F********r
发帖数: 1748 | 1 Furthermore, we are concerned with proposed 8 CFR §245.25(b)(2)(ii), which
requires “[a]n explanation from the new employer establishing that the new
employment offer and the employment offer under the approved petition are in
the same or similar occupational classification….” This requirement
imposes on employers an untenable duty to know and understand the details of
the previous employer’s position. Successor employers will likely not be
willing to attest to information that is not their own, and should not be
forced to do so. Again, the goal of achieving job flexibility is compromised
by imposing such a requirement on successor employers. Only the employee
should be involved in filing this form.
我认为是表面文章，做给我们这帮受害者看的。如果最后一句真能够被移民局采纳的话
，那这个J表也就不是个事了。等着看final rule是什么样的吧。 | l*********d
发帖数: 315 | 2 My point exactly, 支持aila.
which
new
in
of
compromised
【在 F********r 的大作中提到】
: Furthermore, we are concerned with proposed 8 CFR §245.25(b)(2)(ii), which
: requires “[a]n explanation from the new employer establishing that the new
: employment offer and the employment offer under the approved petition are in
: the same or similar occupational classification….” This requirement
: imposes on employers an untenable duty to know and understand the details of
: the previous employer’s position. Successor employers will likely not be
: willing to attest to information that is not their own, and should not be
: forced to do so. Again, the goal of achieving job flexibility is compromised
: by imposing such a requirement on successor employers. Only the employee
: should be involved in filing this form.
| F********r
发帖数: 1748 | 3 别这么快支持。。。
烙印的消息是移民局新出的这个玩意AILA是始作用者。现在又跑出来惺惺作态。
：My point exactly, 支持aila.
： | l*********d
发帖数: 315 | 4 移民局就是做个姿态而已，谁也不想在这个J表上吃官司。
这种依法无据的行政表格要法院推翻也太容易啦。AILA 也就是友情演出配合一下而已。
【在 F********r 的大作中提到】
: 别这么快支持。。。
: 烙印的消息是移民局新出的这个玩意AILA是始作用者。现在又跑出来惺惺作态。
:
: ：My point exactly, 支持aila.
: ：
|
|
