U***5
发帖数: 2796 | 1 前牛仔Nose Tackle, 四次Probowler.
连着两个赛季基本没怎么打球，敢跟JJ在更衣室里吵架。
赛季初没有draft DL很大程度上是期望他能回来打，这个赛季一直因为治伤的问题跟牛
仔闹。但是牛仔最后不得不cut之，现在占7-8个million的cap space.
结果人家立刻跟狗熊谈妥了。 | l*x
发帖数: 14021 | 2 琼斯不是说要告他欺骗来着？他说伤的很厉害，不能再打了，所以琼斯才把他cut掉，
结果一转身又原地满血，跟狗熊签了。 | U***5
发帖数: 2796 | 3 一直说他自己伤没好，牛仔把他放在Physically Unable to Perform list上。
结果过俩星期就没事了。
【在 l*x 的大作中提到】
: 琼斯不是说要告他欺骗来着？他说伤的很厉害，不能再打了，所以琼斯才把他cut掉，
: 结果一转身又原地满血，跟狗熊签了。
| d*****e
发帖数: 16730 | | U***5
发帖数: 2796 | 5 狗熊有收牛仔问题球员的历史，就这几年：
Roy Williams,
MB3
Sam Hurd (著名的好好先生 + 毒贩子）
Martellus Bennet(先去的巨人）
现在是Ratliff. | U***5
发帖数: 2796 | 6 http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/10/31/cowboys-make-it
Cowboys owner Jerry Jones isn’t saying anything about Jay Ratliff. A
magazine Jones owns is saying plenty.
At a time when Jones has uncharacteristically zipped it regarding Ratliff by
calling it a “legal matter,” the latest issue of Dallas Cowboys Star
Magazine jumps cannonball-style into the situation.
“This absolutely should be a legal matter,” Jeff Sullivan of Dallas
Cowboys Star Magazine writes in an article posted on the team’s official
website. “There is no way Ratliff should be paid for what has taken place
in 2013, which was slated to be the first season under his five-year, $40
million extension signed back in 2011. Of course, Ratliff was given the
signing bonus two years ago, so he was paid approximately $18 million
without having played a single snap under the new deal.”
Given the sensitivity of the issue, it’s hard to imagine that Sullivan
wrote those words (and the rest of a column that tees off on Ratliff)
without someone higher in the pecking order providing at least a nod of
approval. Regardless of whether the issue landed on the desk of anyone
named “Jones,” the simple reality is that the attack on Ratliff is coming
not from some independent publication, but from a media outlet owned and
operated ultimately by Jerry.
“Jay Ratliff, at some point and time, decided he was no longer playing for
the Dallas Cowboys,” Sullivan writes. “This could’ve been last December,
following a heated exchange with owner/GM Jerry Jones in the locker room
after a game, although there have been rumors that wasn’t the last verbal
sparring session the two had, with the most recent coming just weeks before
the Cowboys released Ratliff on Oct. 16.”
To clarify, a magazine owned by Jones now reports that there are rumors
Jones and Ratliff had another verbal altercation “just weeks before”
Ratliff was cut.
Sullivan also calls the situation a “soap opera,” and he writes that it is
“likely far from concluded.” He also reviews some of the basic facts of
the case, pointing out that Ratliff was arrested for DUI in January (a month
after Cowboys defensive lineman Josh Brent allegedly crashed a car while
driving drunk, claiming the life of Cowboys linebacker Jerry Brown), that
Ratliff supposedly pulled a hamstring in his 2013 training-camp conditioning
test, that Ratliff was seen “running on the field” the next day, that
Ratliff was considered to be day-to-day with the hamstring injury, that
Ratliff when he was released still wasn’t healthy, and that a week later
Ratliff was medically cleared to play for someone else.
“[H]e shouldn’t be paid a nickel, never mind millions of dollars for not
wanting to play for the team with which he was under contract and then
constructing a path out of town amidst a bunch of lies,” Sullivan writes.
“That is unacceptable. Ratliff is gone and the Cowboys are better off. As
for the money and the cap space in 2014, we just have to allow the legal
process to play out.”
Again, these words appeared not in a Dallas newspaper or on a football-
related website. They were published by a magazine owned and operated by
the Dallas Cowboys, who are owned and operated by Jerry Jones. Right, wrong
, or otherwise, the article leads to the inescapable conclusion that the
Cowboys will eventually be suing Ratliff, presumably through the NFL-NFLPA
grievance process.
【在 d*****e 的大作中提到】
: 恩 这个可以告？
: 算合同欺诈么？
| H**********i
发帖数: 1261 | 7 复活可以说说 可未必是满血 看上一场的表现。。。
不过这次我熊gm出手真是快 比以前的猪头angelo强百倍啊 |
|
