m********n
发帖数: 4570 | 1 ☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
waiting140 (等待140) 于 (Mon Dec 28 16:56:15 2009, 美东) 提到:
夫妻双方都有工作，年龄奔三，男方收入略高于女方，结婚时间3年多，没有小孩。都
是刚从学校毕业不久，男方工作了大半年，女方几个月，家里没有多少积蓄，更别提房
产了。这种情况在美国一般男方付给女方多少抚养费？
另外，假如要按收入的差额给抚养费，通常有无时间限制，比如要付若干年，还是终身，还是付到女方再婚？抚养费的数额是否随着将来双方收入的变化而变化？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
GoooG (pumpkin) 于 (Mon Dec 28 16:57:43 2009, 美东) 提到:
half to half,
or you can transfer the money to somewhere unknown before you divorce.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Fabozzi (没得发) 于 (Mon Dec 28 16:58:40 2009, 美东) 提到:
If the woman already got a job and the pay is not too much different from
the man's, then there really wouldn't be much 抚养费 if any.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
GoooG (pumpkin) 于 (Mon Dec 28 16:59:45 2009, 美东) 提到:
no, you still need to pay because law protect divorced woman.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Fabozzi (没得发) 于 (Mon Dec 28 17:02:59 2009, 美东) 提到:
That's not true. I have seen cases of women paying men because the women
make more money
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
GoooG (pumpkin) 于 (Mon Dec 28 17:04:12 2009, 美东) 提到:
these women are stupid and have no brain.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
guy8619 (jiao sha dou xing) 于 (Mon Dec 28 17:04:46 2009, 美东) 提到:
男方收入略高于女方
what the hell do you need 抚养费?
to protect layoff?
even if there is some, probably half the difference and you lose your
dignity
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
waiting140 (等待140) 于 (Mon Dec 28 17:05:23 2009, 美东) 提到:
half to half是什么意思？
是指离婚后，双方收入相加后对半分，也就是男方付给女方收入差额的一半？
如果是现有家庭财产的分割对半分，本来就没多少可分的。
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Fabozzi (没得发) 于 (Mon Dec 28 17:06:52 2009, 美东) 提到:
One example: Anne Heche, the TV/Movie star, has to pay her photographer ex-
husband every month
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
Fabozzi (没得发) 于 (Mon Dec 28 17:10:26 2009, 美东) 提到:
The law only protects the financially weaker ones, doesnt matter if it is
the man or woman
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
catsister (googoo) 于 (Mon Dec 28 17:49:45 2009, 美东) 提到:
yes, I also think that it would be a plain divorce without the alimony if
you two are making similar salaries and there is no kid involved. The law
protects children and consider the well-being of children to be with their
biological mother. It would be rediclous to think that the husband should be
paying the wife money when she is financially stable herself.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
catsister (googoo) 于 (Mon Dec 28 18:07:48 2009, 美东) 提到:
however, I do think that she would get half the money made by both in the
term of marriage, if they did not have a pre-nup. According to TV soaps, the
alimony will stop until the girl remarries. I like the system in US and
think that china would enforce the same to dig out the secret accounts and
grey income and protect children.
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
realnewbie (newbie) 于 (Mon Dec 28 18:19:11 2009, 美东) 提到:
一般不用给抚养费。
身，还是付到女方再婚？抚养费的数额是否随着将来双方收入的变化而变化？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
LQLeng (冷血) 于 (Mon Dec 28 18:51:04 2009, 美东) 提到:
See my criterion!
身，还是付到女方再婚？抚养费的数额是否随着将来双方收入的变化而变化？
☆─────────────────────────────────────☆
catsister (googoo) 于 (Tue Dec 29 17:40:16 2009, 美东) 提到:
I told my husband this post. He laughed..... |
|
