s*****g
发帖数: 1055 | 1 Networking is going to change fundamentally in the next 5 to 10 years, and we are discussing what happens when you type http://www.google.com in your browser? come on ... this is not a networking 101 board, right?
Anyhow, here are my thoughts:
1)Flat L2 network. With server virutalization gaining popularity etc, we are likely going back to flat L2 network again, i.e. completely eliminate aggregation layer which people are following in their network design during last 10-15 years.
2)Data and sto | z**r
发帖数: 17771 | 2 I used that question in recent interviews, and the results were not bad,
hehe
All you mentioned is only for data centers? what do you think the service
provider network would be?
we are discussing what happens when you type http://www.google.com in your browser? come on ... this is not a networking 101 board, right?
are likely going back to flat L2 network again, i.e. completely eliminate
aggregation layer which people are following in their network design during
last 10-15 years.
are investing
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】
: Networking is going to change fundamentally in the next 5 to 10 years, and we are discussing what happens when you type http://www.google.com in your browser? come on ... this is not a networking 101 board, right?
: Anyhow, here are my thoughts:
: 1)Flat L2 network. With server virutalization gaining popularity etc, we are likely going back to flat L2 network again, i.e. completely eliminate aggregation layer which people are following in their network design during last 10-15 years.
: 2)Data and sto
| s*****g
发帖数: 1055 | 3 I don't know, GMPLS?
As digital resources are moving to consolidated data centers, end users will
access those information through the cloud (private and public),the
Internet will be flatter -- like the world. Service providers will shift
from simply providing network connections to customers to building
infrastructures for customers and sell or rent them. With current virutalization technology, customers' digital properties AND their live data center are essentially a bunch of files, they can t | w***s
发帖数: 321 | 4 What's the typical model of Flat L2 Network?
we are discussing what happens when you type http://www.google.com in your browser? come on ... this is not a networking 101 board, right?
are likely going back to flat L2 network again, i.e. completely eliminate
aggregation layer which people are following in their network design during
last 10-15 years.
are investing heavily on FCoE, but I think FCoE will lose steam before it
is widely adopted, the reason is with DCB/TRILL/10G, iSCSI
a
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】
: Networking is going to change fundamentally in the next 5 to 10 years, and we are discussing what happens when you type http://www.google.com in your browser? come on ... this is not a networking 101 board, right?
: Anyhow, here are my thoughts:
: 1)Flat L2 network. With server virutalization gaining popularity etc, we are likely going back to flat L2 network again, i.e. completely eliminate aggregation layer which people are following in their network design during last 10-15 years.
: 2)Data and sto
| z**r
发帖数: 17771 | 5 I think one of the trends for SP is to provide as many managed services as
they can, and network virtualization is something interesting too. IPv6 for
SP in US is still a few years away, but some of the sp's started thinking
about it, say ATT.
what do you mean by "internet will be flatter"?
will
virutalization technology, customers' digital properties AND their live data
center are essentially a bunch of files, they can take those files and play
them anywhere else in the cloud
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】
: I don't know, GMPLS?
: As digital resources are moving to consolidated data centers, end users will
: access those information through the cloud (private and public),the
: Internet will be flatter -- like the world. Service providers will shift
: from simply providing network connections to customers to building
: infrastructures for customers and sell or rent them. With current virutalization technology, customers' digital properties AND their live data center are essentially a bunch of files, they can t
| s*****g
发帖数: 1055 | 6 Internet will be flatter in the sense that there will be fewer BGP peering,
because data will be consolidated to data centers.
for
data
play
【在 z**r 的大作中提到】
: I think one of the trends for SP is to provide as many managed services as
: they can, and network virtualization is something interesting too. IPv6 for
: SP in US is still a few years away, but some of the sp's started thinking
: about it, say ATT.
: what do you mean by "internet will be flatter"?
:
: will
: virutalization technology, customers' digital properties AND their live data
: center are essentially a bunch of files, they can take those files and play
: them anywhere else in the cloud
| c*****i
发帖数: 631 | 7 how about cloud networking? seems it's a trend in data center | d****i
发帖数: 1038 | 8 For more detailed technologies, for example, vpls/vpws, what will be their
roles in the future networks? What specific technical trend will be for vpls
/vpws?
will
virutalization technology, customers' digital properties AND their live data
center are essentially a bunch of files, they can take those files and play
them anywhere else in the cloud, you can have a live data center again in
no time without affecting business continuity.
【在 s*****g 的大作中提到】
: I don't know, GMPLS?
: As digital resources are moving to consolidated data centers, end users will
: access those information through the cloud (private and public),the
: Internet will be flatter -- like the world. Service providers will shift
: from simply providing network connections to customers to building
: infrastructures for customers and sell or rent them. With current virutalization technology, customers' digital properties AND their live data center are essentially a bunch of files, they can t
| t*******r
发帖数: 3271 | 9 不是不想讨论, 我说点儿观点吧, 楼主就老打击我. 还老整洋文~ | z**r
发帖数: 17771 | 10 哈哈，别这么脆弱嘛
【在 t*******r 的大作中提到】
: 不是不想讨论, 我说点儿观点吧, 楼主就老打击我. 还老整洋文~
| s*****g
发帖数: 1055 | 11 Hehehe, it is just a pain to input Chinese, besides it is hard to translate
some terminologies to Chinese. |
|
