H*********3
发帖数: 84 | 1 Case算是较弱的，专业EE，国内土博，现top60大学博后，博后三年了。
Publication：21 English journal papers (15 as the first-author, and 6 as a
co-author)，8 English proceeding papers (3 as the first-author, and 4 as a
co-author), 3 English conference abstracts, 12 Chinese journal papers (3 as
first author), and 3 Chinese proceeding papers (2 as the first author, and 1
as a co-author) in nationally renowned conferences, a co-authored book
chapter, , 4 chinese patent applications.
Citation: 150+，All are independent from English papers, about 130+ from
first authored papers.
Review: 34 times for 18 journals; 1 time (about 20 abstracts) for a
conference. Citation 和Review 都分布在20多个国家。
Reference letters: 7 (one from present supervisor, one from previous
supervisor, 5 independent)
IO承认了authorship, review, 但是说没有足够的证据证明contribution of major
significance. 提供的材料中还有一个小奖，几个网站报道，以及证明自己对目前工作
的重要性的材料，本来这些都是用来加强contribution的，结果也让IO给揪出来分别以
“Award”“media report”和“leading role”给否了，加上“contribution”相当
于否了四项。
那三项不准备回复了，对于contribution，IO的理由是“This criterion has not
been met because the evidence submitted does not show that the beneficiary’
s contribution are considered to be of major significance in the field of
endeavor. All of the recommendation letters provide a statement about the
beneficiary’s talent and expertise in his field but fail to provide any
specific examples how this expertise has been an original contribution to
the field. In addition, the submitted evidence does not show that the
beneficiary’s contribution are considered to be of major significance to
the field of the endeavor. The submitted material does not discuss the
merits of the beneficiary’s work, his standing in the field, or any
significant impact that his work had on the field.”
Moreover, participation in scientific conferences and symposia is routine
and expected in the scientific community. The record has not established
that the beneficiary’s said new findings, models, methods, etc., that may
eventually have applications, have already impacted the field and elevate
him to be a level at or above almost all others in his field at the national
or international level. The fact that the beneficiary was among the first
to make a newdiscovery or develop a new model carries little weight. Of far
greater importance in his proceeding is the impact that beneficiary’s work
has already had on the overall field”
剩下的部分就都是模板了。说可以提供：
Objective documentary evidence of the significance of the beneficiary’s
contribution to the field.
Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently consider the
beneficiary’s work important.
Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss the beneficiary
’s contributions of major significance.
Evidence that the beneficiary’s major significant contribution(s) has
provoked widespread public commentary in the field or has been widely cited.
Evidence of the beneficiary’s work being implemented by others. Possible
evidence may include but is not limited to:
o Contracts with companies using the beneficiary’s products;
o Licensed technology being used by others;
o Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to the field.
看了以前否contribution的帖子，感觉IO的理由都大同小异。大家帮着给支支招吧。除
了常用的citation这些，还有什么能证明'major significance'呢？
然后是totality,感觉也和以前的帖子上说的基本一样。感觉IO没怎么仔细看材料，用
的是模板。
最后给了84天提供更detail的材料。大部分人是一个月，我这是接近三个月，基本上和
不少人不PP时间差不多，郁闷。
当时PP的时候，通过潜水观察很多人都是8，9个月，还有十个月多的。想想干脆pp算了
。干等下去急人不说，最终也有可能是RFE。PP之后，又看到有人说前阵子TSC抽调了人
去处理EB2的485，导致EB1的140拖到了十个月，现在他们努力再把时间缩短到四个月。
得，这个时间点应该不是PP的时候，果真拿到了RFE。但也有可能case还是不够强的缘
故，硬货少，没抓住IO的眼球。 | b*********r
发帖数: 7139 | 2 不支持PP的人，像我，会说这是PP惹的祸；支持PP的人会说，没关系了，补件后肯定会
过的，节省了时间。
背景很强了，BLESS LZ. | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 3 Your case looks very strong. Just prepare the RFE package to restate
everything.
Bless!
【在 H*********3 的大作中提到】
: Case算是较弱的，专业EE，国内土博，现top60大学博后，博后三年了。
: Publication：21 English journal papers (15 as the first-author, and 6 as a
: co-author)，8 English proceeding papers (3 as the first-author, and 4 as a
: co-author), 3 English conference abstracts, 12 Chinese journal papers (3 as
: first author), and 3 Chinese proceeding papers (2 as the first author, and 1
: as a co-author) in nationally renowned conferences, a co-authored book
: chapter, , 4 chinese patent applications.
: Citation: 150+，All are independent from English papers, about 130+ from
: first authored papers.
: Review: 34 times for 18 journals; 1 time (about 20 abstracts) for a
| s********n
发帖数: 2071 | | a***n
发帖数: 3951 | 5 Eb-1a or b? 重新组织一下contribution部分会过的 | l*****3
发帖数: 302 | | R*******d
发帖数: 13640 | | k******e
发帖数: 8870 | | H*********3
发帖数: 84 | 9 EB1A
【在 a***n 的大作中提到】
: Eb-1a or b? 重新组织一下contribution部分会过的
| v**p
发帖数: 61 | | | | v********a
发帖数: 155 | 11 觉得是应该满足了
建议lz把pl上传来大家看看，是不是组织的不是很合理导致io误认为5个claims呢
查的这么细按道理不应该是因为时间不够乱rfe吧 | n***p
发帖数: 7668 | 12 背景很强，估计是材料组织的问题。 是不是推荐信里没有仔细写别人如何应用了你的
成果？
as
1
的还不到4
【在 H*********3 的大作中提到】
: Case算是较弱的，专业EE，国内土博，现top60大学博后，博后三年了。
: Publication：21 English journal papers (15 as the first-author, and 6 as a
: co-author)，8 English proceeding papers (3 as the first-author, and 4 as a
: co-author), 3 English conference abstracts, 12 Chinese journal papers (3 as
: first author), and 3 Chinese proceeding papers (2 as the first author, and 1
: as a co-author) in nationally renowned conferences, a co-authored book
: chapter, , 4 chinese patent applications.
: Citation: 150+，All are independent from English papers, about 130+ from
: first authored papers.
: Review: 34 times for 18 journals; 1 time (about 20 abstracts) for a
| H*********3
发帖数: 84 | 13 IO 1153
【在 v**p 的大作中提到】
: 是哪个IO?
| p*******h
发帖数: 1542 | | y********u
发帖数: 963 | | C**********6
发帖数: 87 | 16 Strong background. Enough to pass the Eb1-a application. Find a lawyer if
you have trouble to organize your materials. | H*********3
发帖数: 84 | 17 是律师帮的忙，不方便传。但整个过程自己也花了大量的时间和精力准备材料。也可能
是提的太多了，误导了IO认为claim了多项了吧。
【在 v********a 的大作中提到】
: 觉得是应该满足了
: 建议lz把pl上传来大家看看，是不是组织的不是很合理导致io误认为5个claims呢
: 查的这么细按道理不应该是因为时间不够乱rfe吧
| c**********n
发帖数: 13712 | | c******g
发帖数: 9273 | | c*******7
发帖数: 525 | | h*******1
发帖数: 925 | 21 Strong case! 重新组织一下, 再要一些supportletters， 肯定能过！！Bless！ | s**m
发帖数: 4340 | 22 材料没有组织好？我们比你case弱多了，PP也过了。
bless！ |
|
