b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 1 很多division都拿出了几个program,搞全年随时投的试点。也不知道他们这么做的目的
是啥？ |
b*********0
发帖数: 1441 | 2 没deadline投的反而少
【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 很多division都拿出了几个program,搞全年随时投的试点。也不知道他们这么做的目的
: 是啥？
|
c*********7
发帖数: 19373 | 3 关键是什么时候评？随到随评还是攒一段时间一起评
【在 b*********0 的大作中提到】
: 没deadline投的反而少
|
b*********0
发帖数: 1441 | 4 没听说panel有什么变化
【在 c*********7 的大作中提到】
: 关键是什么时候评？随到随评还是攒一段时间一起评
|
h*********t
发帖数: 132 | 5 肯定是固定时间评了
不然随到随评的话那还不把review panel给折腾死
【在 c*********7 的大作中提到】
: 关键是什么时候评？随到随评还是攒一段时间一起评
|
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 6 还真是。但不知道全面推广后，会发生什么事情。
This week, at an NSF geosciences advisory committee meeting, Assistant
Director for Geosciences Roger Wakimoto revealed the preliminary results
from a pilot program that got rid of grant proposal deadlines in favor of an
anytime submission. The numbers were staggering. Across four grant programs
, proposals dropped by 59% after deadlines were eliminated. “We’ve found
something that many programs around the foundation can use,” Wakimoto told
the advisory committee on 13 April.
The idea is one of several that NSF has tested for easing the strain on the
merit review system. The no deadline idea began several years ago with a
small grant program for instruments and facilities within the earth sciences
division of the geosciences directorate. After making the switch in 2011,
the program saw a more than 50% drop in proposals—and that number has
stayed down ever since.
【在 b*********0 的大作中提到】
: 没deadline投的反而少
|
b*********0
发帖数: 1441 | 7 掉这么多？这个就是地质类吧。拿去生物方向一试，会不会数量一年翻一倍，到时候他
们就傻了。
an
programs
told
the
【在 b*****d 的大作中提到】
: 还真是。但不知道全面推广后，会发生什么事情。
: This week, at an NSF geosciences advisory committee meeting, Assistant
: Director for Geosciences Roger Wakimoto revealed the preliminary results
: from a pilot program that got rid of grant proposal deadlines in favor of an
: anytime submission. The numbers were staggering. Across four grant programs
: , proposals dropped by 59% after deadlines were eliminated. “We’ve found
: something that many programs around the foundation can use,” Wakimoto told
: the advisory committee on 13 April.
: The idea is one of several that NSF has tested for easing the strain on the
: merit review system. The no deadline idea began several years ago with a
|
n**********o
发帖数: 1016 | |
b*****d
发帖数: 61690 | 9 这个试点好像效果不好。没继续。
nsf搞了很多试点。还搞过，双盲评审。PI交两个proposal,一个15页，一个短些的。短
些的，隐去名字，交一个panel审。15页的交给另一个panel审。后来发现，两个panel
结果没有显著相关性。
【在 n**********o 的大作中提到】
: 上次NSF不是还发神经让提件人互相评审嘛。
|
