t*********d
发帖数: 3398 | 1 讨论一下。
人家打的好， 为什么要让杆？这个和拳击啊举重什么的又不一样， 不是说体重大的有
优势， 打的好的人要么苦练出来， 要么天赋好，有什么错么？打个比方， 100米短跑
， 要不要也分个级， 然后跑得快的人必须加5秒什么的？ | v****e
发帖数: 19471 | 2 为了赌钱方便呗.
【在 t*********d 的大作中提到】
: 讨论一下。
: 人家打的好， 为什么要让杆？这个和拳击啊举重什么的又不一样， 不是说体重大的有
: 优势， 打的好的人要么苦练出来， 要么天赋好，有什么错么？打个比方， 100米短跑
: ， 要不要也分个级， 然后跑得快的人必须加5秒什么的？
| r*****a
发帖数: 421 | 3 With handcap, you can play with the guy better than you.
And you don't have to beat him to win. You win when you performed better
than you used to be but your opponent not.
So golf becomes a game in which you always want to be better than yourself.
If not, even when you are really good, you can still lose to someone worse
than you.
That's my understanding of the merit of this game.
【在 t*********d 的大作中提到】
: 讨论一下。
: 人家打的好， 为什么要让杆？这个和拳击啊举重什么的又不一样， 不是说体重大的有
: 优势， 打的好的人要么苦练出来， 要么天赋好，有什么错么？打个比方， 100米短跑
: ， 要不要也分个级， 然后跑得快的人必须加5秒什么的？
| w*******d
发帖数: 3714 | 4 是给业余选手一起玩准备的，而且你并不一定要用它，只不过说你想用的话，可以用。
就好象围棋里面的让子，高手让若干子，这样水平差很多的人下起来不至于太无趣。高
尔夫就是把让子给规范化了，也挺好的。
【在 t*********d 的大作中提到】
: 讨论一下。
: 人家打的好， 为什么要让杆？这个和拳击啊举重什么的又不一样， 不是说体重大的有
: 优势， 打的好的人要么苦练出来， 要么天赋好，有什么错么？打个比方， 100米短跑
: ， 要不要也分个级， 然后跑得快的人必须加5秒什么的？
| k******n
发帖数: 1265 | 5 为了增加乐趣，对高手来说让杆也属于挑战。
像楼上说的下棋还让车马炮了。 | e****e
发帖数: 884 | 6 体育运动还真少有让的。难道中国队输巴西4个球算打平？
只是golf这种君子运动有让球，君子嘛也不嫌丢人。
你打篮球让老黑让球试试？绝对嘲笑东亚病夫。 | t*********d
发帖数: 3398 | | t***w
发帖数: 165 | 8 The hdcp does not truely even the playing field, the low hdcp has a slight
advantage.
If you look-up the formula for how handicap is calculated you will realize
your handicap is a measure of your current "potential" not the simple
average of the difference of your score vs. par. If your average score is
92, your hdcp should be lower than 20. (Unless you play at a really easy
course most of the time.)
Therefore, a high hdcp (20+) has little chance of beating a low hdcp (8 or
less) if both keeps | s*****c
发帖数: 753 | 9 I fail to see the point in your argument.
The low hdcp also adopt the same formula. So his handicap is not the simple
average of the difference of his score vs par either.
The formula is, if you play 20 round, choose 10 best round and average.
Assuming both people have the same scoring distribution, I don't see why it
favors one over the other.
In fact, the scoring distribution, (which may due to your playing style, or
mentality) matters. For example, A have a handicap of 9 and B have
handica
【在 t***w 的大作中提到】
: The hdcp does not truely even the playing field, the low hdcp has a slight
: advantage.
: If you look-up the formula for how handicap is calculated you will realize
: your handicap is a measure of your current "potential" not the simple
: average of the difference of your score vs. par. If your average score is
: 92, your hdcp should be lower than 20. (Unless you play at a really easy
: course most of the time.)
: Therefore, a high hdcp (20+) has little chance of beating a low hdcp (8 or
: less) if both keeps
| t***w
发帖数: 165 | 10 Springc阿泉, you accurately pointed out that low handicapper are more
consistent therefore have a much better chance of matching their handicap.
Even more so is outlined below:
Your statement of "The formula is, if you play 20 round, choose 10 best
round and average. " is partially correct. Your handicap according to
USGA formula is lower than the simple average of the differential to par,(
adjusted for course slope rating) because of a reduction factor being
applied to the score differential.
【在 s*****c 的大作中提到】
: I fail to see the point in your argument.
: The low hdcp also adopt the same formula. So his handicap is not the simple
: average of the difference of his score vs par either.
: The formula is, if you play 20 round, choose 10 best round and average.
: Assuming both people have the same scoring distribution, I don't see why it
: favors one over the other.
: In fact, the scoring distribution, (which may due to your playing style, or
: mentality) matters. For example, A have a handicap of 9 and B have
: handica
| A*f
发帖数: 3067 | 11 hope you two keep the debate ongoing, since players are consistantly debatin
g about whether to "rang gan" or how to "rang gan" on the course.
【在 t***w 的大作中提到】
: Springc阿泉, you accurately pointed out that low handicapper are more
: consistent therefore have a much better chance of matching their handicap.
: Even more so is outlined below:
: Your statement of "The formula is, if you play 20 round, choose 10 best
: round and average. " is partially correct. Your handicap according to
: USGA formula is lower than the simple average of the differential to par,(
: adjusted for course slope rating) because of a reduction factor being
: applied to the score differential.
|
|
