K******g 发帖数: 1870 | 1 conference publication对EE/CS专业的人来说一般不亚于journal。每次发paper后就
要去会议上做presentation,我的律师把我先后8次做presentation的经历用了一段话
写在一份推荐信里,并且结尾说:
Dr. XXXX’s history of presentations at these prestigious conferences is
evidence of the outstanding nature of his research.
但是我觉得,每个phd只要发了paper就有机会present,这个是不是该吹捧的地方啊?
请有经验的人指教。 |
p*******l 发帖数: 2495 | 2 No problem with that sentence.
Attach some evidences to support "conference publication对EE/CS专业的人来说
一般不亚于journal。" such as low acceptance rate, etc. will help your case. |
s*****A 发帖数: 426 | 3 I think that statement is fine |
i*****t 发帖数: 24265 | |
K******g 发帖数: 1870 | 5 但是关键是律师用了两页推荐信里的一大段(1/3页)的长度列出我的presentation,
有这个必要吗?
【在 s*****A 的大作中提到】 : I think that statement is fine
|