b******4 发帖数: 70 | 1 CS 总引用51次,但是一半是自引,我的问题是
1. 是否要去掉自引?文章基本都是09年和10年发的,是否可以解释自己文章太新所以
引用少,还是不提?
2. 另外考古板上提供的top 10 cs faculty们的引用数表,是否该用在首次提交的
petition letter里(怕专门提了,反被注意到这点),还是以后被RFE了再用?
3. 还有什么办法可以弥补citation的不足?
谢谢 |
K*N 发帖数: 7494 | 2 1B 很容易的。我见过10几个citation过了1B的。不要担心了。挖挖其他的亮点。bless |
c*********7 发帖数: 19373 | 3 1b强调的是international
【在 b******4 的大作中提到】 : CS 总引用51次,但是一半是自引,我的问题是 : 1. 是否要去掉自引?文章基本都是09年和10年发的,是否可以解释自己文章太新所以 : 引用少,还是不提? : 2. 另外考古板上提供的top 10 cs faculty们的引用数表,是否该用在首次提交的 : petition letter里(怕专门提了,反被注意到这点),还是以后被RFE了再用? : 3. 还有什么办法可以弥补citation的不足? : 谢谢
|
i******t 发帖数: 22541 | |
h****l 发帖数: 2993 | 5 不要提数量,重点放在citation来自世界各地,可行不? |
A******s 发帖数: 427 | 6 不用解释吧,我觉得引用不少了。我还没你一半多,也基本来自美国,推荐信更是全美
国,也过了呢。 |
x*****i 发帖数: 4035 | 7 should be OK for eb1-b. my LD is in engineering, only has 40+ indep
citations. his PL emphasized the ranking/impact factor of the journals where
his work were cited, and international impact (citation map).
we also included the table on citation rate per field in the exhibits,
lawyer didn't mention it in PL though. if your citation rate is better than
top CS faculty, why not use it to your advantage.
since the key is to prove your contribution and impact, your RLs can be the
ideal place to show these. if your RLs sound convincing, they should more
than make up for low citation rate. good luck!
【在 b******4 的大作中提到】 : CS 总引用51次,但是一半是自引,我的问题是 : 1. 是否要去掉自引?文章基本都是09年和10年发的,是否可以解释自己文章太新所以 : 引用少,还是不提? : 2. 另外考古板上提供的top 10 cs faculty们的引用数表,是否该用在首次提交的 : petition letter里(怕专门提了,反被注意到这点),还是以后被RFE了再用? : 3. 还有什么办法可以弥补citation的不足? : 谢谢
|
i******t 发帖数: 22541 | 8 nice!
where
than
the
【在 x*****i 的大作中提到】 : should be OK for eb1-b. my LD is in engineering, only has 40+ indep : citations. his PL emphasized the ranking/impact factor of the journals where : his work were cited, and international impact (citation map). : we also included the table on citation rate per field in the exhibits, : lawyer didn't mention it in PL though. if your citation rate is better than : top CS faculty, why not use it to your advantage. : since the key is to prove your contribution and impact, your RLs can be the : ideal place to show these. if your RLs sound convincing, they should more : than make up for low citation rate. good luck!
|
|