d****s
发帖数: 128 | 1 刚刚看了NSF的policy，原学校可以有权利找一个新的PI，或者把这个grant终止掉，原
学校有这么大的权利哦，PI很被动，Proposal不是PI负责写的吗？之前发生过吗？原学
校找一个新的PI，不让PI把钱带走？Thanks!
https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf08_1/aag_2.jsp：
Disposition of a Grant When a PI/PD or co-PI/co-PD Transfers from One
Organization to Another Organization
(i) Policy. When a PI/PD plans to leave an organization during the course
of a grant, the organization has the prerogative to nominate a substitute
PI/PD or request that the grant be terminated and closed out. In those cases
where the PI/PD’s original and new organizations agree, NSF will
facilitate a transfer of the grant and the assignment of remaining
unobligated funds to the PI/PD’s new organization. This should normally be
done with a tripartite agreement (involving NSF, the PI/PD’s original
organization and new organization), or by a subaward arrangement (in certain
circumstances) between the PI/PD’s original and new organizations, subject
to NSF’s consent. (See AAG Chapter II.B.3.) |
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 2 对，原学校权力很大。特别有co pi情况下，学校可以让co pi变pi.这种事情发生过。 |
d****s
发帖数: 128 | 3 This is unfair.
【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 对，原学校权力很大。特别有co pi情况下，学校可以让co pi变pi.这种事情发生过。
|
s******g
发帖数: 3841 | 4 没啥unfair的，这钱本来就是nsf给你学校的，不是给你的
【在 d****s 的大作中提到】
: This is unfair.
|
g******t
发帖数: 11249 | 5 见过原学校不让转，结果PM认为做不了，直接砍掉的
【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 对，原学校权力很大。特别有co pi情况下，学校可以让co pi变pi.这种事情发生过。
|
h*******o
发帖数: 89 | |
