D*******2
发帖数: 66 | 1 5／10， RD
6／6 ，PP
6／11, RFE received
OI：NSC0478
paper 26(中文16篇 英文10篇)
review 20（中文18 英文2）
citation 140
Claim authorship, review other’s work and contribution
No awards, No patents.
昨天收到RFE 材料，具体内容如下：
This criterion has not been met because the evidence submitted does not show
that your contributions are considered to be of major significance to the
field of endeavor. To assist in determining the whether your contributions
are original and of major significance, the petitioner may submit:
1. Objective documentary evidence of the significance of your
contribution to the field
2. Documentary evidence that people throughout the field currently
consider your work important
3. Testimony and/or support letters from experts which discuss your
contributions of major significance
4. Evidence that your major significant contribution(s) has provoked
widespread pubic commentary in the field or has been widely cited
5. Evidence of your work being implemented by others. Possible evidence
may include but is not limited to: a.Contracts with companies using your
products
b. Licensed technology being used by others
c. Patents currently being utilized and shown to be significant to
the field
d. Any other relevant evidence
请各位支招，怎么应对RFE。谢谢。 | K*N
发帖数: 7494 | | k*****o
发帖数: 983 | 3 我也收到一样的RFE了，bless，还在考虑该怎么办 | w****e
发帖数: 1322 | 4 You need more reviews bro. | j****t
发帖数: 1663 | 5 你在推荐信里是怎么吹你的contribution的。有说你的工作影响了别人的research吗？ | g****0
发帖数: 1681 | | f*********s
发帖数: 838 | | w*****n
发帖数: 111 | 8 这个很官方的模板rfe。和我的一摸一样.
你不要管他,直接在 RFE 信里 笼统回答. 每个贡献,后面列出发表的文章,同时说明发
文章的杂志很牛,有多大影响力等.同时列出相应的推荐信内容.
多找几个推荐信, 重新整理引用,发掘一些新的亮点,如果引用数目增加较多,可以特吹,
同时如果审稿增加了也可以吹.
【在 D*******2 的大作中提到】
: 5／10， RD
: 6／6 ，PP
: 6／11, RFE received
: OI：NSC0478
: paper 26(中文16篇 英文10篇)
: review 20（中文18 英文2）
: citation 140
: Claim authorship, review other’s work and contribution
: No awards, No patents.
: 昨天收到RFE 材料，具体内容如下：
| b****M
发帖数: 1390 | 9 马上找人要两份推荐信，至少一个是引用你文章的。熟人也行。
看来你的材料没有组织好，考古一下别人怎么处理的，特别是ladao5555有个长长的文
章。 |
|
