l***c 发帖数: 199 | 1 朋友无影响因子的review 太多了,被NOID了。看来,无影响因子的review要慎重呀。
Review:
"The evidence does not show that the work the beneficiary judged is
recognized as distinguished within her field of endeavor. Evidence must in
addition to showing that the beneficiary has served as a reviewer, must show
that the reputation of the organizations that the beneficiary judged for
are recognized with a distinguished reputation within the filed of endeavor.
" |
a*****y 发帖数: 33185 | 2 sigh,那有些新的open access的杂志的review看来没用了
in
show
endeavor.
【在 l***c 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 朋友无影响因子的review 太多了,被NOID了。看来,无影响因子的review要慎重呀。 : Review: : "The evidence does not show that the work the beneficiary judged is : recognized as distinguished within her field of endeavor. Evidence must in : addition to showing that the beneficiary has served as a reviewer, must show : that the reputation of the organizations that the beneficiary judged for : are recognized with a distinguished reputation within the filed of endeavor. : "
|
c*****t 发帖数: 590 | 3 说不定国际会议review还更好些
in
show
endeavor.
【在 l***c 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 朋友无影响因子的review 太多了,被NOID了。看来,无影响因子的review要慎重呀。 : Review: : "The evidence does not show that the work the beneficiary judged is : recognized as distinguished within her field of endeavor. Evidence must in : addition to showing that the beneficiary has served as a reviewer, must show : that the reputation of the organizations that the beneficiary judged for : are recognized with a distinguished reputation within the filed of endeavor. : "
|
c********g 发帖数: 2075 | 4 我有一个同事一样的原因被NOID了,所以最好大部分是IF〉2的杂志比较保险。 |
a*****m 发帖数: 4745 | 5 1a 还是 1b 的情况阿?
in
show
endeavor.
【在 l***c 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 朋友无影响因子的review 太多了,被NOID了。看来,无影响因子的review要慎重呀。 : Review: : "The evidence does not show that the work the beneficiary judged is : recognized as distinguished within her field of endeavor. Evidence must in : addition to showing that the beneficiary has served as a reviewer, must show : that the reputation of the organizations that the beneficiary judged for : are recognized with a distinguished reputation within the filed of endeavor. : "
|
t********2 发帖数: 315 | 6 跟我一样呀,你的朋友打算怎么回复?
in
show
endeavor.
【在 l***c 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 朋友无影响因子的review 太多了,被NOID了。看来,无影响因子的review要慎重呀。 : Review: : "The evidence does not show that the work the beneficiary judged is : recognized as distinguished within her field of endeavor. Evidence must in : addition to showing that the beneficiary has served as a reviewer, must show : that the reputation of the organizations that the beneficiary judged for : are recognized with a distinguished reputation within the filed of endeavor. : "
|
h******l 发帖数: 373 | |
z********4 发帖数: 533 | |
o*********5 发帖数: 894 | 9 tw
【在 h******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 要求这么严, 请问是TSC还是NSC?
|
l***c 发帖数: 199 | 10 是的呀,国际会议还可以吹。无影响因子,open access杂志还真不知道怎么吹呀。
本来很多IO就觉得review是常规工作,不算judge了,如果还是无影响因子的,可能就
更难搞了。
【在 c*****t 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 说不定国际会议review还更好些 : : in : show : endeavor.
|
|
|
l***c 发帖数: 199 | 11 是的是的,这也是我的感觉。IF》2一般都可吹成top 20%的杂志。或top 10% 的领域杂
志。
【在 c********g 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 我有一个同事一样的原因被NOID了,所以最好大部分是IF〉2的杂志比较保险。
|
l***c 发帖数: 199 | 12 1A。
一般1B,就不用review好了。claim三点,还不如claim两点呢。claim三点,搞不好,
还被IO当成1A来审,就亏大了。
【在 a*****m 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 1a 还是 1b 的情况阿? : : in : show : endeavor.
|
l***c 发帖数: 199 | 13 叫老板,转审稿,IF》5的。还很容易,搞了两三篇了,就说最近一个月内就有3片 top
5%的杂志审稿呗。也不知道有没有用。
看RP了,只有。
【在 t********2 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 跟我一样呀,你的朋友打算怎么回复? : : in : show : endeavor.
|
l***c 发帖数: 199 | 14 我们这边是TSC的。
不过,NSC好多IO本来就认为review是常规工作,要是再审垃圾杂志,可能更麻烦。
【在 h******l 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 要求这么严, 请问是TSC还是NSC?
|
l*********1 发帖数: 1 | 15 你朋友怎么样了。怎么对付的呀。非常感谢!
我也同样的原因被NOID了。
看来不能要无影响因子的review了。
in
show
endeavor.
【在 l***c 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 朋友无影响因子的review 太多了,被NOID了。看来,无影响因子的review要慎重呀。 : Review: : "The evidence does not show that the work the beneficiary judged is : recognized as distinguished within her field of endeavor. Evidence must in : addition to showing that the beneficiary has served as a reviewer, must show : that the reputation of the organizations that the beneficiary judged for : are recognized with a distinguished reputation within the filed of endeavor. : "
|
s****x 发帖数: 4701 | 16 无影响因子的文章就3次,总共28次22篇,这无影响因子的review是放还是不放比较好
呢? |
w****0 发帖数: 803 | 17 你是哪个处理中心?
【在 l*********1 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 你朋友怎么样了。怎么对付的呀。非常感谢! : 我也同样的原因被NOID了。 : 看来不能要无影响因子的review了。 : : in : show : endeavor.
|
t********a 发帖数: 2 | 18 后来过了吗?
in
show
endeavor.
【在 l***c 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 朋友无影响因子的review 太多了,被NOID了。看来,无影响因子的review要慎重呀。 : Review: : "The evidence does not show that the work the beneficiary judged is : recognized as distinguished within her field of endeavor. Evidence must in : addition to showing that the beneficiary has served as a reviewer, must show : that the reputation of the organizations that the beneficiary judged for : are recognized with a distinguished reputation within the filed of endeavor. : "
|
H*******o 发帖数: 1637 | 19 我和你情况差不多,有领域最好的杂志的审稿,也有不少无影响因子的
我都放了,过了
我的感觉是,不能以无影响因子的为主,作为点缀增加数量是没有问题的
【在 s****x 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 无影响因子的文章就3次,总共28次22篇,这无影响因子的review是放还是不放比较好 : 呢?
|
l***c 发帖数: 199 | 20 别放无影响因子的了!最近好多这个RFE和NOID的。放了自找麻烦呀。
19 和 22 差不了多少。而且,在等一个月绝对可以涨到25.
【在 s****x 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 无影响因子的文章就3次,总共28次22篇,这无影响因子的review是放还是不放比较好 : 呢?
|
|
|
a*****m 发帖数: 4745 | 21 如果说大部分都是低分的呢情况呢? 比如说IF =1 的有20个, 剩下10个不到IF=3-5杂
志, 然后还有一个没IF的新杂志的editorial board
【在 l***c 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 别放无影响因子的了!最近好多这个RFE和NOID的。放了自找麻烦呀。 : 19 和 22 差不了多少。而且,在等一个月绝对可以涨到25.
|
l***c 发帖数: 199 | 22 同意你的观点。
但,问题是,需不需要点缀。好多review9次,10几次的,都无RFE过了。
主要是针对review 而RFE本来就不多。既然垃圾review会带来RFE,而从没听说review
次数少了几次而带来 RFE,为啥还要加垃圾杂志review呢?
【在 H*******o 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 我和你情况差不多,有领域最好的杂志的审稿,也有不少无影响因子的 : 我都放了,过了 : 我的感觉是,不能以无影响因子的为主,作为点缀增加数量是没有问题的
|
b**********0 发帖数: 2 | 23 那我一个月review了20几篇 editor说,所有的manuscript都提几点小意见就接收的
review,看来是不敢用了……
【在 l***c 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 别放无影响因子的了!最近好多这个RFE和NOID的。放了自找麻烦呀。 : 19 和 22 差不了多少。而且,在等一个月绝对可以涨到25.
|
l***c 发帖数: 199 | 24 我觉得有影响因子的,在申请绿卡的时候都不能叫垃圾杂志了:)
【在 a*****m 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 如果说大部分都是低分的呢情况呢? 比如说IF =1 的有20个, 剩下10个不到IF=3-5杂 : 志, 然后还有一个没IF的新杂志的editorial board
|
l***c 发帖数: 199 | 25 最好是不用了……
【在 b**********0 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 那我一个月review了20几篇 editor说,所有的manuscript都提几点小意见就接收的 : review,看来是不敢用了……
|
t********a 发帖数: 2 | 26 你朋友怎么应对的?后来过了吗?
in
show
endeavor.
【在 l***c 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 朋友无影响因子的review 太多了,被NOID了。看来,无影响因子的review要慎重呀。 : Review: : "The evidence does not show that the work the beneficiary judged is : recognized as distinguished within her field of endeavor. Evidence must in : addition to showing that the beneficiary has served as a reviewer, must show : that the reputation of the organizations that the beneficiary judged for : are recognized with a distinguished reputation within the filed of endeavor. : "
|
l***c 发帖数: 199 | 27 后来请了律师了。
M你了。
【在 t********a 的大作中提到】![](/moin_static193/solenoid/img/up.png) : 你朋友怎么应对的?后来过了吗? : : in : show : endeavor.
|