x******i
发帖数: 14369 | 1 【 以下文字转载自 LosAngeles 讨论区 】
发信人: splitmind (狗爹猫爸), 信区: LosAngeles
标 题: 关键时候还是学理工科有用啊
发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Apr 14 03:57:34 2012, 美东)
UCSD的一个物理学家用一篇论文在法庭上证明自己无罪，牛人啊！！
我估计法官看晕了，哈哈
A physicist at the University of California San Diego used his knowledge of
measuring bodies in motion to show in court why he couldn't be guilty of a
ticket for failing to halt at a stop sign. The argument, now a four-page
paper delving into the differences between angular and linear motion,
supposedly got the physicist out of a $400 ticket.
他写的原文在这里可以下载
http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.0162 | r****n
发帖数: 7223 | 2 忽悠啊
忽悠
of
【在 x******i 的大作中提到】
: 【 以下文字转载自 LosAngeles 讨论区 】
: 发信人: splitmind (狗爹猫爸), 信区: LosAngeles
: 标 题: 关键时候还是学理工科有用啊
: 发信站: BBS 未名空间站 (Sat Apr 14 03:57:34 2012, 美东)
: UCSD的一个物理学家用一篇论文在法庭上证明自己无罪，牛人啊！！
: 我估计法官看晕了，哈哈
: A physicist at the University of California San Diego used his knowledge of
: measuring bodies in motion to show in court why he couldn't be guilty of a
: ticket for failing to halt at a stop sign. The argument, now a four-page
: paper delving into the differences between angular and linear motion,
| s********a
发帖数: 2081 | 3 有p用, the judge is not 理工科. | l*****e
发帖数: 4600 | 4 可以出名
【在 s********a 的大作中提到】
: 有p用, the judge is not 理工科.
|
|
