N********E
发帖数: 303 | |
N********E
发帖数: 303 | |
N********E
发帖数: 303 | 3 11/20/2015: USCIS Submits on 11/19/2015 Proposed Rule for Employment-Based
Immigration Modernization, aka Approved I-140 EAD/Portability
Yesterday, the USCIS officially submitted a proposed rule under the name of
"Retention of EB-1, EB-2, and EB-3 Immigrant Workers and Program
Improvements Affecting Highly-Skilled H-1B Alien Workers" to the OMB for its
approval. The text is yet to be made available. We will post the full text
as soon as it is made available. Please stay tuned.
Good News: This proposed rule is presented as "Economically Significant"
rule, meaning that OMB, if they agree, can clear it in a matter of days or
within 30 days rather than 60 days or 90 days. The time table for this
proposed rule is set at "December 2015!" Obviously, the proposed rule will
set "comment" period as required under the APA rule-making law in order to
initiate the interim final or final rule making process.
Rule-Making Justification Summary Statement: "This rule provides needed
stability and flexibility to certain employment-based immigrants while they
wait to become lawful permanent residents. These amendments would support U.
S. employers by better enabling them to hire and retain highly skilled and
other foreign workers. DHS proposes to accomplish this, in part, by
implementing certain provisions of ACWIA and AC21, as amended by the 21st
Century DOJ Appropriations Act. The 21st Century DOJ Appropriations
Authorization Act, which will impact certain foreign nationals seeking
permanent residency in the United States, as well as H-1B workers. Further,
by clarifying interpretive questions related to these provisions, this
rulemaking would ensure that DHS practice is consistent with statute."
Obama Administration is apparently taking a rule-making route rather than a
policy memorandum for a strategy to deal with a potential challenge against
this reform in a federal court. For the rule-making challenge, a legal
challenge must be venued in D.C. courts just as we saw in the H-4 EAD
lawsuit. The district courts in DC and the federal appeals court in DC are
considered Obama Administration friendly. During 113th Congress and 114th
Congress, Obama worked hard to appoint judges for these courts in DC
districts to set a firm foot to support his rule-making power under his
political agenda. Any court challenges should deal with a summary judgment
on merits of the lawsuit and either temporary restraining order or
preliminary injunction to stop the rule. For background of potential lawsuit
and prospect for such lawsuit, readers may go back and refresh their memory
on H-4 EAD rule challenge in DC court. This is different from legal
challenge against exercise of exective discretion without rule-making as
illustrated in expanded DACA/DAPA lawsuit for which a lawsuit could have
been brought in a court in Texas rather than in DC. Just a heads-up! |
t*******r
发帖数: 309 | 4 庆祝一下,先不管内容如何,能难产出来已经实属不易. |
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 5 我已经开始联系亲朋好友还有关系好的同事参加comments了。他们说一点法案publish
，他们就帮我们comments
30天之内肯定就出来了。
大家行动起来吧！！！ |
t*******r
发帖数: 309 | 6 对,一起行动起来.
publish
【在 X**J 的大作中提到】
: 我已经开始联系亲朋好友还有关系好的同事参加comments了。他们说一点法案publish
: ，他们就帮我们comments
: 30天之内肯定就出来了。
: 大家行动起来吧！！！
|
z**x
发帖数: 226 | 7 谁能说一下rule making procedure?
还有怎么参加comment? |
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 8 现在在奥巴马的桌子上，30天之内他会签字，签完以后就会有link.
到时候就可以comment了。 60 天comments,反响好的话，马上就实施了。
【在 z**x 的大作中提到】
: 谁能说一下rule making procedure?
: 还有怎么参加comment?
|
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 9 楼主，你能在title上加个 Breaking news 吗？
【在 N********E 的大作中提到】
: http://resultsocean.com/2015/05/21/breaking-news-ead-for-i140-p
: 尼玛刚好一年才开始rule making； 裤子都脱了你就叫我看这个？
|
z********8
发帖数: 255 | 10 会不会COMMENT之后反响好但是还有其他幺蛾子？
【在 X**J 的大作中提到】
: 现在在奥巴马的桌子上，30天之内他会签字，签完以后就会有link.
: 到时候就可以comment了。 60 天comments,反响好的话，马上就实施了。
|
|
|
z**x
发帖数: 226 | 11 为什么要等30天才签字？难道不是这30天comments么？还搞个之后60天comments，那不
是要3个月？
【在 X**J 的大作中提到】
: 现在在奥巴马的桌子上，30天之内他会签字，签完以后就会有link.
: 到时候就可以comment了。 60 天comments,反响好的话，马上就实施了。
|
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 12 反响好就没理由幺蛾子了。 h4 ead后来好像是被告了，但是也实施那么久了，而且告
了也没事。
据说这次opt 的负面评论很多，我们要加紧了。一旦regulation出来，我准备去各大学
校和华人网站post.
让我们用Positive 的comments 淹没反移民的声音。
【在 z********8 的大作中提到】
: 会不会COMMENT之后反响好但是还有其他幺蛾子？
|
g*******m
发帖数: 999 | |
h******n
发帖数: 109 | 14 OM不是奥巴马，rule making 不需要奥巴马签字。OMB是Office of Management and
Budget。
【在 X**J 的大作中提到】
: 现在在奥巴马的桌子上，30天之内他会签字，签完以后就会有link.
: 到时候就可以comment了。 60 天comments,反响好的话，马上就实施了。
|
s*******n
发帖数: 4402 | 15 1年已经很快了，美国的政策制定是以10年为标准的，不是光移民，都是这样的。去你
住的镇上或者城市里了解下，比如铺个路要多久。
【在 N********E 的大作中提到】
: http://resultsocean.com/2015/05/21/breaking-news-ead-for-i140-p
: 尼玛刚好一年才开始rule making； 裤子都脱了你就叫我看这个？
|
X**J
发帖数: 466 | 16 好吧，看来还是要去参加让他们快点签字的campaign
【在 h******n 的大作中提到】
: OM不是奥巴马，rule making 不需要奥巴马签字。OMB是Office of Management and
: Budget。
|
s*******n
发帖数: 4402 | 17 华盛顿的问题是有很多的政策大纲出来没有Budget，如果能有Budget就很不错了；有钱
就会干；
资本家就是这点好，不管什么党谁弄移改就给谁钱，大选前应该会动一动。
Budget。
【在 h******n 的大作中提到】
: OM不是奥巴马，rule making 不需要奥巴马签字。OMB是Office of Management and
: Budget。
|
t*******r
发帖数: 309 | 18 USCIS 这么有钱，基本上用不着上面一分钱来执行这个。
【在 s*******n 的大作中提到】
: 华盛顿的问题是有很多的政策大纲出来没有Budget，如果能有Budget就很不错了；有钱
: 就会干；
: 资本家就是这点好，不管什么党谁弄移改就给谁钱，大选前应该会动一动。
:
: Budget。
|
s*******n
发帖数: 4402 | 19 我的意思是，有Budget说明相对是Priority，
前几天有位说，需要职业移民参政才能帮助职业移民；其实职业移民的改革主要来自于
Tech Lobby, 大资本家见风使舵，哪个党做就给谁钱，民主党当然主要为了非法移民，
不要白不要，
大选前为了争取最多的选票，必须要让西裔和一部分资本家满意，而不仅仅是一年前为
了给非法移民遮遮，这应该是140-EAD的利益所在。
【在 h******n 的大作中提到】
: OM不是奥巴马，rule making 不需要奥巴马签字。OMB是Office of Management and
: Budget。
|
