p*******c
发帖数: 224 | 1 在精华区里列有审稿证据包括以下几条：
Documents should include, but not limit to:
1. Correspondence from the journal that asked you to review papers
2. Letter from the journal to prove that you completed the review
3. Any documents to prove that you are a member of editorial board of
academic journals
4. Please also provide information of the criteria and requirements f being
invited to
be a reviewer or referee, if any
5. If your supervisor asked you to review an article on his behalf,please
ask him to
verify this in his recommendation letter
6. Testimonial letter from individuals, preferrably an editor, to prove you
have been
invited to be an expert reviewer as a result of your sustained national
or
international acclaims. The letter also needs to provide an background
intro of the
journals and verifies the criteria.
其中1，2是肯定都有email往来的记录应该没有问题。关于5，如果不是老板推荐的，应
该不是问题。
我的问题主要是关于以下3条：
关于3，作为reviewer并不一定是member of editorial board,那么这第三条是否是必
需的呢？
关于4，这条似乎不是一定要求的，是不是？如果需要的话，这个criteria and
requirements 是问编辑或者他们的网站来找吗？
关于6，我想1，2已经证明了自己被邀请审稿，这些邀请信一般都会说些基于你的专业
经验而邀请，那么再找编辑额外出具一份证明是否有必要呢？
多谢各位的解释和帮助！ | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 2 If you are not on the editorial board, then of course you don't need to (or
can) prove it.
Other criteria, verification, etc refer to the verification letters from the
editors. It looks good to have a couple of such letters. They are not the
full-blown reference letters. There are such templates out on the web as
well. |
|
