z****e
发帖数: 438 | 1 链接：http://zuyeyeblog.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!41919DE4E9624322!477.entry
今天有点儿时间，和大家分享一下关于写referee report的经验。
收到邀请写referee report？恭喜，证明你有了一定的知名度。referee的邀请往往从
自己的导师和周围认识的人开始。这也从一定程度上反映了networking的重要性。作为
一个jounior，作referee一定要认真，及时。收到邀请后，赶快答应。作为junior，当
然是饥不择食，有求必应。特别是如果自己以前从来没有给这个杂志当过referee，一
定要答应。这样自己简历上又多了一个杂志。重要的不仅仅是当referee的次数，给多
少个杂志当过referee更能反映一个人的知名度。如果一个人给某个杂志当了10次
referee，但没有收到其他杂志的邀请，很可能他的导师是这个杂志的editor，而他的
研究根本没有引起其他editor的注意。和另一个给10个杂志当了refereee，一个杂志一
次的相比，虽然当referee的总次数一样，第二个人的知名度显 |
U*****e
发帖数: 2882 | |
s***e
发帖数: 830 | 3 ding！
【在 z****e 的大作中提到】
: 链接：http://zuyeyeblog.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!41919DE4E9624322!477.entry
: 今天有点儿时间，和大家分享一下关于写referee report的经验。
: 收到邀请写referee report？恭喜，证明你有了一定的知名度。referee的邀请往往从
: 自己的导师和周围认识的人开始。这也从一定程度上反映了networking的重要性。作为
: 一个jounior，作referee一定要认真，及时。收到邀请后，赶快答应。作为junior，当
: 然是饥不择食，有求必应。特别是如果自己以前从来没有给这个杂志当过referee，一
: 定要答应。这样自己简历上又多了一个杂志。重要的不仅仅是当referee的次数，给多
: 少个杂志当过referee更能反映一个人的知名度。如果一个人给某个杂志当了10次
: referee，但没有收到其他杂志的邀请，很可能他的导师是这个杂志的editor，而他的
: 研究根本没有引起其他editor的注意。和另一个给10个杂志当了refereee，一个杂志一
|
f***5
发帖数: 1569 | 4 zai lai ding, duoxie ni . |
F****r
发帖数: 345 | 5 好文！
【在 z****e 的大作中提到】
: 链接：http://zuyeyeblog.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!41919DE4E9624322!477.entry
: 今天有点儿时间，和大家分享一下关于写referee report的经验。
: 收到邀请写referee report？恭喜，证明你有了一定的知名度。referee的邀请往往从
: 自己的导师和周围认识的人开始。这也从一定程度上反映了networking的重要性。作为
: 一个jounior，作referee一定要认真，及时。收到邀请后，赶快答应。作为junior，当
: 然是饥不择食，有求必应。特别是如果自己以前从来没有给这个杂志当过referee，一
: 定要答应。这样自己简历上又多了一个杂志。重要的不仅仅是当referee的次数，给多
: 少个杂志当过referee更能反映一个人的知名度。如果一个人给某个杂志当了10次
: referee，但没有收到其他杂志的邀请，很可能他的导师是这个杂志的editor，而他的
: 研究根本没有引起其他editor的注意。和另一个给10个杂志当了refereee，一个杂志一
|
s****0
发帖数: 42 | 6 regret not to read this in time
just refereed 2 papers |
d*******n
发帖数: 216 | 7 zuyeye 老大，多谢好文分享！
我现在正在写一个Referee Report on a revised manuscript. Should my
recommendation for acceptance/revision/rejection be completely based on how
the authors have responded to MY comments on the initial submission? I ask
this question because the authors have done a good job in dealing with my
concerns (so if this is the only thing I should care, I would recommend
acceptance) but their handling of the editor's and the other referee's
questions do not sound good to me (so I think more revision is needed). In
this case, should I recommend acceptance or revision? Should I talk about
how well I think the authors have dealt with the other comments?
Also if I don't agree with some of comments by the referee and the Editor, i
.e., I side with the authors, should I mention this to the Editor as well?
Many thanks. |
z****e
发帖数: 438 | 8 If I were u, I would suggest acceptance. But you can still provide your
suggestions in the letter to the editor to help the authors address the
editor and/or the other referee's questions. I would be very careful in
disputing the other referee's questions. Be nice and be clear about your
points. It is the editor's call if he/she wants to take your arguments and
if he/she wants to forward your suggestions to the authors. In my opion, you
have done your duty in improving the paper. It is the author's job to
address questions from the other referee and the editor. Hope it helps. |
d*******n
发帖数: 216 | 9 Thanks for the suggestions. They make sense to me and I will do accordingly
.
Thanks again for the helpful posts on this board.
you
【在 z****e 的大作中提到】
: If I were u, I would suggest acceptance. But you can still provide your
: suggestions in the letter to the editor to help the authors address the
: editor and/or the other referee's questions. I would be very careful in
: disputing the other referee's questions. Be nice and be clear about your
: points. It is the editor's call if he/she wants to take your arguments and
: if he/she wants to forward your suggestions to the authors. In my opion, you
: have done your duty in improving the paper. It is the author's job to
: address questions from the other referee and the editor. Hope it helps.
|
