a*0
发帖数: 1029 | 1 https://washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/114_HR_213.html
Transition Rules for Employment-Based Immigrants-
(1) IN GENERAL- Subject to the succeeding paragraphs of this subsection and
notwithstanding title II of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.
1151 et seq.), the following rules shall apply:
(A) For fiscal year 2015, 15 percent of the immigrant visas made available
under each of paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C.
1153(b)) shall be allotted to immigrants who are natives of a foreign state
or dependent area that was not one of the two states with the largest
aggregate numbers of natives obtaining immigrant visas during fiscal year
2011 under such paragraphs.
(B) For fiscal year 2016, 10 percent of the immigrant visas made available
under each of such paragraphs shall be allotted to immigrants who are
natives of a foreign state or dependent area that was not one of the two
states with the largest aggregate numbers of natives obtaining immigrant
visas during fiscal year 2012 under such paragraphs.
(C) For fiscal year 2017, 10 percent of the immigrant visas made available
under each of such paragraphs shall be allotted to immigrants who are
natives of a foreign state or dependent area that was not one of the two
states with the largest aggregate numbers of natives obtaining immigrant
visas during fiscal year 2015 under such paragraphs.
(2) PER-COUNTRY LEVELS-
(A) RESERVED VISAS- With respect to the visas reserved under each of
subparagraphs (A) through (C) of paragraph (1), the number of such visas
made available to natives of any single foreign state or dependent area in
the appropriate fiscal year may not exceed 25 percent (in the case of a
single foreign state) or 2 percent (in the case of a dependent area) of the
total number of such visas.
(B) UNRESERVED VISAS- With respect to the immigrant visas made available
under each of paragraphs (2) and (3) of section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C.
1153(b)) and not reserved under paragraph (1), for each of fiscal years
2015, 2016, and 2017, not more than 85 percent shall be allotted to
immigrants who are natives of any single foreign state.
(3) SPECIAL RULE TO PREVENT UNUSED VISAS- If, with respect to fiscal year
2015, 2016, or 2017, the operation of paragraphs (1) and (2) of this
subsection would prevent the total number of immigrant visas made available
under paragraph (2) or (3) of section 203(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b))
from being issued, such visas may be issued during the remainder of such
fiscal year without regard to paragraphs (1) and (2) of this subsection.
(4) RULES FOR CHARGEABILITY- Section 202(b) of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(b))
shall apply in determining the foreign state to which an alien is chargeable
for purposes of this subsection.
， |
p******i
发帖数: 1358 | 2 因为以现在的国会，不可能通过任何Immigration 法案 |
a*0
发帖数: 1029 | 3 现在的形势，不应该以死马当活马医的精神来相信一切渠道的信息吗？国会如果没有任
何想法提这议案干啥？
难道只能死等
【在 p******i 的大作中提到】
: 因为以现在的国会，不可能通过任何Immigration 法案
|
w*l
发帖数: 933 | 4 我个人觉得：立法近两年到新总统上任是没戏了。
看看参议院，格老是立法委员会主席，塞老是其下属的移民委员会（塞老上任第一件事
就是改名为“移民与国家利益委员会”）的组长。这种阵势，能通过宽松移民政策的任
何法案？
【在 a*0 的大作中提到】
: 现在的形势，不应该以死马当活马医的精神来相信一切渠道的信息吗？国会如果没有任
: 何想法提这议案干啥？
: 难道只能死等
|
a*0
发帖数: 1029 | 5 h4ead,大家都说是uscis逗大家玩的，但是下个月就可以开始申请了；
140EAD，大家说绝对不会通过的，结果现在基本已经坐实，只差一个生效时间。
民主党这边如火如荼的搞，共和党绝对不能啥姿态都没有，如果有姿态，希望是HR213,
但这需要大家一起争取。
尼玛大家都是被虐待惯了吗？能不能积极乐观一点?
【在 w*l 的大作中提到】
: 我个人觉得：立法近两年到新总统上任是没戏了。
: 看看参议院，格老是立法委员会主席，塞老是其下属的移民委员会（塞老上任第一件事
: 就是改名为“移民与国家利益委员会”）的组长。这种阵势，能通过宽松移民政策的任
: 何法案？
|
N********E
发帖数: 303 | |
s********c
发帖数: 4152 | 7 习惯了
HR213,
【在 a*0 的大作中提到】
: h4ead,大家都说是uscis逗大家玩的，但是下个月就可以开始申请了；
: 140EAD，大家说绝对不会通过的，结果现在基本已经坐实，只差一个生效时间。
: 民主党这边如火如荼的搞，共和党绝对不能啥姿态都没有，如果有姿态，希望是HR213,
: 但这需要大家一起争取。
: 尼玛大家都是被虐待惯了吗？能不能积极乐观一点?
|
p******i
发帖数: 1358 | 8 奥巴马ea的基础是congress doesn't act
如果国会装模作样的搞213之类的法案，奥巴马这个孱头说不定会推迟合法部分的ea等
着国会行动
最后213和hr2013一样死掉，合法的两边都一场空
现在大家的best hope应该也是only hope就是obama的pre-registration，任何干扰这
个的都不是好事儿
【在 a*0 的大作中提到】
: 现在的形势，不应该以死马当活马医的精神来相信一切渠道的信息吗？国会如果没有任
: 何想法提这议案干啥？
: 难道只能死等
|
i*****9
发帖数: 698 | |
d*******p
发帖数: 2525 | 10 只有合法的，侯赛因绝对不可能签，而gop又没有veto proof的票数，所以没戏 |
|
|
o*******4
发帖数: 313 | 11 140EAD，大家说绝对不会通过的，结果现在基本已经坐实，只差一个生效时间。????
source??? in your dreams? |
z******y
发帖数: 969 | 12 不能说坐实， 但是基本上移民局在做了。上周的EMAIL细节已经有了， 生效应该只
是时间问题。
【在 o*******4 的大作中提到】
: 140EAD，大家说绝对不会通过的，结果现在基本已经坐实，只差一个生效时间。????
: source??? in your dreams?
|
z******y
发帖数: 969 | 13 罗玉凤穿高叉連身衣
【在 N********E 的大作中提到】
: 画面太美我不敢看
|
G***D
发帖数: 288 | 14 这些年被国会忽悠的次数还少吗
HR213,
【在 a*0 的大作中提到】
: h4ead,大家都说是uscis逗大家玩的，但是下个月就可以开始申请了；
: 140EAD，大家说绝对不会通过的，结果现在基本已经坐实，只差一个生效时间。
: 民主党这边如火如荼的搞，共和党绝对不能啥姿态都没有，如果有姿态，希望是HR213,
: 但这需要大家一起争取。
: 尼玛大家都是被虐待惯了吗？能不能积极乐观一点?
|
t********n
发帖数: 3178 | 15 什么email?求detail
【在 z******y 的大作中提到】
: 不能说坐实， 但是基本上移民局在做了。上周的EMAIL细节已经有了， 生效应该只
: 是时间问题。
|
f*****a
发帖数: 1026 | 16 dream!
【在 z******y 的大作中提到】
: 不能说坐实， 但是基本上移民局在做了。上周的EMAIL细节已经有了， 生效应该只
: 是时间问题。
|
z******y
发帖数: 969 | 17 好大，换了个名字，以为我不认识你了， DREAM你表妹的。
弹你蛋蛋。弹弹弹。
【在 f*****a 的大作中提到】
: dream!
|
z******y
发帖数: 969 | 18 If you wish to comment, you may do so by sending your thoughts to Public.
[email protected]
/* */ They are moving forward with administrative
changes and this is your opportunity to make your voice heard.
What are the most important policy and operational changes that would
streamline and improve the process of employment-based beneficiaries’
applying for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident
while in the United States?
a. What are some ideas for modernizing and improving the immigrant visa
process for employment-based beneficiaries?
USCIS is currently working with the Department of State to modify the Visa
Bulletin system to more simply and reliably make determinations of visa
availability. What are some ideas for modifying the Visa Bulletin system for
employment-based immigration?
If possible to extend employment authorization (EAD) eligibility to
beneficiaries of approved Form I-140 petitions who are unable to file for
adjustment of status due to visa unavailability, what should be the
timeframe after approving an I-140 petition for conferring an EAD?
Should a beneficiary’s priority date and porting eligibility be preserved
when the petitioner withdraws an otherwise approved or approvable I-140
petition and/or terminates its business? How should the portability
provisions be crafted to allow for this?
What are some ideas for improving how USCIS evaluates “same or similar” in
an AC21 analysis of two jobs?
a. Should USCIS implement an application process, which would include a form
and fee, to request AC21 portability (e.g. pre-adjudicate whether a new
position is the same or similar as the I-140 position)?
What are the concerns, if any, of Form I-140 petitioning employers with
regard to increasing the flexibility of USCIS’ analysis of INA 204(j)
portability?
What are the concerns, if any, of Form I-140 petitioning employers with
regard to increasing the flexibility of the Form I-140-related work
authorization eligibility for beneficiaries of approved Form I-140 petitions?
What are the concerns, if any, with satisfying the eligibility criteria for
EB-2 national interest waivers?
a. What are some ideas for standards for granting a national interest waiver
, including waivers for foreign inventors, researchers and founders of start
-up enterprises to benefit the U.S. economy?
********************************************************************
自己读吧。 细节蛮多的。 很明显USCIS要做这些事情。
【在 t********n 的大作中提到】
: 什么email?求detail
|
t********n
发帖数: 3178 | 19 看着不错，就是不知道得多久
/* */ They are moving forward with administrative
【在 z******y 的大作中提到】
: If you wish to comment, you may do so by sending your thoughts to Public.
: [email protected]
: /* */ They are moving forward with administrative
: changes and this is your opportunity to make your voice heard.
: What are the most important policy and operational changes that would
: streamline and improve the process of employment-based beneficiaries’
: applying for adjustment of status to that of a lawful permanent resident
: while in the United States?
: a. What are some ideas for modernizing and improving the immigrant visa
: process for employment-based beneficiaries?
|
a*0
发帖数: 1029 | 20 想让他快，大家都去给那个邮箱发信吧。
跟当时h4ead是一样，评论越多他们会认为越值得搞，也会越快。
评论Email的数量估计是他们收集民意，衡量要不要搞，值不值得搞，什么时候搞的一
个依据。
【在 t********n 的大作中提到】
: 看着不错，就是不知道得多久
:
: /* */ They are moving forward with administrative
|
|
|
c****t
发帖数: 34 | 21 这个是属于国会那边的，跟移民局属于两个分支。
要促进这个法案，应该写信或约谈自己区域的参众议员。
先不用考虑O8的问题。首先需要参众两院通过，才到得了O8的桌子上。而且O8只有一年
半就要下台了。法案通过两院恐怕都要这个时间。
【在 a*0 的大作中提到】
: 想让他快，大家都去给那个邮箱发信吧。
: 跟当时h4ead是一样，评论越多他们会认为越值得搞，也会越快。
: 评论Email的数量估计是他们收集民意，衡量要不要搞，值不值得搞，什么时候搞的一
: 个依据。
|
w**p
发帖数: 4080 | |
j********8
发帖数: 2201 | 23 这么跟你说吧，哥刚来美国读书的时。一次老板在开会很激动告诉学生说，最近国会在
讨论一个议案，以后工科博士毕业都直接拿美国绿卡(stamp to your passport)。大家
努力，毕业后有6位数的工资和绿卡在等着你们。
回头一看，这已经是10年前的事了。说好的绿卡还不知道要等多久。如果就此放弃了回
国，又感觉一件事情没有做完。即使回国，也要把它做完了再走。 |
