g*****6
发帖数: 583 | 1 第一次review通过，contribution被否，
递交RFE回复的时候，大家还递交了新的review证据吗？
这个不算数，递交上去了有害处没有啊？ |
H*7
发帖数: 4894 | |
e*****r
发帖数: 379 | 3 what's "contribution被否"??
can you share yours? |
M***m
发帖数: 762 | 4 bless..
【在 g*****6 的大作中提到】
: 第一次review通过，contribution被否，
: 递交RFE回复的时候，大家还递交了新的review证据吗？
: 这个不算数，递交上去了有害处没有啊？
|
a***n
发帖数: 3951 | 5 review应该也可部分算作contribution吧？ |
g*****6
发帖数: 583 | 6 就是IO说我没有contribution，这条没过。说publication啊，review啊，专利啊，
conference abstract都不能说明我的contribution是original 和significant，然后
就RFE了。这不，正在准备着呢。。。
【在 e*****r 的大作中提到】
: what's "contribution被否"??
: can you share yours?
|
m****w
发帖数: 1304 | 7 It depends. If the IO said "This criteria has been met", you are not
required to do anything. But sometime for the review part the IO may say "(
the evidence) has met the plain language of the regulation".In this case it
actually means that you didn't pass. You have to submit further evidence to
claim that you not only have judged others' work but also are within the top
small percentage of all reviewers.
Either way, to submit more material on journal/conference reviewing would be
a smart choice, as it will definitely strengthen your totality. |
R*******d
发帖数: 13640 | 8 Bless. 没有害处.
【在 g*****6 的大作中提到】
: 第一次review通过，contribution被否，
: 递交RFE回复的时候，大家还递交了新的review证据吗？
: 这个不算数，递交上去了有害处没有啊？
|
g*****6
发帖数: 583 | 9 Many Thanks for detailed information.Very helpful!
it
to
top
be
【在 m****w 的大作中提到】
: It depends. If the IO said "This criteria has been met", you are not
: required to do anything. But sometime for the review part the IO may say "(
: the evidence) has met the plain language of the regulation".In this case it
: actually means that you didn't pass. You have to submit further evidence to
: claim that you not only have judged others' work but also are within the top
: small percentage of all reviewers.
: Either way, to submit more material on journal/conference reviewing would be
: a smart choice, as it will definitely strengthen your totality.
|
