f**********1
发帖数: 1419 | 1 上个星期收到RFE,说contribution这一项不能证明major significance. 列的论据里有
这么个问题,大家能不能帮我出出主意,不胜感激.
Also, the petitioner claims many research studies that she has worked on as
her own. However, the evidence would say other wise. As Dr. XXX states in
his letter, "(The petitioner) was a key member of my group..." This
statement is not disputed - with the numerous letters submitted, it appears
that the petitioner has played an important role in most every project that
she has been part of. However, as Dr.XXX points out with this example, the
research projects are not shown as being hers. No evidence suggests that the
other projects were her own."
这里的Dr.XXX是我的博士老板,我递I140的时候主要讲了我博士和博士后期间的
projects,我在博士后老板的推荐信和PL里用了"led"这样的字眼,但是没有明确说过这
些项目是我的啊,而且在这种阶段绝大部分的项目都是老板申下来的啊,我应该怎样回复
这一条呢? | z***b
发帖数: 4667 | 2 对这条你还是找当时的PI给你重新出推荐信吧
as
appears
that
the
【在 f**********1 的大作中提到】
: 上个星期收到RFE,说contribution这一项不能证明major significance. 列的论据里有
: 这么个问题,大家能不能帮我出出主意,不胜感激.
: Also, the petitioner claims many research studies that she has worked on as
: her own. However, the evidence would say other wise. As Dr. XXX states in
: his letter, "(The petitioner) was a key member of my group..." This
: statement is not disputed - with the numerous letters submitted, it appears
: that the petitioner has played an important role in most every project that
: she has been part of. However, as Dr.XXX points out with this example, the
: research projects are not shown as being hers. No evidence suggests that the
: other projects were her own."
| M*****k
发帖数: 1556 | 3 让你的老板再解释一下子，然后多上两封独立推荐信。 | y********g
发帖数: 782 | | d***y
发帖数: 8107 | | f**********1
发帖数: 1419 | 6 NSC 0444,光看这个号码就很不吉利,郁闷...
【在 y********g 的大作中提到】
: 哪个ＩＯ？
| f**********1
发帖数: 1419 | 7 谢谢大家的答复.我已经和老板要一封新的信了,具体写法上大家有没有什么建议? |
|
