k****h
发帖数: 944 | 1 考了一下古，发现我的IO很变态，曾剧过条件很强的申请。
EB1B第七天收到RFE，IO很显然没怎么看，律师claim的四条全说not met,没claim的三
条也说我claim了但没met. 全篇九页，大部分是模版。
三年的experience也deied了 ，我有两年tenured-track experience, phd 期间有发表
文章, 导师有写experience的证明信。连我的employer，州里最大的大学的“ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
require (大学应该不适用的吧？）
最雷的是，质疑我所有的信件 （推荐信，审稿 信）只用我last name, "only the
letter from Dr. XXX referred to the beneficiary by his complete name. The
other letters only referred Dr. LXX, so it is not apparent that they are
referring to the beneficiary."
我递交的所有证据都熟识无堵。比如，media report 我附加了business week, Bloomberg news,
Euromoney, 及 NAB 的报道，他却说“ however, no documentary evidence was
submitted to support these claims"
看来，凶多吉少了。大家给点建议吧。 |
H*7
发帖数: 4894 | 2 patpat and bless!
靠，这是新找的 IO 吧。
我觉得你把材料重新组织一遍，按照rfe 的格式。估计他们也在走过程。 |
g*****6
发帖数: 583 | 3 bless~~
先平静一下心情，好好准备，没问题的 |
H*7
发帖数: 4894 | 4 近期怎么样，一切都好么？
【在 g*****6 的大作中提到】
: bless~~
: 先平静一下心情，好好准备，没问题的
|
k****h
发帖数: 944 | 5 推荐信不能光用 last name，要用全名这条是不是他原创的？
【在 g*****6 的大作中提到】
: bless~~
: 先平静一下心情，好好准备，没问题的
|
c**********n
发帖数: 13712 | 6 bless
ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
Bloomberg news,
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 推荐信不能光用 last name，要用全名这条是不是他原创的？
|
a***n
发帖数: 3951 | 7 bless!
一条一条的回答RFE，应该会过的！ |
k****h
发帖数: 944 | 8 RFE 统计里没出现过的IO.
【在 H*7 的大作中提到】
: patpat and bless!
: 靠，这是新找的 IO 吧。
: 我觉得你把材料重新组织一遍，按照rfe 的格式。估计他们也在走过程。
|
k****h
发帖数: 944 | 9 回头看了一下，显然我的推荐信，除了两封没全名外，其他都提到我的全名啊。
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 推荐信不能光用 last name，要用全名这条是不是他原创的？
|
l*******h
发帖数: 455 | 10 这个 IO 跟你们学校有仇吧，对二年级的 tenure-track 也动手
ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
Bloomberg news,
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 回头看了一下，显然我的推荐信，除了两封没全名外，其他都提到我的全名啊。
|
|
|
l*******h
发帖数: 455 | 11 Eb1a + pp 吧， 跟学校脱离关系
ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
Bloomberg news,
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 回头看了一下，显然我的推荐信，除了两封没全名外，其他都提到我的全名啊。
|
k****h
发帖数: 944 | 12 痛哭。。
【在 l*******h 的大作中提到】
: Eb1a + pp 吧， 跟学校脱离关系
:
: ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
: Bloomberg news,
|
v*********b
发帖数: 785 | |
k****h
发帖数: 944 | 14 大家bless 一下我吧。还有，有办法转IO的吗？ |
f******s
发帖数: 983 | |
E***r
发帖数: 401 | 16 这个IO有点变态 bless!
BTW,when is your RD?
ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 考了一下古，发现我的IO很变态，曾剧过条件很强的申请。
: EB1B第七天收到RFE，IO很显然没怎么看，律师claim的四条全说not met,没claim的三
: 条也说我claim了但没met. 全篇九页，大部分是模版。
: 三年的experience也deied了 ，我有两年tenured-track experience, phd 期间有发表
: 文章, 导师有写experience的证明信。连我的employer，州里最大的大学的“ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
: require (大学应该不适用的吧？）
: 最雷的是，质疑我所有的信件 （推荐信，审稿 信）只用我last name, "only the
: letter from Dr. XXX referred to the beneficiary by his complete name. The
: other letters only referred Dr. LXX, so it is not apparent that they are
: referring to the beneficiary."
|
R********s
发帖数: 3420 | |
p*******l
发帖数: 158 | |
l******e
发帖数: 534 | |
l******1
发帖数: 409 | 20 bless
ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 考了一下古，发现我的IO很变态，曾剧过条件很强的申请。
: EB1B第七天收到RFE，IO很显然没怎么看，律师claim的四条全说not met,没claim的三
: 条也说我claim了但没met. 全篇九页，大部分是模版。
: 三年的experience也deied了 ，我有两年tenured-track experience, phd 期间有发表
: 文章, 导师有写experience的证明信。连我的employer，州里最大的大学的“ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
: require (大学应该不适用的吧？）
: 最雷的是，质疑我所有的信件 （推荐信，审稿 信）只用我last name, "only the
: letter from Dr. XXX referred to the beneficiary by his complete name. The
: other letters only referred Dr. LXX, so it is not apparent that they are
: referring to the beneficiary."
|
|
|
t********o
发帖数: 369 | |
M***m
发帖数: 762 | 22 big bless.
ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 考了一下古，发现我的IO很变态，曾剧过条件很强的申请。
: EB1B第七天收到RFE，IO很显然没怎么看，律师claim的四条全说not met,没claim的三
: 条也说我claim了但没met. 全篇九页，大部分是模版。
: 三年的experience也deied了 ，我有两年tenured-track experience, phd 期间有发表
: 文章, 导师有写experience的证明信。连我的employer，州里最大的大学的“ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
: require (大学应该不适用的吧？）
: 最雷的是，质疑我所有的信件 （推荐信，审稿 信）只用我last name, "only the
: letter from Dr. XXX referred to the beneficiary by his complete name. The
: other letters only referred Dr. LXX, so it is not apparent that they are
: referring to the beneficiary."
|
f*****e
发帖数: 384 | 23 BLESS!
ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 考了一下古，发现我的IO很变态，曾剧过条件很强的申请。
: EB1B第七天收到RFE，IO很显然没怎么看，律师claim的四条全说not met,没claim的三
: 条也说我claim了但没met. 全篇九页，大部分是模版。
: 三年的experience也deied了 ，我有两年tenured-track experience, phd 期间有发表
: 文章, 导师有写experience的证明信。连我的employer，州里最大的大学的“ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
: require (大学应该不适用的吧？）
: 最雷的是，质疑我所有的信件 （推荐信，审稿 信）只用我last name, "only the
: letter from Dr. XXX referred to the beneficiary by his complete name. The
: other letters only referred Dr. LXX, so it is not apparent that they are
: referring to the beneficiary."
|
H****e
发帖数: 2050 | |
M***m
发帖数: 762 | 25 big bless.
ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 考了一下古，发现我的IO很变态，曾剧过条件很强的申请。
: EB1B第七天收到RFE，IO很显然没怎么看，律师claim的四条全说not met,没claim的三
: 条也说我claim了但没met. 全篇九页，大部分是模版。
: 三年的experience也deied了 ，我有两年tenured-track experience, phd 期间有发表
: 文章, 导师有写experience的证明信。连我的employer，州里最大的大学的“ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
: require (大学应该不适用的吧？）
: 最雷的是，质疑我所有的信件 （推荐信，审稿 信）只用我last name, "only the
: letter from Dr. XXX referred to the beneficiary by his complete name. The
: other letters only referred Dr. LXX, so it is not apparent that they are
: referring to the beneficiary."
|
T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 26 I think that for your case, it's easier to do RFE, because his claims are
not true, and it's easy to rebuke back one by one, of course in a nice tone.
It was just bad luck this time, or maybe he was too busy or careless that he
didn't read through your petition. Go ahead and file the RFE, he should
read it this time.
The harder RFE case is the one when IO said all the truth, and there's
nearly no way to rebuke.
Big Bless!
ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 考了一下古，发现我的IO很变态，曾剧过条件很强的申请。
: EB1B第七天收到RFE，IO很显然没怎么看，律师claim的四条全说not met,没claim的三
: 条也说我claim了但没met. 全篇九页，大部分是模版。
: 三年的experience也deied了 ，我有两年tenured-track experience, phd 期间有发表
: 文章, 导师有写experience的证明信。连我的employer，州里最大的大学的“ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
: require (大学应该不适用的吧？）
: 最雷的是，质疑我所有的信件 （推荐信，审稿 信）只用我last name, "only the
: letter from Dr. XXX referred to the beneficiary by his complete name. The
: other letters only referred Dr. LXX, so it is not apparent that they are
: referring to the beneficiary."
|
l*****g
发帖数: 1234 | |
k****h
发帖数: 944 | 28 Thanks for your comments.
Some parts of the RFE are easy to respond, but some generic parts, for
example, international recognized, can not easily be dismissed.
Basically, the whole case has to be re-done.
Thank you all for the blesses.
tone.
he
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: I think that for your case, it's easier to do RFE, because his claims are
: not true, and it's easy to rebuke back one by one, of course in a nice tone.
: It was just bad luck this time, or maybe he was too busy or careless that he
: didn't read through your petition. Go ahead and file the RFE, he should
: read it this time.
: The harder RFE case is the one when IO said all the truth, and there's
: nearly no way to rebuke.
: Big Bless!
:
: ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
|
l*****e
发帖数: 3522 | |
p*******h
发帖数: 1542 | |
|
|
m*****q
发帖数: 1930 | 31 bless
ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 考了一下古，发现我的IO很变态，曾剧过条件很强的申请。
: EB1B第七天收到RFE，IO很显然没怎么看，律师claim的四条全说not met,没claim的三
: 条也说我claim了但没met. 全篇九页，大部分是模版。
: 三年的experience也deied了 ，我有两年tenured-track experience, phd 期间有发表
: 文章, 导师有写experience的证明信。连我的employer，州里最大的大学的“ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
: require (大学应该不适用的吧？）
: 最雷的是，质疑我所有的信件 （推荐信，审稿 信）只用我last name, "only the
: letter from Dr. XXX referred to the beneficiary by his complete name. The
: other letters only referred Dr. LXX, so it is not apparent that they are
: referring to the beneficiary."
|
l*******s
发帖数: 26303 | |
s*******r
发帖数: 3429 | |
t********o
发帖数: 287 | 34 Bless.
To prove you're internationally recognized, my understanding is you will
have to show the officer:
(1)the countries your recommenders come from;
(2)the countries citing your papers;
(3)the countries the authors/journals are from when you serve as a reviewer.
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: Thanks for your comments.
: Some parts of the RFE are easy to respond, but some generic parts, for
: example, international recognized, can not easily be dismissed.
: Basically, the whole case has to be re-done.
: Thank you all for the blesses.
:
: tone.
: he
|
m*******1
发帖数: 344 | 35 Bless.
My case was denied after I replied RFE (TSC 1251, not sure whether you have
the same IO). One of my friend retrieved his original application after he
received a unreasonable RFE (suggested by his lawyer). In this way he didn'
t get a denial record. The next day they re-submitted the exact same
package. This time he's approved.
Just to share experience. |
T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 36 Sorry for mitbbsll1 that your case was denied after RFE. May you get it next
time.
What you said is very useful for keneth and new-comers. Thank you!
have
he
didn'
【在 m*******1 的大作中提到】
: Bless.
: My case was denied after I replied RFE (TSC 1251, not sure whether you have
: the same IO). One of my friend retrieved his original application after he
: received a unreasonable RFE (suggested by his lawyer). In this way he didn'
: t get a denial record. The next day they re-submitted the exact same
: package. This time he's approved.
: Just to share experience.
|
c******t
发帖数: 66 | 37 Bless. Worst case, just submit the same material again.
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
【在 k****h 的大作中提到】
: 考了一下古，发现我的IO很变态，曾剧过条件很强的申请。
: EB1B第七天收到RFE，IO很显然没怎么看，律师claim的四条全说not met,没claim的三
: 条也说我claim了但没met. 全篇九页，大部分是模版。
: 三年的experience也deied了 ，我有两年tenured-track experience, phd 期间有发表
: 文章, 导师有写experience的证明信。连我的employer，州里最大的大学的“ability to pay" 的evidence 也要
: require (大学应该不适用的吧？）
: 最雷的是，质疑我所有的信件 （推荐信，审稿 信）只用我last name, "only the
: letter from Dr. XXX referred to the beneficiary by his complete name. The
: other letters only referred Dr. LXX, so it is not apparent that they are
: referring to the beneficiary."
|
e****g
发帖数: 82 | |
k****h
发帖数: 944 | 39 We are on the same IO, and I was hard to believe that he denied your case,
given your strong background. Did you MTR or appeal?
Can you elaborate a little bit about your friend's strategy? You meant: He
withdrew the case? I have filed concurrent, so withdrawing the case seems a
little bit expensive to me. Was he reviewed by the same IO as ours?
have
he
didn'
【在 m*******1 的大作中提到】
: Bless.
: My case was denied after I replied RFE (TSC 1251, not sure whether you have
: the same IO). One of my friend retrieved his original application after he
: received a unreasonable RFE (suggested by his lawyer). In this way he didn'
: t get a denial record. The next day they re-submitted the exact same
: package. This time he's approved.
: Just to share experience.
|
k****h
发帖数: 944 | 40 Thanks. You meant, reapply or respond to RFE with the same material?
This IO is crazy, and I am sure that he will decline it if I submit the
same things.
【在 c******t 的大作中提到】
: Bless. Worst case, just submit the same material again.
:
: ★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb - 中文网站浏览器
|
|
|
n******w
发帖数: 170 | |
e*****r
发帖数: 379 | |
j********8
发帖数: 203 | |
k****n
发帖数: 938 | |
P*********y
发帖数: 986 | |
d*******o
发帖数: 193 | |
i*****a
发帖数: 291 | |
j**l
发帖数: 429 | |
r**m
发帖数: 2823 | |
h*****i
发帖数: 1017 | |
