q****m
发帖数: 153 | 1 发现收到有很多email，问我如何做simulation的，提到了我的方向，但是没有提到我
的论文相关的信息，我当年把我的email留在了一个google group里面，这些email都说是通过google group找到我的,请问这种email有用么？用了会不会有害？ | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 2 It can be used to strengthen contribution, as your work is useful and has
impact.
说是通过google group找到我的,请问这种email有用么？用了会不会有害？
【在 q****m 的大作中提到】
: 发现收到有很多email，问我如何做simulation的，提到了我的方向，但是没有提到我
: 的论文相关的信息，我当年把我的email留在了一个google group里面，这些email都说是通过google group找到我的,请问这种email有用么？用了会不会有害？
| T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 3 For the simulation they mentioned, which paper(s) of yours talked about it?
You could make the connections there. Of course, this evidence alone may not
be enough, which is used to support your work's usefulness. "Work" does not
necessarily mean "paper". For EB1B, Your work's impact is more important
than a mere paper publication or simple citations. For EB1A, "you" and your
reputation is more important than your work's impact.
I don't know whether "google group" will make any difference in this claim
though. | q****m
发帖数: 153 | 4 恩，说的挺对的，谢谢
?
not
not
your
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: For the simulation they mentioned, which paper(s) of yours talked about it?
: You could make the connections there. Of course, this evidence alone may not
: be enough, which is used to support your work's usefulness. "Work" does not
: necessarily mean "paper". For EB1B, Your work's impact is more important
: than a mere paper publication or simple citations. For EB1A, "you" and your
: reputation is more important than your work's impact.
: I don't know whether "google group" will make any difference in this claim
: though.
| c****w
发帖数: 565 | 5 I don't second this as any contribution if claimed. Fake emails can be
easily made. IO is not foolish, and I trust citation more.
?
not
not
your
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: For the simulation they mentioned, which paper(s) of yours talked about it?
: You could make the connections there. Of course, this evidence alone may not
: be enough, which is used to support your work's usefulness. "Work" does not
: necessarily mean "paper". For EB1B, Your work's impact is more important
: than a mere paper publication or simple citations. For EB1A, "you" and your
: reputation is more important than your work's impact.
: I don't know whether "google group" will make any difference in this claim
: though.
| T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 6 The emails are not fake, and they show that people are interested in the
work, and they want to learn about this work.
I didn't say that citation is not needed, but the email evidence is
supportive in claiming the contribution.
【在 c****w 的大作中提到】
: I don't second this as any contribution if claimed. Fake emails can be
: easily made. IO is not foolish, and I trust citation more.
:
: ?
: not
: not
: your
| c****w
发帖数: 565 | 7 OK, if you want more, give me your email and your paper. I will send any
number of emails of this kind to you.... | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 8 yes, and then if the IOs email you, you will say that it's fake.
That's how you make the fake emails, and that's you.
【在 c****w 的大作中提到】
: OK, if you want more, give me your email and your paper. I will send any
: number of emails of this kind to you....
| c****w
发帖数: 565 | 9 don't be angry..just want to point out, citation+email >citation. email
alone means nothing.
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: yes, and then if the IOs email you, you will say that it's fake.
: That's how you make the fake emails, and that's you.
| T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 10 We are saying the same thing, if you read what I said.
Okay, so that's clear now.
【在 c****w 的大作中提到】
: don't be angry..just want to point out, citation+email >citation. email
: alone means nothing.
|
|
