L***s
发帖数: 9258 | 1 是没收他的文章。有个reviewer的意见是这样的：
"The figure X has been published in XXXXX 2014 proceeding and it was not cit
ed in this paper. So this should be considered as double submission".
收到老印的回信：
The XXXXX'14 paper (attached) is written by our collaborators which are also
authors of this paper. The XXXXX paper is a fundamentally different paper w
hich uses AAA for BBB. Our submission to YYYYY proposes an CCC scheme to add
ress DDD. They only share the basic device measurements which is used toward
completely different goals in these two papers.
This is a strong accusation without evidence, which could unintentionally da
mage the reputation of our group and is not acceptable from a high-quality c
onference like YYYYY.
我操，老印太不要脸了。振振有词的说同样的测试数据因为不同的原因就可以在两篇（
实际上是多篇）文章里不加引用的出现。 |
a***9
发帖数: 1884 | 2 说我歧视也罢, 我遇到印度来的稿件, 不管是审还是edit的, 基本都拒. 他们做的东西
太糙了.... |
l*******s
发帖数: 3562 | 3 抱怨你收还是不收？
cit
also
w
add
toward
da
c
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】
: 是没收他的文章。有个reviewer的意见是这样的：
: "The figure X has been published in XXXXX 2014 proceeding and it was not cit
: ed in this paper. So this should be considered as double submission".
: 收到老印的回信：
: The XXXXX'14 paper (attached) is written by our collaborators which are also
: authors of this paper. The XXXXX paper is a fundamentally different paper w
: hich uses AAA for BBB. Our submission to YYYYY proposes an CCC scheme to add
: ress DDD. They only share the basic device measurements which is used toward
: completely different goals in these two papers.
: This is a strong accusation without evidence, which could unintentionally da
|
L***s
发帖数: 9258 | 4 我把他据了。他告到TPC chair那里去了。
【在 l*******s 的大作中提到】
: 抱怨你收还是不收？
:
: cit
: also
: w
: add
: toward
: da
: c
|
s*********x
发帖数: 1923 | 5 If I were you, I will reply and cc the reply to as many as people. |
A******y
发帖数: 2041 | 6 If it is the same figure, it is not double-submission. It is self-
plagiarism. |
f*******e
发帖数: 3433 | 7 I agree. The reviewer should check both papers more carefully when
concluding that the paper is double-submission. If both papers are
proposing the same thing, then it is double-submission; otherwise, it is
self-plagiarism.
【在 A******y 的大作中提到】
: If it is the same figure, it is not double-submission. It is self-
: plagiarism.
|
o**********e
发帖数: 18403 | 8 赞。 多旁敲侧击政治正确得
宣传烙印无耻。
不要涉及种族，但是烙印
经常旁敲侧击得诋毁老中，
老中以其道还治其身，理所当然 |
L***s
发帖数: 9258 | 9 他老板是一个老中，还挺有名的，平时关系还不错。说self-plagiarism是准确的，不过
我觉得更严重。我已经给其中一个中国教授老板打电话了。他说这个学生投的时候他根
本不知道。我估计他给我写email的时候肯定没跟他老板商量。
【在 s*********x 的大作中提到】
: If I were you, I will reply and cc the reply to as many as people.
|
f*******e
发帖数: 3433 | 10 如果是学生发的，估计老板不知道。而且这人complain的是reviewer, 不是你。如果
reviewer说是self-plagiarism, 估计他没话可说。我读phd时一篇paper，2个reviewer
推荐接受，一个reviewer反对，给的唯一理由是他觉得工作像course project. 我的co
-advisor看了大怒，写了封信给TPC chair说这个reviewer的评语insulting.
不过
【在 L***s 的大作中提到】
: 他老板是一个老中，还挺有名的，平时关系还不错。说self-plagiarism是准确的，不过
: 我觉得更严重。我已经给其中一个中国教授老板打电话了。他说这个学生投的时候他根
: 本不知道。我估计他给我写email的时候肯定没跟他老板商量。
|
L***s
发帖数: 9258 | 11 说他double submission的当然不是我。我只是chair领导大家讨论。
reviewer
co
【在 f*******e 的大作中提到】
: 如果是学生发的，估计老板不知道。而且这人complain的是reviewer, 不是你。如果
: reviewer说是self-plagiarism, 估计他没话可说。我读phd时一篇paper，2个reviewer
: 推荐接受，一个reviewer反对，给的唯一理由是他觉得工作像course project. 我的co
: -advisor看了大怒，写了封信给TPC chair说这个reviewer的评语insulting.
:
: 不过
|
