b*b 发帖数: 422 | 1 China opens up
NO NATION was ever ruined by trade, wrote Benjamin
Franklin. But what about an entire system of government?
That is the big question raised by the trade deal signed
by China and the United States this week, paving the way
for China抯 entry into the World Trade Organisation.
The deal raises plenty of other questions, too. Can Bill
Clinton get the deal through Congress? If so, can China be
made to play by the WTO抯 rules, or will its
obstructionism pull the whole organisation apart? D | b*b 发帖数: 422 | 2
一般来讲,《经济学人》上关于中国问题的报道都不是很客观很有
见地的。这篇也不例外。《经济学人》善于把中国问题用冷战思维
来表达,什么改革派的胜利,好象现在还有人在顽固坚持保守似的;
还有社会主义的丧钟,如果说有丧钟的话,丧钟早在二十多年前,
从毛进了水晶倌之时,就敲响过了。中国政府化大代价也要加入关贸,
这根本不令人惊讶,如果我们不加入了,象朱容基说,“不加入我们
过得也不错嘛。”如果他的确从内心认为不加入我们可以继续过得不
错,那倒是很令人惊讶的。
农民失业问题,中国的农民有很强的生存能力,很灵活的经济头脑,
这可能是《经济学人》的专栏作者们想不到的。中国农村如果能够进
入城市化,可以把农民大量转化成城镇居民。在开放的初期,并没有
经济学家指导农民去做低成本的鞋帽服装,但是今天全世界的手袋旅
游鞋有1/3是中国制造。他们是较早从农村走向城市的“城镇新居民”。
当然,这还得归功于外贸的持续发展。
金融问题,中国的金融一直很令人恐惧,不知道哪一天一家广东信用社
的破产是否就会导致连锁反应,让政府宣布破产。但是那主要是因为国
有金融企业一直没有按照市场规律,把坏帐压到中央不得不发新国债来
【在 b*b 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : China opens up : NO NATION was ever ruined by trade, wrote Benjamin : Franklin. But what about an entire system of government? : That is the big question raised by the trade deal signed : by China and the United States this week, paving the way : for China抯 entry into the World Trade Organisation. : The deal raises plenty of other questions, too. Can Bill : Clinton get the deal through Congress? If so, can China be : made to play by the WTO抯 rules, or will its : obstructionism pull the whole organisation apart? D
|
|