n****t 发帖数: 27 | 1 Denial notice on Sep. 13.
For your reference, review, authorship and contribution are all confirmed by
0002, but he claims that the small percentage was not met.
I have been working on this for almost 10 months wasting lots of money and
time. I will get away from it and not think about it for a while. There are
more important things in life.
背景如下:
Physics. Papers 25, review 20+, citation 140+ and increased to 160+ in the
RFE response.
These numbers make a normal case, I might get lucky if the IO was not 0002.
But the citation is obviously below 0002's threshold.
谢谢所有跟贴的,祝大家好运,避开0002 |
i******t 发帖数: 22541 | 2 能提供一下背景吗 楼主
谢谢
一起分析下 下次再战! |
w****u 发帖数: 1078 | 3 bless for your next time |
u*****l 发帖数: 512 | |
w****u 发帖数: 1078 | 5 觉得得要有人来整一下这个0002了。 LZ还是蛮强的case. |
i******t 发帖数: 22541 | 6 lz啥背景
【在 w****u 的大作中提到】 : 觉得得要有人来整一下这个0002了。 LZ还是蛮强的case.
|
L**S 发帖数: 7833 | 7 考古就发现了。
楼主140+的引用
20+的审稿,
的确很强呀,物理的
【在 i******t 的大作中提到】 : lz啥背景
|
i******t 发帖数: 22541 | 8 normal啊
没觉得强啊
【在 L**S 的大作中提到】 : 考古就发现了。 : 楼主140+的引用 : 20+的审稿, : 的确很强呀,物理的
|
b*********r 发帖数: 7139 | 9 这次只是运气不好,短暂休息调整再递交吧,祝福下次好运!
by
are
【在 n****t 的大作中提到】 : Denial notice on Sep. 13. : For your reference, review, authorship and contribution are all confirmed by : 0002, but he claims that the small percentage was not met. : I have been working on this for almost 10 months wasting lots of money and : time. I will get away from it and not think about it for a while. There are : more important things in life. : 背景如下: : Physics. Papers 25, review 20+, citation 140+ and increased to 160+ in the : RFE response. : These numbers make a normal case, I might get lucky if the IO was not 0002.
|
z****a 发帖数: 372 | 10 看得惊心动魄,我正在准备0002的RFE,没有信心了
楼主,你如果diy,再交一次 |
|
|
n******e 发帖数: 1248 | 11 楼主和我的background很像
这个背景在普通方向上的物理,很好了
看来top percentage很重要
楼主放宽心,调整好杀个回马枪 |
b********u 发帖数: 890 | 12 只是运气不好而已, 过一段再交一次吧, bless |
s9 发帖数: 1192 | 13 pat,等过段时间再递一次吧,下回就不会碰见这个officer了。
by
are
【在 n****t 的大作中提到】 : Denial notice on Sep. 13. : For your reference, review, authorship and contribution are all confirmed by : 0002, but he claims that the small percentage was not met. : I have been working on this for almost 10 months wasting lots of money and : time. I will get away from it and not think about it for a while. There are : more important things in life. : 背景如下: : Physics. Papers 25, review 20+, citation 140+ and increased to 160+ in the : RFE response. : These numbers make a normal case, I might get lucky if the IO was not 0002.
|
m******d 发帖数: 414 | 14 comfort
by
are
【在 n****t 的大作中提到】 : Denial notice on Sep. 13. : For your reference, review, authorship and contribution are all confirmed by : 0002, but he claims that the small percentage was not met. : I have been working on this for almost 10 months wasting lots of money and : time. I will get away from it and not think about it for a while. There are : more important things in life. : 背景如下: : Physics. Papers 25, review 20+, citation 140+ and increased to 160+ in the : RFE response. : These numbers make a normal case, I might get lucky if the IO was not 0002.
|
y****c 发帖数: 2260 | 15 看了下LZ的文章不少啊,有25
综合下来比我的背景强
搞得心里怕怕的 |
f********i 发帖数: 8412 | |
d****y 发帖数: 102 | 17 楼主, 就用同样的材料, DIY Refile。 很有机会的。不要灰心。这个纯粹是概率事
件。
我的条件比你差多了(实话,citation ~ 15)。第一次RFE + Denial。 重递PP通过。
从新挖掘一下自己的条件,把没有想到的再想想。 会有突破点的。
- 把citation的质量分析一下。。。多少牛人都折服于你的paper下。。。
- 把所有的成果总结一下,强调一下应用。。。多少大实验室都在延续你的工作。
- 我就是把老板所有的funding都归功到自己的研究,加起来一两百万funding震慑一
下IO。。。 |
c*******t 发帖数: 5182 | 18 bless
cheer up
by
are
.
【在 n****t 的大作中提到】 : Denial notice on Sep. 13. : For your reference, review, authorship and contribution are all confirmed by : 0002, but he claims that the small percentage was not met. : I have been working on this for almost 10 months wasting lots of money and : time. I will get away from it and not think about it for a while. There are : more important things in life. : 背景如下: : Physics. Papers 25, review 20+, citation 140+ and increased to 160+ in the : RFE response. : These numbers make a normal case, I might get lucky if the IO was not 0002.
|
t****a 发帖数: 439 | 19 Pat, pat
Take a break and try it again |
z****a 发帖数: 372 | 20 碰到0002没话说,patent 有应用都要RFE,证明contribution
judge 通过最后在totality里说review paper 不能说明outstanding...
0002到底啥逻辑,猜不透
。
【在 d****y 的大作中提到】 : 楼主, 就用同样的材料, DIY Refile。 很有机会的。不要灰心。这个纯粹是概率事 : 件。 : 我的条件比你差多了(实话,citation ~ 15)。第一次RFE + Denial。 重递PP通过。 : 从新挖掘一下自己的条件,把没有想到的再想想。 会有突破点的。 : - 把citation的质量分析一下。。。多少牛人都折服于你的paper下。。。 : - 把所有的成果总结一下,强调一下应用。。。多少大实验室都在延续你的工作。 : - 我就是把老板所有的funding都归功到自己的研究,加起来一两百万funding震慑一 : 下IO。。。
|
|
|
L**S 发帖数: 7833 | 21 你不能跟我等生物wsn比丫
【在 i******t 的大作中提到】 : normal啊 : 没觉得强啊
|
l***l 发帖数: 1138 | 22 pat楼主
运气不好而已,休息一个月重新递,下次一定过 |
m******2 发帖数: 1056 | 23 我觉得你下次small percentage得部分就好好强调一下。
比如你文章都发在什么样得杂志上啊,杂志都是领域内得排名多少啊,引用比平均高多
少倍啊,你跟faculty1000那个比较高多少多少倍啊什么得。
多强调一下。下个月再递一次,反正正好下个月新一年得名额下来了,不差这么一个月
两个月得。
而且再递就应该不会是0002了吧。
bless!!!!!! |
y****c 发帖数: 2260 | 24 话说F1000一直不知道怎么用,能教一下吗?
和top research universities faculty scholarly productivity index有差别吗?
我只会用这个
【在 m******2 的大作中提到】 : 我觉得你下次small percentage得部分就好好强调一下。 : 比如你文章都发在什么样得杂志上啊,杂志都是领域内得排名多少啊,引用比平均高多 : 少倍啊,你跟faculty1000那个比较高多少多少倍啊什么得。 : 多强调一下。下个月再递一次,反正正好下个月新一年得名额下来了,不差这么一个月 : 两个月得。 : 而且再递就应该不会是0002了吧。 : bless!!!!!!
|
m******2 发帖数: 1056 | 25 我说的就是这个。。。
名字记混了,我就记得是个什么faculty index的东西。。。原来是两个东西么。。。
你说的f1000我没用过。。。
【在 y****c 的大作中提到】 : 话说F1000一直不知道怎么用,能教一下吗? : 和top research universities faculty scholarly productivity index有差别吗? : 我只会用这个
|
b******s 发帖数: 695 | 26 F1000应该就是faculty1000吧
那个index感觉很低啊,能上及格线的都能beat他们
【在 m******2 的大作中提到】 : 我说的就是这个。。。 : 名字记混了,我就记得是个什么faculty index的东西。。。原来是两个东西么。。。 : 你说的f1000我没用过。。。
|
m******2 发帖数: 1056 | 27 败给你们了。我说错了好了吧,我名字记错了行么。不是f1000是这个
http://chronicle.com/stats/productivity/
你们不要老揪着我的错了行不行。正经出点主意帮楼主不比什么都好? |
y****c 发帖数: 2260 | 28 我觉得小杂志更加容易找top,轻松上到1%或者No.1,No.2
一些比较牛的杂志反而排名看起来没有小杂志那么性感
或许LZ应该多挖一下小杂志
【在 m******2 的大作中提到】 : 败给你们了。我说错了好了吧,我名字记错了行么。不是f1000是这个 : http://chronicle.com/stats/productivity/ : 你们不要老揪着我的错了行不行。正经出点主意帮楼主不比什么都好?
|
y****c 发帖数: 2260 | 29 如果在140提交和RFE之间又有新的证据,比如LZ的引用增加,是不是不能用?
by
are
★ 发自iPhone App: ChineseWeb 7.5
【在 n****t 的大作中提到】 : Denial notice on Sep. 13. : For your reference, review, authorship and contribution are all confirmed by : 0002, but he claims that the small percentage was not met. : I have been working on this for almost 10 months wasting lots of money and : time. I will get away from it and not think about it for a while. There are : more important things in life. : 背景如下: : Physics. Papers 25, review 20+, citation 140+ and increased to 160+ in the : RFE response. : These numbers make a normal case, I might get lucky if the IO was not 0002.
|
z****a 发帖数: 372 | 30 这个怎么比啊!!!话说你拜庙这么有用。。。
【在 m******2 的大作中提到】 : 我说的就是这个。。。 : 名字记混了,我就记得是个什么faculty index的东西。。。原来是两个东西么。。。 : 你说的f1000我没用过。。。
|
|
|
w****u 发帖数: 1078 | 31 About F1000, here is some information
http://f1000.com/about/whatis/faculty
"The Faculty currently recommends more than 1500 articles each month,
corresponding to approximately the top 2% of all published articles in the
biology and medical sciences"
http://f1000.com/about/faqs
"F1000 is a rapid online service that highlights and recommends the most
important articles across biology and medicine on the basis of the opinions
of over 10,000 of the world's top scientists and clinicians."
【在 y****c 的大作中提到】 : 话说F1000一直不知道怎么用,能教一下吗? : 和top research universities faculty scholarly productivity index有差别吗? : 我只会用这个
|
k*****o 发帖数: 983 | |
y****c 发帖数: 2260 | 33 多谢了
不是做生物这方面的
看来我不能用f1000
opinions
【在 w****u 的大作中提到】 : About F1000, here is some information : http://f1000.com/about/whatis/faculty : "The Faculty currently recommends more than 1500 articles each month, : corresponding to approximately the top 2% of all published articles in the : biology and medical sciences" : http://f1000.com/about/faqs : "F1000 is a rapid online service that highlights and recommends the most : important articles across biology and medicine on the basis of the opinions : of over 10,000 of the world's top scientists and clinicians."
|
g******2 发帖数: 1244 | 34 pat pat! There are more important things in life as you said. Apply some
time later, 0002 will be avoid by then.
by
are
.
【在 n****t 的大作中提到】 : Denial notice on Sep. 13. : For your reference, review, authorship and contribution are all confirmed by : 0002, but he claims that the small percentage was not met. : I have been working on this for almost 10 months wasting lots of money and : time. I will get away from it and not think about it for a while. There are : more important things in life. : 背景如下: : Physics. Papers 25, review 20+, citation 140+ and increased to 160+ in the : RFE response. : These numbers make a normal case, I might get lucky if the IO was not 0002.
|