l*****1 发帖数: 91 | 1 It is amazing there are 10 independent recitations after her paper published
only one year, in the situation of the average recitation of the Journal is
less than 3 times per paper per year. |
l*****1 发帖数: 91 | |
o******t 发帖数: 161 | 3 应该是citations,不应该用recitations吧。 |
l*****1 发帖数: 91 | 4 太感谢了,我竟然什么都没看出来
你觉得这句话本身怎么样?
可以这么说吗?
引用这么少。。。
【在 o******t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 应该是citations,不应该用recitations吧。
|
h*****l 发帖数: 785 | 5 It is very strong recommendation. Recitation is different from citation,and
much stronger. You can highlight this sentence in PL. |
x****l 发帖数: 978 | 6 这么客观和strong的句子,为啥要删掉?你想要什么句子?假大空?
published
is
【在 l*****1 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : It is amazing there are 10 independent recitations after her paper published : only one year, in the situation of the average recitation of the Journal is : less than 3 times per paper per year.
|
l*****1 发帖数: 91 | 7 没有经验啊,
想这就这么几个引用,还这么吹,太过分了。
【在 x****l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这么客观和strong的句子,为啥要删掉?你想要什么句子?假大空? : : published : is
|
l*****1 发帖数: 91 | 8 没有经验啊,
想这就这么几个引用,还这么吹,太过分了。
【在 x****l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 这么客观和strong的句子,为啥要删掉?你想要什么句子?假大空? : : published : is
|
x**********6 发帖数: 16 | 9 Please tell me where you find the official "3 times per paper per year"? I'm
in the same situation. Thanks!
Bless |
c********g 发帖数: 2075 | |