h*********s
发帖数: 45 | 1 现在的EB1A的推荐信中是不是要直接写出：我是本领域里top1%？这个应该是很难量化
的吧？一般推荐
人会愿意这么些吗？
类似于下面这样的话是不够的吗？
I understand that only very top researchers within their fields are
qualified for EB1A and I sincerely believe Dr. XXXX is one of them.
His outstanding achievement is rare among his peers.
......innovation and accomplished far more than most of his peers in the
field of XXXX |
n***p
发帖数: 7668 | 2 This is more than strong enough.
【在 h*********s 的大作中提到】
: 现在的EB1A的推荐信中是不是要直接写出：我是本领域里top1%？这个应该是很难量化
: 的吧？一般推荐
: 人会愿意这么些吗？
: 类似于下面这样的话是不够的吗？
: I understand that only very top researchers within their fields are
: qualified for EB1A and I sincerely believe Dr. XXXX is one of them.
: His outstanding achievement is rare among his peers.
: ......innovation and accomplished far more than most of his peers in the
: field of XXXX
|
h*********s
发帖数: 45 | |
l*b
发帖数: 4369 | 4 我的都没写，过了。
【在 h*********s 的大作中提到】
: 现在的EB1A的推荐信中是不是要直接写出：我是本领域里top1%？这个应该是很难量化
: 的吧？一般推荐
: 人会愿意这么些吗？
: 类似于下面这样的话是不够的吗？
: I understand that only very top researchers within their fields are
: qualified for EB1A and I sincerely believe Dr. XXXX is one of them.
: His outstanding achievement is rare among his peers.
: ......innovation and accomplished far more than most of his peers in the
: field of XXXX
|
x*******0
发帖数: 2439 | 5 不会有太大帮助.
1% 必须用事实说话.所谓的solid evidence. |
h*********s
发帖数: 45 | 6 那推荐信的主要作用是什么？
【在 x*******0 的大作中提到】
: 不会有太大帮助.
: 1% 必须用事实说话.所谓的solid evidence.
|
