L*******g
发帖数: 913 | 1 还没发生，只是假设一下
如果前老板的manuscript要我review，是不是应该回绝？ |
j******l
发帖数: 1068 | |
p*f
发帖数: 739 | 3 editor应该没有时间一个个核对。
【在 j******l 的大作中提到】
: 只要很烂的杂志才会有这种烂事发生。
|
c8
发帖数: 282 | 4 no.
【在 L*******g 的大作中提到】
: 还没发生，只是假设一下
: 如果前老板的manuscript要我review，是不是应该回绝？
|
K**4
发帖数: 1015 | 5 见过很多这样的
不过可能当事人不晓得吧
或者没有关系？
有几次那个editor（曾经的学生）直接接收了
【在 L*******g 的大作中提到】
: 还没发生，只是假设一下
: 如果前老板的manuscript要我review，是不是应该回绝？
|
t****t
发帖数: 224 | 6 advisor/advisee relationship is a lifetime COI in almost all fields
【在 L*******g 的大作中提到】
: 还没发生，只是假设一下
: 如果前老板的manuscript要我review，是不是应该回绝？
|
c******a
发帖数: 633 | |
w****g
发帖数: 1070 | |
G*****s
发帖数: 664 | 9 what's COI?
【在 t****t 的大作中提到】
: advisor/advisee relationship is a lifetime COI in almost all fields
|
a****o
发帖数: 1786 | |
b*****r
发帖数: 203 | 11 Many editors often published papers on their own journals. Who cares?
【在 a****o 的大作中提到】
: conflict of interest
|
t****t
发帖数: 224 | 12 a well-run journal should have an editor-in-chief (or a small group of
associate editors) who handles the task of assigning which editor to handle
a submission. even if the paper is submitted by one of the editors, he won'
t know who is reviewing the paper. if the chief editor submits a paper, one
of the associate editors will do his job, although many chief editors avoid
doing that as well
【在 b*****r 的大作中提到】
: Many editors often published papers on their own journals. Who cares?
|
