O*****n
发帖数: 56 | 1 我审稿的经验比较有限，目前审过的都是original articles, 有实验的数据的那种。
最近接到一个审稿机会是要求审理一篇review文章。文章与我研究生领域相关，并不难
理解，但是不知道该如何审理review.好像没有办法向对article一样对其novelty,
significance, experimental design 和 statistics作评价。希望能得到有相关经验
的xdjm指教！谢谢！！ | s***n
发帖数: 678 | 2 For a review paper, the journal or the editor should also give you a
guideline. Generally, it emphasizes more on the readability side. You should
pay attentions to the things like: does it cover all the important results?
Is it fair in citing references? Is it biased? Is it correct in
interpreting the other people's results? Are the materials grouped in a
reasonable way? For some journals, the audience of a review paper is mostly
non-experts in this particular field. So the introduction and schematics
should be well written. |
|
