是要言简意赅， 要点推荐信， 3封就够。 不要弄
的很长。利用RFE的顺序， 第一条是substantial intrinsic merit， 你的第一段就论
证这个， 充分利用RFE 里的例子， 列成条， 目的就是方便看的人。 5-6页纸， 甚至
更少， 足够了。 |
s*******d
发帖数: 270 | 5 请问你还准备了推荐信吗？
【在 f**s 的大作中提到】
: 和我的情况类似，请参考
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/EB23/31802763.html
: Bless...
|
s*******d
发帖数: 270 | 6 我已寄了6封，再凑3封似乎有点难。谢谢指点
【在 o******t 的大作中提到】
: 以我的经历就是把材料重新组织，但是要言简意赅， 要点推荐信， 3封就够。 不要弄
: 的很长。利用RFE的顺序， 第一条是substantial intrinsic merit， 你的第一段就论
: 证这个， 充分利用RFE 里的例子， 列成条， 目的就是方便看的人。 5-6页纸， 甚至
: 更少， 足够了。
|
s*******d
发帖数: 270 | 7 NIW 被RFE了，内容如下：
感觉准备的材料白交了，NIW三个点都要重新证明。请多提宝贵意见，准备DIY干。
National in scope:
The evidence submitted do not show how your accomplishments are of
substantial intrinsic merit, are national in scope or warrant the waiver of
a labor certificate. With that being said, it appears that the benefit of
your proposed employment is limited to that of your employer. No additional
evidence was submitted to established you would serve in the national
interest to a greater degree than a US worker with minimum qualifications.
You must establish that your proposed employment is national in scope.
Please submit evidence that your contributions will impart national-level
benefits.
Please submit the following evidence:
*submit evidence that clearly demonstrates the significance of your efforts
in the field. It should be evidence that the petitioner's findings have
enjoyed widespread implementation and acceptance by the scientific community.
The evidence should include, but is not limited to copies of
a) a patent and copyrights,
b) grant proposals
c) peer reviewed articles
d) work that has been cited and/or evaluated in independent journals and it
is noted that you have submitted peer reviewed articles and citations.
While the national interest waiver hinges on prospective benefit, it must be
clearly established that the petitioner's past record justifies projections
of future benefit to the nation....
Please submit evidence to establish that the petitioner's past record
justifies projections of future benefit to the nation and that the nation
interest would be adversely affected if the labor certification process was
used and evidence that your proposed employment can be considered to be
national in scope.
If the petitioner possesses any special skills, knowledge or abilities that
could not be articulated on an application for labor certification, the
petitioner must submit evidence to demonstrated these special skills,
knowledge or abilities. |
c********s
发帖数: 817 | |
f**s
发帖数: 968 | |
o******t
发帖数: 1994 | 10 以我的经历就是把材料重新组织，但是要言简意赅， 要点推荐信， 3封就够。 不要弄
的很长。利用RFE的顺序， 第一条是substantial intrinsic merit， 你的第一段就论
证这个， 充分利用RFE 里的例子， 列成条， 目的就是方便看的人。 5-6页纸， 甚至
更少， 足够了。 |
|
|
s*******d
发帖数: 270 | 11 请问你还准备了推荐信吗？
【在 f**s 的大作中提到】
: 和我的情况类似，请参考
: http://www.mitbbs.com/article_t/EB23/31802763.html
: Bless...
|
s*******d
发帖数: 270 | 12 我已寄了6封，再凑3封似乎有点难。谢谢指点
【在 o******t 的大作中提到】
: 以我的经历就是把材料重新组织，但是要言简意赅， 要点推荐信， 3封就够。 不要弄
: 的很长。利用RFE的顺序， 第一条是substantial intrinsic merit， 你的第一段就论
: 证这个， 充分利用RFE 里的例子， 列成条， 目的就是方便看的人。 5-6页纸， 甚至
: 更少， 足够了。
|
s*******d
发帖数: 270 | 13 重新组织了petiton letter言简意赅针对NIW三条标准，支持材料仍然使用原来的，没
有添加新的，也是尽量标示清楚。寄出3个星期不到获批。谢谢以上网友建议。希望对
以后的网友也有帮助。 |
S******s
发帖数: 1096 | 14 上次看到有人有相似的理由，全被质疑了，结果发现是IO把材料弄丢了，原封不动的寄
了一份过去1周就批了 |
f****D
发帖数: 4745 | |
