w****u
发帖数: 303 | 1 【1】有啥写review的模板不？新AP第一次review，完全没经验。
【2】一个中牛的proposal，前面光说自己的prelim results和current support。15页
里research plan只有1.5页，broader impact半页。完全颠覆了我对NSF proposal的概
念。
原来牛牛们都是这么玩的啊。。。 | f*******e
发帖数: 3433 | 2 我还碰过一个大牛的12页的NSF proposal被fund 800K, 因为PM挺.
【在 w****u 的大作中提到】
: 【1】有啥写review的模板不？新AP第一次review，完全没经验。
: 【2】一个中牛的proposal，前面光说自己的prelim results和current support。15页
: 里research plan只有1.5页，broader impact半页。完全颠覆了我对NSF proposal的概
: 念。
: 原来牛牛们都是这么玩的啊。。。
| f*******h
发帖数: 1269 | 3 OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL:
INTELLECTUAL MERIT:
+ Strengths
- Weaknesses
* Potentially transformative?
BROADER IMPACTS:
* Impacts on science and society:
* Integration of Research and Education and Broadening Participation:
* Postdoc Mentoring Plan (if applicable):
DATA MANAGEMENT PLAN, including dissemination of results:
COLLABORATION PLAN (required for 2 or more PIs):
RESULTS FROM PRIOR NSF SUPPORT (if applicable):
HUMAN SUBJECTS (if applicable):
BUDGET (if necessary):
ADDITIONAL SUGGESTIONS:
PANEL RECOMMENDATION:
* Justification, including key strengths and critical weaknesses:
__ Highly Competitive (HC)
__ Competitive (C)
__ Low Competitive (LC)
__ Not Recommended for Funding by Panel (NRFP)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
The summary was read by the panel, and the panel concurred that the Panel
Summary accurately reflects the panel discussion. | M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | |
|
