z**********8
发帖数: 766 | 1 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
Published material about work:
一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
"By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
authorship:
生物医学，13篇文章，5个一作，50多个独立引用，说数量都低于平均水平，不能说明international recognized以及stand apart from others
请教如何回答？
另外，初步想根据JCR，各篇文章IF都是4，5分，总排名（如120/8047）还行，但因为分类排名不高，能否只提总排名，不提分类排名？
"The publication record and number of citations generally appear to be slightly below average. You should submit evidence which documents xxx is inernationally recognized in his field of endeavor and stands apart from others in the academic community."
6封独立信，4封提到不认识我，说既然不认识，说明你不是international recognized，血的教训!!! 以后大家信里别提认识不认识你，我还是特意从版上看到的要提不认识，大错特错阿，又得找推荐信了，太郁闷了。。。
"one letter
--It appears Dr. XXX was unfamiliar with xx until he was asked to write the letter.
another letter...
--It appears Dr. xx was completely unknown to the author.
another letter...
--Dr. XXX was totally unfamiliar with xxx's work until his study in 2011." (PS. 这个最吐血，我的文章发在2006年, 被引用在2011年, 难道引用人得说我早就看过了文章，只是到了2011年才引用？实在不知如何回复了？)
虽然知道自己case确实很弱，但还是希望得到大家的帮助以更好地回复
另外，请问这个30天是指我们HR的人收到他们的fax开始算，还是从case被
处理的那天开始算？
真诚求帮助, 真诚求bless! 我会继续战斗, 谢谢！ | J****9
发帖数: 442 | 2 >如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
Ask a letter from the first author or the corresponding author to demonstrate that you made a leading contribution to the paper.
>另外，初步想根据JCR，各篇文章IF都是4，5分，总排名（如120/8047）还行，但因为
分类排名不高，能否只提总排名，不提分类排名？
Just to show that the journals in which your publications appear are the TOP of your field.
>说既然不认识，说明你不是international recognized?
Did you mentioned that they know you through reading your break-though making finding in the field?
I think this might be the same as the totality of your contribution.
The IO just grasped your weakness (citations) to ask for more supporting materials, do whatever you can to improve your case. Dig out your standouts!
Bless. | p********r
发帖数: 960 | 3 BIG BIG BLESS!!!
请问你的LUD有更新么？还是和状态一样，也没有更新？谢谢 | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 4 pat pat.
For this, though, "6封独立信，4封提到不认识我，说既然不认识，说明你不是
international recognized，血的教训!!! 以后大家信里别提认识不认识你，我还是特
意从版上看到的要提不认识，大错特错阿，又得找推荐信了，太郁闷了。。。"
You should write something like "I don't know this person personally, but I
know his work through his publications in xxx and yyy, and I have cited his
papers or invited him to be a reviewer for the journal I am an editor", etc. | a***n
发帖数: 3951 | | t****r
发帖数: 661 | 6 bless
虽然不是expert，但觉得你挺厉害的，1b应该够了，只是遇到变态的人
bless你能argue回来 | p*******l
发帖数: 2495 | 7 Bless.
Should ask the recommenders to say "never met you in person, nor worked with
you; however, know you because of your outstanding work."
Maybe you can ask your recommenders to write additional letters to clarfiy
this.
Good luck. | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 8 "共同第一作者还没有贡献？"
Perhaps you can find the other first author to say that your work is very
significant.
"生物医学，13篇文章，5个一作，50多个独立引用，说数量都低于平均水平"
Bio does seem to have more citations than other fields. You may try to
downplay your citation number.
"总排名（如120/8047）还行，但因为分类排名不高，能否只提总排名，不提分类排名
？"
Sure.
"30天是指我们HR的人收到他们的fax开始算，还是从case被处理的那天开始算？"
The RFE send-out date.
===================================================================
Principal: mention all the evidences that show your strength, but not to
mention anything that is not helpful. | z**********8
发帖数: 766 | 9 没有更新
【在 p********r 的大作中提到】
: BIG BIG BLESS!!!
: 请问你的LUD有更新么？还是和状态一样，也没有更新？谢谢
| h**********l
发帖数: 6342 | 10 你这个是媒体报导吧，相对来说是难点
而且信里面要说没有一起工作过， 不是说不认识。。。
时间从你的NOID上面有说应该。而且说的很明白
bless
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| | | z**********8
发帖数: 766 | 11 有一封信就是基本完全按照你说的写的，被批了，血的教训！
他的意思是既然你的工作很好，你也该被人认识，否则就不是international recognized, 所以我建议以后大家的信含糊一些
I
his
etc.
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: pat pat.
: For this, though, "6封独立信，4封提到不认识我，说既然不认识，说明你不是
: international recognized，血的教训!!! 以后大家信里别提认识不认识你，我还是特
: 意从版上看到的要提不认识，大错特错阿，又得找推荐信了，太郁闷了。。。"
: You should write something like "I don't know this person personally, but I
: know his work through his publications in xxx and yyy, and I have cited his
: papers or invited him to be a reviewer for the journal I am an editor", etc.
| o***i
发帖数: 124 | | T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 13 That's what I am trying to say here. You didn't learn the rules fully, and
then you are blaming me.
recognized, 所以我建议以后大家的信含糊一些
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 有一封信就是基本完全按照你说的写的，被批了，血的教训！
: 他的意思是既然你的工作很好，你也该被人认识，否则就不是international recognized, 所以我建议以后大家的信含糊一些
:
: I
: his
: etc.
| z**********8
发帖数: 766 | 14 是1b, 不是1a, 所以容易一些，
他承认了这条，只是觉得我在里面的贡献不够
【在 h**********l 的大作中提到】
: 你这个是媒体报导吧，相对来说是难点
: 而且信里面要说没有一起工作过， 不是说不认识。。。
: 时间从你的NOID上面有说应该。而且说的很明白
: bless
| k******e
发帖数: 8870 | | z**********8
发帖数: 766 | 16 sorry, I don't mean to blame you. I mean I was wrong.
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: That's what I am trying to say here. You didn't learn the rules fully, and
: then you are blaming me.
:
: recognized, 所以我建议以后大家的信含糊一些
| d********n
发帖数: 132 | 17 息怒 ~~~~~you are right
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: That's what I am trying to say here. You didn't learn the rules fully, and
: then you are blaming me.
:
: recognized, 所以我建议以后大家的信含糊一些
| d********n
发帖数: 132 | 18 bless
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| T*******y
发帖数: 6523 | 19 Sorry. I know that it's a hard time for you.
"你的工作很好，你也该被人认识"
This "认识" is such an ambiguous word here. The references don't know you
PERSONALLY, but they should say that they KNOW (are aware of, are following,
etc) your work, that's exactly a proof that you have international
reputation.
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: sorry, I don't mean to blame you. I mean I was wrong.
| h**********l
发帖数: 6342 | 20 你最好还是把原文贴出来，看看人家到底要求啥
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 是1b, 不是1a, 所以容易一些，
: 他承认了这条，只是觉得我在里面的贡献不够
| | | z**********8
发帖数: 766 | 21 多谢回复!
-Just to show that the journals in which your publications appear are the
TOP of your field.
就是因为在生物领域我的文章排名不行阿
-Did you mentioned that they know you through reading your break-though
making finding in the field?
I think this might be the same as the totality of your contribution.
我就是这样说的，说他们看到了我的paper大受启发啥的，还是悲剧了, 咋办阿？
demonstrate that you made a leading contribution to the paper.
【在 J****9 的大作中提到】
: >如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: Ask a letter from the first author or the corresponding author to demonstrate that you made a leading contribution to the paper.
: >另外，初步想根据JCR，各篇文章IF都是4，5分，总排名（如120/8047）还行，但因为
: 分类排名不高，能否只提总排名，不提分类排名？
: Just to show that the journals in which your publications appear are the TOP of your field.
: >说既然不认识，说明你不是international recognized?
: Did you mentioned that they know you through reading your break-though making finding in the field?
: I think this might be the same as the totality of your contribution.
: The IO just grasped your weakness (citations) to ask for more supporting materials, do whatever you can to improve your case. Dig out your standouts!
: Bless.
| h**********l
发帖数: 6342 | 22 生物医学， 你往engineering上面靠阿
你望生物上面靠，那引用都是大几百的，怎么比
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 多谢回复!
: -Just to show that the journals in which your publications appear are the
: TOP of your field.
: 就是因为在生物领域我的文章排名不行阿
: -Did you mentioned that they know you through reading your break-though
: making finding in the field?
: I think this might be the same as the totality of your contribution.
: 我就是这样说的，说他们看到了我的paper大受启发啥的，还是悲剧了, 咋办阿？
:
: demonstrate that you made a leading contribution to the paper.
| z**********8
发帖数: 766 | 23 JCR分类里，有一个可以靠，排在分类第一，但其他的都是在中间, 咋办?
【在 h**********l 的大作中提到】
: 生物医学， 你往engineering上面靠阿
: 你望生物上面靠，那引用都是大几百的，怎么比
| j******i
发帖数: 844 | | h**********l
发帖数: 6342 | 25 先把排第一的吹出来
其他不再第一的， 你按照小科目说
比如不再engineering大类的第一， 你说是在 小分类civil engineering里面第一
怎么能把你的往前放， 你怎么说就好了
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: JCR分类里，有一个可以靠，排在分类第一，但其他的都是在中间, 咋办?
| f*****s
发帖数: 633 | | m******s
发帖数: 1494 | 27 yes, exactly
I
his
etc.
【在 T*******y 的大作中提到】
: pat pat.
: For this, though, "6封独立信，4封提到不认识我，说既然不认识，说明你不是
: international recognized，血的教训!!! 以后大家信里别提认识不认识你，我还是特
: 意从版上看到的要提不认识，大错特错阿，又得找推荐信了，太郁闷了。。。"
: You should write something like "I don't know this person personally, but I
: know his work through his publications in xxx and yyy, and I have cited his
: papers or invited him to be a reviewer for the journal I am an editor", etc.
| s**m
发帖数: 4340 | | r*****q
发帖数: 1511 | | v******e
发帖数: 1715 | 30 bless
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| | | t****b
发帖数: 695 | | f*****e
发帖数: 1889 | | f******3
发帖数: 3139 | | f***m
发帖数: 611 | | f**********7
发帖数: 1139 | | b****e
发帖数: 26 | 36 ----
"By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
-----
Like many other have suggested, ask the other first author to state your
contribution is substantial.
-----
"The publication record and number of citations generally appear to be
slightly below average. You should submit evidence which documents xxx is
inernationally recognized in his field of endeavor and stands apart from
others in the academic community."
-----
Your citation number is a bit low if you want to compare to peers in the
field of Biology, rather you might want to go engineering...
-----
6封独立信，4封提到不认识我，说既然不认识，说明你不是international recognized
，血的教训!!! 以后大家信里别提认识不认识你，我还是特意从版上看到的要提不认识
，大错特错阿，又得找推荐信了，太郁闷了。。。
-----
It is very important to balance independent letters and letters from people
who know you very well. My approved Eb1b case had only 3 independent letters
, who claimed that they know me well through my work but have not met in
person. You need to modify your letters, i think this might be an oversight
from your lawyer. | w****g
发帖数: 486 | | e******r
发帖数: 9977 | 38 big bless，运气查了点啊，这case 1b足够了，好好准备回复吧。。。
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| u*******e
发帖数: 1186 | | a****s
发帖数: 4254 | | | | J********i
发帖数: 50662 | 41 bles
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| Z*****i
发帖数: 1888 | 42 bless!
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| d*******i
发帖数: 414 | 43 其实就是运气不好，遇到杀手了。关于认识不认识，我觉得不是直接写" I don't know
Dr.XXX",，应该说“I have never met Dr. XXX personally, but I know his work
through his publication on ......." 类似的,好好准备一下，应该能过。 | y****y
发帖数: 1153 | | i****n
发帖数: 13151 | | h***a
发帖数: 1775 | | H****e
发帖数: 2050 | | R********s
发帖数: 3420 | | l*9
发帖数: 574 | | c*********o
发帖数: 1734 | 50 Bless!
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| | | h********8
发帖数: 7355 | 51 bless
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| b*****n
发帖数: 854 | 52 这背景1A给个RFE可以理解，1B给NOID实在太变态了
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| I**1
发帖数: 2473 | 53 太可惜了，
你这个1b的律师应该发现这个问题啊。
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| h*****n
发帖数: 4747 | | c*********8
发帖数: 14 | 55 Big Bless.
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| c****d
发帖数: 3318 | | d********n
发帖数: 132 | 57 bless
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| s***a
发帖数: 7433 | 58 bless
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| w****9
发帖数: 6338 | | c*********n
发帖数: 2120 | 60 Bless! I think you will get it soon.
About: authorship:
生物医学，13篇文章，5个一作，50多个独立引用，说数量都低于平均水平，不能说明
international recognized以及stand apart from others
请教如何回答？
For all your publications, what is the average citation rate for their
journal? I think this is more straightforward to compare,and you can provide
the biggest numbers of your citations over the average.
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| | | y********o
发帖数: 9263 | | l**n
发帖数: 908 | 62 bless.
My background is similar and I am preparing EB1A. Hope to hear your good
news! | r******e
发帖数: 1872 | | h*****n
发帖数: 4747 | | c******g
发帖数: 9273 | 65 1b都这么麻烦了啊
bless
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| w*********m
发帖数: 4740 | 66 材料准备得不好
没有重点论述internationally recognized. 我拿了两页逐条论述和总结
internationally recognized
独立推荐信标准说法是没personally met 过，或者合作过， 但通过你得paper/
research早在200X年就了解了
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| f*********s
发帖数: 838 | | U****6
发帖数: 2175 | | x****w
发帖数: 881 | | g*******a
发帖数: 1160 | | | | n*2
发帖数: 19062 | | n*2
发帖数: 19062 | | d**k
发帖数: 1228 | | b*********r
发帖数: 7139 | 74 兄弟，你这个希望是PP IO拖延时间，1B足够了，IO这不是鸡蛋里挑骨头吗，尤其是独
立推荐人那段，我建议你除了找新推荐信，新引用证据什么的，再把重点的重新强调一
下，BLESS!!!【 在 zhangben8888 (zhangben) 的大作中提到: 】
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper | c***i
发帖数: 278 | | h***a
发帖数: 1775 | | z**********8
发帖数: 766 | | j****1
发帖数: 15497 | 78 Bless～
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| z**********8
发帖数: 766 | 79 谢谢版大回复！
就是不知如何证明research highlight就是主要评论我的文章？编辑现在还没有回复，
如果得不到编辑的证明，我实在不知道如何证明。google了一下，实在找不到这种证明
，看看有没有哪位朋友知道证明这个的网站或啥的。
总体而言，我也知道自己case太弱，引用太少，实力太差，所以不行也只能下次再试了。
谢谢！
【在 b*********r 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟，你这个希望是PP IO拖延时间，1B足够了，IO这不是鸡蛋里挑骨头吗，尤其是独
: 立推荐人那段，我建议你除了找新推荐信，新引用证据什么的，再把重点的重新强调一
: 下，BLESS!!!【 在 zhangben8888 (zhangben) 的大作中提到: 】
: article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
: reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
: and his contributions to the paper
| c*********n
发帖数: 2120 | 80 你的这个问题我不清楚，但是觉得你case不弱
这个引用也不用太纠结，我只有３０
好好整理材料要紧
了。
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 谢谢版大回复！
: 就是不知如何证明research highlight就是主要评论我的文章？编辑现在还没有回复，
: 如果得不到编辑的证明，我实在不知道如何证明。google了一下，实在找不到这种证明
: ，看看有没有哪位朋友知道证明这个的网站或啥的。
: 总体而言，我也知道自己case太弱，引用太少，实力太差，所以不行也只能下次再试了。
: 谢谢！
| | | l*b
发帖数: 4369 | 81 推荐信里不要说i do not know...
应该说i have never met or worked with XXX, but learned his extraordinary
contribution to XXX through his prestigious publications.
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| a******e
发帖数: 197 | 82 bless
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| b**********y
发帖数: 326 | 83 bless
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| h*****n
发帖数: 4747 | | M********4
发帖数: 1272 | | y******1
发帖数: 1167 | | c******r
发帖数: 130 | 87 Big bless！
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| a***e
发帖数: 644 | 88 bless!
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| a*********7
发帖数: 30080 | 89 祝福！
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| a**1
发帖数: 1645 | | | | z**m
发帖数: 83 | 91 Bless !
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| p****n
发帖数: 913 | | L******e
发帖数: 3260 | | h*****i
发帖数: 1017 | | G*******d
发帖数: 605 | 95 bless!
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| w****r
发帖数: 945 | | m*******u
发帖数: 679 | | l**n
发帖数: 908 | 98 bless
1b都这么过分。估计是这个IO太tough了吧 | h*******1
发帖数: 925 | 99 Bless!
article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other
reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author
and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
【在 z**********8 的大作中提到】
: 兄弟悲剧了，第14天NOID, 网上到现在也没有更新,
: 1b claim了Published material about work, authorship, contribution过了3条，
: totality没过，TSC Director XM1027, 绝对杀手
: Published material about work:
: 一篇共同第一作者文章被research highlight, 说这虽然是about work，但不是特别的
: 评论，因为还引用了其他文章，还说我贡献不够, 共同第一作者还没有贡献？悲催...
: 求帮助：如何说服research highlight就是单独评论特定文章，我已经写信给编辑了，
: 还没有收到回复，请问还有哪里或网站可以作证明research highlight就是评论文章。
: 如何回答/证明共同第一作者也是有贡献的？
: "By plain language, it appears you met this criterion. However, the one article cites xxx's paper, it also cites xxx articles from xxx other reserachers. In addition, it does not appear CCC was the principal author and his contributions to the paper were not articulated"
| i********y
发帖数: 760 | 100 Big Bless!
相信你肯定能通过的！
俺现在刚开始考古，要准备EB1A，吸取你的经验教训啊！
原来IO字字都挑！变态呀！ | | | b******i
发帖数: 4413 | | n*2
发帖数: 19062 | | n*2
发帖数: 19062 | | l****y
发帖数: 1461 | | q*p
发帖数: 667 | |
|
