z*****a 发帖数: 1214 | |
s**********e 发帖数: 454 | |
s******t 发帖数: 3572 | 3 why?
Even before this memo, I always remindered all petitioners the "small percen
tage", and "sustained national/international acclaim". They were, are, and w
ill be in the law. Nothing new in this memo.
【在 z*****a 的大作中提到】 : http://www.mitbbs.com/ym_article/SunLaw/30833405.html : 看完很depressed : 攒rp,PDF的link: : http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/Outreach/Interim%20Guidance%20for%20Comment/Kazarian%20Guidance%20AD10-41.pdf
|
z*****a 发帖数: 1214 | 4 这一强调,会不会收紧政策呀
percen
w
【在 s******t 的大作中提到】 : why? : Even before this memo, I always remindered all petitioners the "small percen : tage", and "sustained national/international acclaim". They were, are, and w : ill be in the law. Nothing new in this memo.
|
K**o 发帖数: 906 | 5 就是要更多的objective evidence;写pl时,可加上一条, summarzie证据证明part2
【在 z*****a 的大作中提到】 : 这一强调,会不会收紧政策呀 : : percen : w
|
z*****a 发帖数: 1214 | 6 只看3个基本点,还可以一个一个给objective evidence,强调这一个中心了,怕更是要看IO的心情了
如果只要objective evidence,就好了
part2
【在 K**o 的大作中提到】 : 就是要更多的objective evidence;写pl时,可加上一条, summarzie证据证明part2
|
F**p 发帖数: 1046 | |